You would do something like:
\new Staff \with {\consists Rehearsal_mark_engraver}
I can't recall if that is the exact name of the engraver right off.
Of course, that would put all \marks above the given staff.
On 10/30/09, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
>> I just checked Honegger's score f
Hi Jay,
I just checked Honegger's score for Jeanne d'Arc and tempo marks
are above the top staff and then below for the strings. I've
looked in the manual 2.12 and snippets and I don't see a way to do
this.
I tried setting it for the top instrument in each group and that
did not work.
I just checked Honegger's score for Jeanne d'Arc and tempo marks are above the
top staff and then below for the strings. I've looked in the manual 2.12 and
snippets and I don't see a way to do this.
I tried setting it for the top instrument in each group and that did not work.
Thanks
Yours-
Ja
bradford powell wrote Sunday, October 25, 2009 2:32 AM
I would appreciate any comments. One area in particular that I
have
questions about is cleaning up the case statement that converts
pitch
to markup-- specifically in that I am weirdly interspersing
lilypond
syntax (with the '(markup #:fl
Hello
Any easier/compacter way to do
d8 -\tweak #'X-offset #-6 -\tweak #'Y-offset #-2 -\mf
Thanks :)
ALberto
Alberto Simões
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:44:16PM -0300, Leonardo Herrera wrote:
> Well, I offer my help as web monkey. I don't have time for big
> commitments, but little things (small rendering errors, missing links,
> etc.) I can do.
Great! Let's tackle the Features page first:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:01:24PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Unfortunately, I haven't figured out how to add the tweaks suggested by
> Graham.
> So if someone else is able to do it, he's free to emprove the (attached)
> file (read the TODO section in the beginning).
Ok, well, I give up. I'
Op vrijdag 30 oktober 2009 schreef Ian:
> I've noticed that LilypondTool and Frescobaldi can get fooled using
> their internal pdf viewers about where the successfully compiled output is.
>
> I wonder if you editor guys can take an enhancement to make your PDF
> viewers sensitive to the code wr
Thanks, added. I'd rather keep the links, for added readability
in (espeically printed) pdf docs.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:50:09PM +0100, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Alternate-input.html the
> Frescobaldi description is
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Don't feel bad. I have a Masters in Computer Science and I don't understand
Scheme at all in spite of having an AI class that used Scheme about a
million years ago.
Yes, don't feel bad. Des
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote:
>>
>> I am so sorry
>> that I did not study computer science so that I would understand scheme
>> coding, but to my greatest misfortune it is above my capabiblities.
>
> Don't feel bad. I have a Masters in Compute
Jiri Zurek (Prague) wrote:
...elision by Patrick ... I am so sorry
that I did not study computer science so that I would understand scheme
coding, but to my greatest misfortune it is above my capabiblities. I am
alone to be blamed for this, but this is the reason that I am looking for
someone to
This is a heads up for those like Bert and Wilbert who write editing
support environments for Lilypond.
I currently have a patch in for review which will allow Lily to redirect
the backend output to another file for particular \book blocks.
Currently you do this by setting environment variable
But in 4/4 with partial? I don't have access to lily now but i think i saw that
failing.
Original message
From: Mats Bengtsson
Sent: 30 Oct 2009 10:00 +01:00
To: Bertalan Fodor
Cc: Erik Appeldoorn ,
Subject: Re: centering rests
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> I think that's a bug as R
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
> The resulting pdf looks fine but I’m open to feedback. Would anyone be
> tempted to give it the once over and give that feedback?
I'm not sure what you mean by that; I can have a look at your code if
you send me the .ly files. (I'm not an
Can I tempt anyone?
After learning on one voice only pieces, I have now finished my first
multi-voice / multi-file piece.
The resulting pdf looks fine but I'm open to feedback. Would anyone be
tempted to give it the once over and give that feedback?
Some info on the project:
For my choir
"Jiri Zurek (Prague)" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> I happen to be the author of a LaTeX style file that typesets
>> footnotes,
>>
> This is EXCELLENT. Do you know that
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-lilyp...@gnu.org/msg13795.html I
> offered sponsorship for someone who would built fo
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I recommend magic. At some point of time reality has to intrude. If
> there is no way to find an arrangement meeting all requirements by hand,
> the computer can do no better.
>
I do not think I am trying to do something magical. Although I have to admit
with great re
Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
>
> Thanks again all. I found the problem
>
> \new Staff = "Sopraan" {
> \set Staff.instrumentName = #"Sopraan"
> \sop
> }
>
> Should be
>
> \new Staff = "Sopraan" <<
> \set Staff.instrumentName = #"Sopraan"
> \sop
> >>
>
> And all l
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I happen to be the author of a LaTeX style file that typesets
>> footnotes, [...]
>
> BTW, it is called `bigfoot', and is one of the most ingenious LaTeX
> packages IMHO.
Its documentation is lousy.
--
David Kastrup
___
l
> I happen to be the author of a LaTeX style file that typesets
> footnotes, [...]
BTW, it is called `bigfoot', and is one of the most ingenious LaTeX
packages IMHO.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
"Jiri Zurek (Prague)" writes:
> Dear David,
> thank you for your valuable opinion but, in my case, the text needs to
> be justified and the music inside markuplines should wrap along the
> lines of the surrounding text. I am using it for a musicological
> apparatus accompanying the piece and if t
Peer review requested!
I've added a snippet to LSR, showcasing my absolute brilliance in
coding Scheme (hey, it's the first thing I've ever done in the
language - gimme a break!!), to solve a problem between vanBasco's
Karaoke Player for Windows, and the printed score. Am I going about
things enti
Thanks again all. I found the problem
\new Staff = "Sopraan" {
\set Staff.instrumentName = #"Sopraan"
\sop
}
Should be
\new Staff = "Sopraan" <<
\set Staff.instrumentName = #"Sopraan"
\sop
>>
And all looks well now. Probably have more questions la
Dear David,
thank you for your valuable opinion but, in my case, the text needs to be
justified and the music inside markuplines should wrap along the lines of
the surrounding text. I am using it for a musicological apparatus
accompanying the piece and if the systems of the piece and other texts o
Eluze
Thanks for the explanation, but solving one problem creates a new one.
The names of the staves now are correct. But the lyrics belonging to the
notes are completely misplaced. Lyrics of voices now get collected all in
one go below the bass staff.
More to learn I guess. Here is how it is lo
Mats,
Bracket problem solved
I just miscounted the place for the closing >>
It now looks slightly different and brackets are in place as I want them.
But still no names before the staffs
Thanks, Erik
> -Original Message-
> From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se]
> Sent: v
Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
>
>
> 2nd I'm missing the names of the voices before the staves although I use
> the
> \set Staff.instrumentName.
>
if yout set the instrument names *before* the notes they will be displayed:
\new Staff = "Sopraan" {
\set Staff.instrumentName = #"Sopraan"
"Jiri Zurek (Prague)" writes:
> your tweak of the score inside markup is indeed a GREAT improvement. I
> altered the scm/define-markup-commands.scm according to you suggestion
> and the score inside markuplines is now split into multiple lines as
> necessary. Nevertheless, for flawless output, I
Erik Appeldoorn wrote:
I have a snipped of code that doesn’t quite come out is expected /
wanted. The score is a choir SATB with organ (two staffs)
I would like the normal bracket to be in front of the SATB staffs. It
now extends to the last staf.
Yes, since you include all the staves wi
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
>> wrote:
>
> there is the same issue with Konqueror 4
>
>> If anyone has a more portable fix, please let me know.
>>
>
> I would use this solution, it's repo
I have a snipped of code that doesn't quite come out is expected / wanted.
The score is a choir SATB with organ (two staffs)
I would like the normal bracket to be in front of the SATB staffs. It now
extends to the last staf.
2nd I'm missing the names of the voices before the staves although
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
I think that's a bug as R2 is not centered.
??? An R2 is certainly centered within the measure if you have 2/4 time:
<<
\new Staff \relative c'{ \time 2/4 c8 d e f }
\new Staff {R2 }
>>
However, as was pointed out by Kieren, a half note rest in the beginning
of a
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2009 17:23:18 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
Am Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2009 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Federico Bruni
wrote:
I have to admit I'm pr
I think that's a bug as R2 is not centered.
Original message
From: Erik Appeldoorn
Sent: 29 Oct 2009 18:39 +01:00
To: 'Kieren MacMillan'
Cc:
Subject: RE: centering rests
You are quite right, and I have never even bothered to check. Although I
have a quite substantial library and a
Dear Neil,
your tweak of the score inside markup is indeed a GREAT improvement. I
altered the scm/define-markup-commands.scm according to you suggestion and
the score inside markuplines is now split into multiple lines as necessary.
Nevertheless, for flawless output, I can see still one problem, r
36 matches
Mail list logo
