Re: Removing time signatures (yet again!)

2007-12-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Ole Schmidt wrote: Am 16.12.2007 um 22:56 schrieb Mats Bengtsson: There are several other alternatives to do this kind of property settings, for example if want to make one setting that applies to all staves of all scores. would this be a correct solution? Certainly! I deliberatly did

Re: OS X 10.5 SDK

2007-12-17 Thread Maurits Lamers
Assuming you have already tried it out, the standard SDK does not link properly, then? Would downloading and compiling the appropriate sources from http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5/ do any magic? I will try and create a GUB building environment under Linux, using the

Re: moving dynamics

2007-12-17 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear Mats, sorry, I thought the information I gave was enough. Below I woll quote the complete file. The problem is: I can't move the dynamic vertically. I tried it with different contexts in the override commando, but without any success. Ans the crescendo has now disappeared, I dont know why.

Re: Cannot set MIDI tempo Programmatically

2007-12-17 Thread Gilles THIBAULT
I think you have to rewrite your own \tempo function. I try this which seems to works. % \version 2.11.34 \include english.ly tempoAlt = #(define-music-function (parser location Duration Tempo) (string? string?) ( let*( (ptindex (string-index Duration #\.

Re: Cannot set MIDI tempo Programmatically

2007-12-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
If this looked very magic, please take a look at the section Building complicated functions, which shows a systematic way to figure out what functions to use. /Mats Gilles THIBAULT wrote: I think you have to rewrite your own \tempo function. I try this which seems to works.

Re: OS X 10.5 SDK

2007-12-17 Thread Hans Aberg
On 17 Dec 2007, at 10:10, Maurits Lamers wrote: I will try and create a GUB building environment under Linux, using the standard SDK. Maybe I will find something. What is this GUB you are using? Hans Åberg ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: OS X 10.5 SDK

2007-12-17 Thread Michael David Crawford
Maurits Lamers wrote: I tried to find the source code for LilyPad OSX, but could not find it under the GUB sources. Do you know where I could find the most recent source code (and Xcode project?). There are some LilyPad sources at: http://lilypond.org/download/gub-sources/OSX-LilyPad/ But

Re: OS X 10.5 SDK

2007-12-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Michael David Crawford wrote: There are some LilyPad sources at: http://lilypond.org/download/gub-sources/OSX-LilyPad/ But the version is 0.0, and the tarball is almost two years old. Does anyone have a more recent tarball? In http://lilypond.org/download/gub-sources/, you can also find

Re: OS X 10.5 SDK

2007-12-17 Thread Hans Aberg
On 17 Dec 2007, at 03:33, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: That's not the problem. The problem is that we have to have a versions of the tools that runs on Linux. Have you tried getting this builder integrated into some other GNU project? Hans Åberg

Ugly fonts in 2.11.36

2007-12-17 Thread Cesar Penagos
I'm win. XP user, and recently upgrade from 2.11.34 to 2.11.36. and for my surprise the fonts are totally changed in this version; from the very nice Century; to an horrendous Arial or maybe Courier font in the time signatures, the text all, and lyrics. Is this a new font to be used with LP? Is

Re: Ugly fonts in 2.11.36

2007-12-17 Thread Francisco Vila
2007/12/17, Cesar Penagos [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm win. XP user, and recently upgrade from 2.11.34 to 2.11.36. and for my surprise the fonts are totally changed in this version; from the very nice Century; to an horrendous Arial or maybe Courier font in the time signatures, the text all, and

Re: tuplets other than standard 8th into quarter note

2007-12-17 Thread Ole Schmidt
and for saving typing you can use \set tupletSpannerDuration ... (as described in the manual Chapter 6.2.3 Tuplets) % \version 2.10.15 \new Staff { \time 2/4 \relative c'{ \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) \times 4/6 { c16 d e d e f f g a g a

Re: moving dynamics

2007-12-17 Thread Stefan Thomas
Daer Mats, thank You. I've read Your e-mail and the text of the link and I think I can understand the most much better and I was able to make the changes I wanted. Just one question about version 2.11.x: Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP? Thanks Stefan Mats Bengtsson schrieb am

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 61, Issue 39

2007-12-17 Thread Maurits Lamers
Hi all, Michael David Crawford wrote: There are some LilyPad sources at: http://lilypond.org/download/gub-sources/OSX-LilyPad/ But the version is 0.0, and the tarball is almost two years old. Does anyone have a more recent tarball? In http://lilypond.org/download/gub-sources/, you can

Re: moving dynamics

2007-12-17 Thread Gilles THIBAULT
Just one question about version 2.11.x: Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP? The 2.11.34 is very stable and works very well. From this version (2.11.35, 2.11.36), some fonts problems in XP. (see previous users messages) Gilles. ___

Re: OS X 10.5 SDK

2007-12-17 Thread Maurits Lamers
Hi, It turns out Lilypond is not working as it should. Running Lilypond with correct paths errors with the following message: /opt/local/share/guile/1.8/srfi/srfi-1.scm:223:1: In procedure dynamic- link in expression (load-extension libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3 scm_init_srfi_1):

making the actual music

2007-12-17 Thread henry
i just downloaded this today, and tried fiddling with a few notes...i just can't figure out how to make the actual sheet music document. also, how do you get the view seen in the sample, the on one with the three windows (one with the code, one with the sheet music and one with some other

Re: making the actual music

2007-12-17 Thread Peter Wright
On 18/12 03:35:48, henry wrote: i just downloaded this today, and tried fiddling with a few notes...i just can't figure out how to make the actual sheet music document. Start with a Lilypond text file, eg. bling.ly, then run (from a command line) lilypond bling.ly - it should create (among

Re: Ugly fonts in 2.11.36

2007-12-17 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Dear Paco Cesar, Paco Vila wrote: 2007/12/17, Cesar Penagos [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm win. XP user, and recently upgrade from 2.11.34 to 2.11.36. and for my surprise the fonts are totally changed in this version; from the very nice Century; to an horrendous Arial or maybe Courier font in