RE: Notation in Soprano Clef

2019-11-01 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
David Kastrup, Thank you for your kind attention to my request. I shall attempt both of your procedures. Mark -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2019 4:33 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Notation in

Re: Notation in Soprano Clef

2019-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: > Hello all, > > > > A C.P.E. Bach Piano sonata has the upper staff written with the soprano > clef. > > My skill at reading music in soprano clef is minimal. So I am attempting a > translation to treble clef. > > Does Lilypond have means to assist in this task?

Re: Notation in Soprano Clef

2019-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: > Hello all, > > > > A C.P.E. Bach Piano sonata has the upper staff written with the soprano > clef. > > My skill at reading music in soprano clef is minimal. So I am attempting a > translation to treble clef. > > Does Lilypond have means to assist in this task?

Notation in Soprano Clef

2019-11-01 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Hello all, A C.P.E. Bach Piano sonata has the upper staff written with the soprano clef. My skill at reading music in soprano clef is minimal. So I am attempting a translation to treble clef. Does Lilypond have means to assist in this task? Thank you, Mark soprano.pdf Description:

Re: Table of Contents in Two Columns?

2019-11-01 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 01.11.19 22:33, Solomon Foster wrote: Any hints how to do this?  I've got to say, at this point I feel like not really understanding markup / markuplist is my major obstacle to getting things done.  I can't even tell in this is a simple problem I'm asking or a subtle and difficult one.

Table of Contents in Two Columns?

2019-11-01 Thread Solomon Foster
Hi all, Thanks so much for the earlier help on things I needed to get a tune book up and running. At this point I'm successfully generating a fully functional 122 page tune book, and I'm just looking for ways to improve the appearance of things a tad. Perhaps the biggest one (and one that will,

Re: Error using layout control

2019-11-01 Thread Urs Liska
Am 1. November 2019 18:57:37 MEZ schrieb Peter Toye : >I'm trying to find out exactly what grobs are produced as one point ins >a score, so tried engraving with layout control and "display grob >names" ticked on the layout control. For the record: this refers to the Frescobaldi functionality

Error using layout control

2019-11-01 Thread Peter Toye
I'm trying to find out exactly what grobs are produced as one point ins a score, so tried engraving with layout control and "display grob names" ticked on the layout control. And got this on the log: warning: no such internal option: debug-grob-names Processing

Re: octavating slurs

2019-11-01 Thread David Wright
On Fri 01 Nov 2019 at 13:51:49 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 01.11.19 00:10, David Olson wrote: > > This is for sight-singing fun; I'll hand out a song sheet, we'll > > spend 2 or 3 minutes on this, once through, then sing something > > else. > > > > So, for the basses who take the profound

Re: octavating slurs

2019-11-01 Thread David Olson
> Also, doing everything to accommodate > inexperienced sight-readers can often lead to bad conclusions. Well, experienced sight-singers have certain expectations. If you are ever in Los Angeles on a Monday night, and want to attend a midnight sight-singing session, (shape note singing) let

Re: define-markup-command with variable number of arguments

2019-11-01 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Fr., 1. Nov. 2019 um 15:34 Uhr schrieb Karsten Reincke : > does anyone has / know about an example of a define-markup-command > implementation > using a variable number of arguments / parameters? Nope, optional arguments are not possible using define-markup-command. > Unfortunately, in my

Re: Ricochet bowing articulations

2019-11-01 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Il some output problems occur, please try: \version "2.19.83" #(define-markup-command (ric-mkp layout props note)(ly:music?) (interpret-markup layout props #{ \markup { \override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5) \left-column { \line { \hspace #1 \teeny\bold

define-markup-command with variable number of arguments

2019-11-01 Thread Karsten Reincke
Dear friends; does anyone has / know about an example of a define-markup-command implementation using a variable number of arguments / parameters? Unfortunately, in my system (Linux Ubuntu 19.10 with Lilypond 2.18...) the normal GUILE / scheme syntax (define (x y . args) ) (doanythingwith

Re: octavating slurs

2019-11-01 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 01.11.19 13:57, David Kastrup wrote: Usually there are either separate voices (in which case you want separate stems) or not (like in a piano extract done with the voice combiner). This kind of an optional bass octave at deliberation of the singer is sort of a weird middle case. Not in

Re: Ricochet bowing articulations

2019-11-01 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
You're welcome Ben. Simply enter values of "b" (which should remain the same) from full to 16th note. Minimum is 3 values, so 3 dots. Either e.g. b16( b b) or b16( 16 16) is ok. Higher values (32, 64, 128) won't show thinner spaces. If only two values are entered, (e.. b16( 16)) the output does

Re: octavating slurs

2019-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 01.11.19 00:10, David Olson wrote: >> This is for sight-singing fun; I'll hand out a song sheet, we'll >> spend 2 or 3 minutes on this, once through, then sing something >> else. >> >> So, for the basses who take the profound option, it would be nice if >> there was a

Re: octavating slurs

2019-11-01 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 01.11.19 00:10, David Olson wrote: This is for sight-singing fun; I'll hand out a song sheet, we'll spend 2 or 3 minutes on this, once through, then sing something else. So, for the basses who take the profound option, it would be nice if there was a slur symbol right where their eyes are

Re: how to implement the snippet in the attachment

2019-11-01 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 31.10.19 15:32, DJF wrote: \relative c'' { \key f \major <<{bes2 ~ 8 4} \\ {r4 ~ \hideNotes 8 \unHideNotes s8 s4 } >> } Code formatting matters. The above may be legible to LilyPond, and maybe you’re used to that style, but if you’re sharing code, please stick to the standards evident

Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL

2019-11-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 2019-11-01 um 12:16 schrieb J Martin Rushton > : > > On 01/11/2019 10:45, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> BTW there is _no_ copyright on the design of sheet music, even if some music >> publishers claim it. > > This depends upon the country. In the UK: "The typographical > arrangement of

Re: Ricochet bowing articulations

2019-11-01 Thread Ben
On 11/1/2019 6:00 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Simplified: \version "2.19.83" #(define-markup-command (ric-mkp layout props note)(ly:music?)   (interpret-markup layout props    #{      \markup {         \override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5)         \left-column         {           \line {

Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL

2019-11-01 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 01/11/2019 10:45, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > > BTW there is _no_ copyright on the design of sheet music, even if some music > publishers claim it. > This depends upon the country. In the UK: "The typographical arrangement of a published edition lasts for 25 years from first

Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL

2019-11-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 2019-10-31 um 03:15 schrieb Carl Sorensen : > > In the US, a typeface is not copyrightable. But a computer program that > makes a font or its glyphs is copyrightable. The "program code" of fonts is juristically not regarded a program, because it is usually auto-generated by a design

Re: Ricochet bowing articulations

2019-11-01 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Simplified: \version "2.19.83" #(define-markup-command (ric-mkp layout props note)(ly:music?) (interpret-markup layout props #{ \markup { \override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5) \left-column { \line { \hspace #2 \teeny\bold "ric." } \score {

Fedora 31, Python3, Frescobaldi

2019-11-01 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
Just upgraded to Fedora 31. Maybe this is not the right place to report this, but I'm seeing this in my terminal when updating my packages: Problem 1: package frescobaldi-3.0.0-10.fc31.noarch requires python3-sip, but none of the providers can be installed - package