On Tue 05 Jul 2011, 13:35 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hey Eluze,
i think Kieren's solution works if you override the property of the
TextScript in its real context which seems to be the Voice context:
D'oh!
Sorry for the noise… thanks for the correction!
I doubt if either could help, if
Following the 'official' snippet on how to change the default text font family,
I try:
\paper {
myStaffSize = #20
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree Times New Roman
Helvetica
Courier
(/ myStaffSize 20)))
}
\relative c'' {
c4^\markup {
Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 05.07.2011 18:17, schrieb -Eluze:
[...]
i think Kieren's solution works if you override the property of the
TextScript in its real context which seems to be the Voice context:
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\override TextScript #'font-size = #-12
} }
Am 06.07.2011 11:58, schrieb -Eluze:
Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 05.07.2011 18:17, schrieb -Eluze:
[...]
i think Kieren's solution works if you override the property of the
TextScript in its real context which seems to be the Voice context:
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\override
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 05:13:57 -0400
From: Hwaen Ch'uqi hwaench...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Regarding \break and multimeasure rests.
Message-ID:
CAFRM3_2Ly4Ag-B11xCF18xY1pJkv-Eb_=h6g2ckcvdy-eb7...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
A cool LilyPond editing mode has now been merged into Emacs' org-mode
http://twitter.com/mjago/status/88562469731188736
And a grand Sibelius/LilyPond score rewrite
http://twitter.com/adamscottneal/status/88641699731091456
Greetings, Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU
2011/7/3 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org:
I don't write much music for transposing instruments, so i cannot give
any advice, but i have a question that may trigger a discussion: how
to prepare scores with transposing instruments so that they are
structurally correct? Consider
On Mi., 6. Jul. 2011 21:10:51 CEST, Janek Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
The last one.
In the first one, the vertical strike looks too straight. The second one feels
unbalanced and looks loke it's falling over to
Janek,
I personally prefer the first one, then the third one, then the second one.
The third looks like it's twisting in on itself, but still feels more
balanced than the second one, which is tilted too far to the right. I find
the first more balanced than the third, but only very slightly. My 2¢
Janek,
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Janek
Warchoł [lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 July 2011 20:10
To: lilypond-user
Subject: font survey:
On 6 Jul 2011, at 21:10, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
Examples from Edition Peters (Bach) and Schirmer (Muczynski) have the top tip
and the lowest crossing aligned pretty much vertically. A book by Hindemith,
though smaller in type, typeset
On 07/06/2011 12:10 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
I prefer the 3rd one. I don't like the size (too big and fat) of the
top loop on the 1st one.
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
I like the 3rd one best.
--
MT
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The one on the right. The one on the left is taller and would
potentially affect the intra-staff spacing. Better to avoid this.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011
I prefer the second one.
In the first, the space outlined by the top loop of the clef and the top
line of the staff is too large, and the third just appears too 'grainy' to
me for some reason (although I find it hard to spot any differences between
it and the second).
Brent.
On 6 July 2011
Hello
From: Janek Warchoł [lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 July 2011 21:53
To: James Lowe
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: font survey: which clef do you prefer?
W dniu 6 lipca 2011 22:21 użytkownik James Lowe
james.l...@datacore.com napisał:
Can
On Jul 6, 2011, at 15:53, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
W dniu 6 lipca 2011 22:21 użytkownik James Lowe
james.l...@datacore.com napisał:
Can we have some sharps and flats and perhaps some numeric signatures?
There is no context for the clef otherwise (if you see what
Il 06/07/2011 21:10, Janek Warchoł ha scritto:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
Hmm. I prefer the central one, I find in it more of the shape of the
original 'G' letter and it seems more balanced to me.
Luca
cheers,
Janek
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:53:51 +0200
From: Janek Warcho? lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: font survey: which clef do you prefer?
Message-ID:
On 7/07/2011, at 7:10 am, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
I don't like the left one: the top loop is far too big.
Of the other two, I marginally prefer the upright stance of the centre one over
the more 'laid-back' style of the right one.
Best
At Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:11:14 -0400,
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:24:58 +0200
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: bits from twitter #lilypond
A cool LilyPond editing mode has now been merged into Emacs'
What exactly does 'keep lilypond open' mean in this context? It just runs
once, sprouts a pdf and then stops. That's why I can't understand what else
would be running unless we have a memory leak somewhere?
LilyPad is as far as I can see a very lightweight editor (and much easier
to
Jay Lee jkllee at mac.com writes:
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
snip
And if you want to used a lilypond flat symbol, you can do that as
well.
You'll need to make the fingering a lilypond markup.
snip
Anybody? Or is it really not possible?
Was just playing around with cues, and got it mostly figured out (thanks to the
great documentation). But I'm stuck on one point --
In the bit pasted below my signature, if I were writing this by hand, I would
add a \laissezVibrer tie to the last note of the cue, but omit the note at the
other
I like the third one.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2011/7/7 James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com:
A cool LilyPond editing mode has now been merged into Emacs' org-mode
http://twitter.com/mjago/status/88562469731188736
Do you have a non-twitter link for this (for those of us living behind the
Great Firewall of China)? I can sometimes get
On Wed 06 Jul 2011, 21:10 Janek Warchoł wrote:
Which one of the clefs in the attachment do you like best?
The first one.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug Squad
Easy to use is easy to say.
--Jeff Garbers
On Wed 06 Jul 2011, 22:53 Janek Warchoł wrote:
W dniu 6 lipca 2011 22:21 użytkownik James Lowe
james.l...@datacore.com napisał:
Can we have some sharps and flats and perhaps some numeric signatures?
There is no context for the clef otherwise (if you see what I mean).
Attached.
The third
28 matches
Mail list logo
