Hello folks,
This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’ ?
There seems to be plenty of room to put everything on a single line…?
Thanks for your help!
JM
%
\version "2.19"
P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative {
\compressMMRests
R1*2 |
Hi Shevek,
> I don't mind having to insert the occasional layout-related command —
> I actually prefer the ability to switch between clearly defined behaviors,
> rather than have Lilypond try to guess which to use.
I like having both options. =)
> The biggest problem caused by inserting command
Hi Shevek,
>> I don't mind having to insert the occasional layout-related command —
>> I actually prefer the ability to switch between clearly defined behaviors,
>> rather than have Lilypond try to guess which to use.
>
> I like having both options. =)
For example, just because we have the comm
Hi Shevek,
> Correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but it sounds like you're using the
> edition engraver to do various score layouts, but in each version the staff
> distribution will stay the same throughout the piece. My use case is a bit
> different, as within the course of a piece I need to be
On 15.06.2017 17:38, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
There are obviously improvements that could still be made, but this is
closer to what I want in my score than the "BEFORE" version.
Hi Kieren,
that’s quite nice and I definitely agree lyrics spacing should go in
that direction. I once imagined on
- Original Message -
From: "Menu Jacques"
To: "lilypond-user"
Cc: "Menu Jacques"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 11:39 AM
Subject: Multiple rest and system break
Hello folks,
This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’
? There seems to be plenty of room
Thanks Phil.
This seems to happen when there are R’s in sequence.
P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative {
\compressMMRests
R1 |
R1 |
r2 r4 r8 r16 r32 r64 r128 r128 |
\bar "|."
}
has the same problem, but:
P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative {
\compressMMRests
R1 |
r1 |
Hi Kieren,
I use some helper functions to enter edition-mods of the same kind.
Again this might not be self-explaining ... but perhaps you get the
idea. And of course: maybe it is more sufficient to use the
markup-hammer and separate the lyrics from the music with a mace!
Jan-Peter
Am 15.0
Hi, in a score I find a breack but I would like to have it in the next beat.
How can I tell it in Frescobaldi? Thanks and excuse me for the humble
question.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Humble-question-Forced-line-breack-tp203890.html
Sent from the User
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Son_V wrote:
> Hi, in a score I find a breack but I would like to have it in the next beat.
> How can I tell it in Frescobaldi? Thanks and excuse me for the humble
> question.
Greetings, Son_V -
It's difficult to tell from your description exactly what your probl
Il giorno ven 16 giu 2017 alle 15:51, Son_V
ha scritto:
Hi, in a score I find a breack but I would like to have it in the
next beat. How can I tell it in Frescobaldi? Thanks and excuse me for
the humble question.
Do you know \break and \noBreak commands? If not, search the LilyPond
documenta
Hi Ralph, thanks.
I will try: in a score I have something like
Gui-da gentil, m'ac-com-pa-gni nel-
la via del nos-tro cammin
I would like to instruct Frescobaldi to cut the score in a different way,
like
Gui-da gentil, m'ac-com-pa-gni nel-la
via del nos-tro cammin
How can I put it in English? i
Grazie Federico
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Humble-question-Forced-line-breack-tp203890p203894.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Frederico,
what you gave us is not a minimal working (compilable) example.
I suggest something like this
\version "2.19.52"
\language "deutsch"
RH= \relative c'' {
\time 4/4
\key c \major
\repeat unfold 20 c4
}
LH = \relative c {
\clef bass
\key c \major
\repeat unfold 20 c
}
St
Menu Jacques wrote Friday, June 16, 2017 11:39 AM
> This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’ ?
> There seems to be plenty of room to put everything on a single line…?
> %
> \version "2.19"
>
> P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative {
> \compr
Hello Trevor,
Thanks, I had never used \newSpacingSection.
JM
> Le 16 juin 2017 à 17:46, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
>
>
> Menu Jacques wrote Friday, June 16, 2017 11:39 AM
>
>> This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’
>> ? There seems to be plenty of room to
Okay, I see what you're doing. I can see how this would be helpful if you're
an engraver doing multiple editions of a piece. From my perspective, this
type of separation of concerns is actually counterproductive, because as I
compose I may add or subtract measures many times. Having to keep the
edi
> Being able to do score and parts from the same music is yet another reason
I always want to keep the music code clear of any presentation-layer
commands.
I just make sure to precede every partcombine instruction with a \tag for
the score it pertains to.
>> The biggest problem caused by inserti
Hi Shevek,
> as I compose I may add or subtract measures many times.
> Having to keep the editorial changes synced with the score
Currently that *is* an issue. (Note: I don't compose into Lilypond; I tried it
a few times, but found it *way* too frustrating!) Fortunately, the problem will
be gre
Hi Shevek,
> I just make sure to precede every partcombine instruction with a \tag for the
> score it pertains to.
I used to use the \tag mechanism a lot, before I discovered the
edition-engraver.
Now I almost never use them — I find they clutter up my content code.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan wrote
>> it would be less readable, because it obscures the
>> musical reason for combining or separating staves.
>
> Not sure I understand your meaning…?
> What is an example of a musical reason, *not* part of the presentation
> layer, for combining/separating staves?
Well, it i
Hi Shevek,
> Well, it is part of the presentation layer, but the specific decision of how
> to combine parts in a particular passage depends on what the music is. If I
> decide one to day to change a unison passage to octaves, then the next to
> make it solo, and after that to make it dovetail con
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Charles Winston
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Chords in LilyPond
> Hi LilyPond users,
> I’m participating in the Google Summer of Code working on improving
LilyPond’s internal representation of chords.
Thanks for the help! I
23 matches
Mail list logo