I found the snippet for
\set Staff.keySignature = #`((6 . ,(- KOMA)))
and got it to compile from the snippet however once I used the (I think) same
setup for a piece I was transcribing the piece won't compile it complains about
the bes' in the music.
So what is bes called when you use this
Jay Hamilton wrote:
I found the snippet for
\set Staff.keySignature = #`((6 . ,(- KOMA)))
and got it to compile from the snippet however once I used the (I think) same
setup for a piece I was transcribing the piece won't compile it complains
about the bes' in the music.
So what is bes
I don't see any straightforward way of seeing a changelog or
anything which tells the differences between minor releases.
I think I can justify x.x.1 on one machine and x.x.2 on
another, but I would like to know what the differences are
to avoid open manholes. Is there a CHANGELOG somewhere,
and
Thanks, I really had to study that snippet to get how to make it work. And
you are right es is wrong -
Jay
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Joseph Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
Jay Hamilton wrote:
I found the snippet for
\set Staff.keySignature = #`((6 . ,(- KOMA)))
and
Hello
Any hint on how to produce the output similar to the one in the picture?
(regarding the small bar and ff bellow).
Thanks
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
inline:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:48:53AM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
I don't see any straightforward way of seeing a changelog or
anything which tells the differences between minor releases.
The git log messages.
I think I can justify x.x.1 on one machine and x.x.2 on
another, but I would
2009/8/15 Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de:
thank you for your solutions! Are there any typographical
rules/recommendations for the style of string indication number extenders.
In my guitar editions I can find both solid and dashed lines.
I don't have the slightest idea, I'm afraid; the
2009/8/16 Jay Hamilton jay...@linuxquestions.net:
Thanks, I really had to study that snippet to get how to make it work. And
you are right es is wrong -
Can you suggest any improvements for this snippet's documentation? It
does already mention where the pitch names are defined (ly/makam.ly).
On 2009-08-12, Graham Percival wrote:
I'm not certain if the question was clear, so let's do this again
and put it to a vote.
These two images have the same top-level menu item selected.
Which is easier to see?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png
freeman gilmore wrote:
I have instald Lily Pond and Jedit. I have Lily Pond Tools extracted and
placed were Lily pond is placed in program Files as instruted. Also I have
tryed to find then with Program Manager/ instal, not on the list. Help?
Are you on Windows?
Well, jEdit might not
I have instald Lily Pond and Jedit. I have Lily Pond Tools extracted and
placed were Lily pond is placed in program Files as instruted. Also I have
tryed to find then with Program Manager/ instal, not on the list. Help?
Thanks,
ƒg
___
Freeman Gilmore wrote:
From the Plugin Manager, did you click on the Install tab?
If LilyPondTool is not in the Manage list, it should
certainly be in the Install list...
Mark:
They are not on the Plugin Manager list.
Well, that's very strange. When you click on the Install tab,
does
This is a bug in gs. If the Japanese font contains embedded
bitmaps, they are not subsetted (as done with all outline glyphs)
in the PDF but output completely. The recent version of gs, 8.70,
should simply strip these bitmaps,[1] yielding much smaller PDF
files.
It does not work for me
13 matches
Mail list logo