At 15:28 on 05 Mar 2023, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hello All,
> I can't help feeling a twinge of schadenfreude on hearing this. :-)
> Although one can impose such restrictions in Discourse, you don't have
> to unless you are constrained by organisational problems as here with
> GNU. As to my
It was a joke.
Andrew
On 6/03/2023 12:43 am, David Kastrup wrote:
I don't really see how "schadenfreude" scales to the problem space.
Hello Andrew,
I suppose a system that requires by a large factor more resources for
installation that it requires to run is not really a good way to do it.
Renting an 8GB Server when you only need that 8GB for setup sounds a bit daft.
I do not know if renting a server dedicated to managing a
On 2023-03-04 19:15, Werner LEMBERG
wrote:
who has ever used option `--show-rules` of `convert-ly`, except for
being curious what this option does?
In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1854 we are
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Hello All,
>
> I can't help feeling a twinge of schadenfreude on hearing this. :-)
>
> Although one can impose such restrictions in Discourse, you don't have
> to unless you are constrained by organisational problems as here with
> GNU.
Do you really think that the
Hello,
I am trying to switch the vertical stacking order of the upbow symbol
and the trillspan in the following fragment by overriding the
script-priority of the upbow symbol.
The upbow symbol should be the topmost.
\version "2.22.1"
\relative a'' {
g1\startTrillSpan ( ~
\once \override
Le dimanche 05 mars 2023 à 15:56 +0100, Arjen a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to switch the vertical stacking order of the upbow symbol
> and the trillspan in the following fragment by overriding the script-
> priority of the upbow symbol.
> The upbow symbol should be the topmost.
>
>
Le dimanche 05 mars 2023 à 13:43 -0500, Mark Mathias a écrit :
> My guess as to why the script-priority isn't a solution is that it decides
> between competing scripts and the trill spanner isn't a script. Whereas
> outside-staff-priority evaluates competing values of all objects of whatever
>
2.25.2:
I understand polymetric notation (NR 1,2,3). I have a piece which has a
polymetric section in the middle where the rest of the piece is not
polymetric. Some parts have the same time signature for the whole piece.
At the point where the polymetric section begins and ends I want to
Thank you for your quick reply.
I need/the first situation of NR 1.2.3: "Different time signatures with
equal-length measures." enablePolymeter defeats this./
/
/
Some instruments have all 2/4; some have 2/4, then 6/8 and then 2/4 again.
/
/
Paul
/
/
On 3/5/23 10:41 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le dimanche 05 mars 2023 à 10:17 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit :
> 2.25.2:
>
> I understand polymetric notation (NR 1,2,3). I have a piece which has a
> polymetric section in the middle where the rest of the piece is not
> polymetric. Some parts have the same time signature for the whole piece.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Arjen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to switch the vertical stacking order of the upbow symbol and
> the trillspan in the following fragment by overriding the script-priority
> of the upbow symbol.
> The upbow symbol should be the topmost.
>
> \version "2.22.1"
>
Thanks!
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 1:47 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le dimanche 05 mars 2023 à 13:43 -0500, Mark Mathias a écrit :
>
> My guess as to why the script-priority isn't a solution is that it decides
> between competing scripts and the trill spanner isn't a script. Whereas
>
Le dimanche 05 mars 2023 à 11:19 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit :
> Thank you for your quick reply.
>
> I need the first situation of NR 1.2.3: "Different time signatures
> with equal-length measures." enablePolymeter defeats this.
>
> Some instruments have all 2/4; some have 2/4, then 6/8 and then
As I might have guessed, Jean's solution is even easier! Also, I presumed
you wanted the trill to extend through the upbow to the acciaccatura, but
that was probably not what you wanted.
My guess as to why the script-priority isn't a solution is that it decides
between competing scripts and the
Well you can dynamically increase CPU or RAM or both on Digitalocean
that I use. You can do it on a temporary basis - but I'm not sure if you
get charged for a month or on a strict time basis, it's hard to find
out!. It's not a matter of needing a separate system. My only issue is
that I am
No. You misunderstand. Discourse is quite compact. The 8GB of RAM is
only required temporarily for importing 20+ years worth of mbox files.
My Discourse servers all run fine in 2GB of RAM, with unlimited posts,
which are just in a database on disk.
On 6/03/2023 3:04 am, Valentin Petzel wrote:
I should add that a normal fresh install does not require large RAM.
It's only the mbox import script. I think it's poorly written and does
not constrain itself when it comes to memory.
Andrew
On 6/03/2023 1:29 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
On 6/03/2023 3:04 am, Valentin Petzel wrote:
I
Andrew Bernard writes:
> I should add that a normal fresh install does not require large
> RAM. It's only the mbox import script. I think it's poorly written and
> does not constrain itself when it comes to memory.
Is it necessary to run the import on the same machine that is going to
run the
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Well you can dynamically increase CPU or RAM or both on Digitalocean
> that I use. You can do it on a temporary basis - but I'm not sure if
> you get charged for a month or on a strict time basis, it's hard to
> find out!. It's not a matter of needing a separate system.
I was finally able to get my real code to function as your example does.
Thank you very much,
Paul
On 3/5/23 11:29 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le dimanche 05 mars 2023 à 11:19 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit :
Thank you for your quick reply.
I need/the first situation of NR 1.2.3: "Different time
21 matches
Mail list logo
