When I've finished a jazz chart, I'll want to produce separate parts for
several transposing instruments, but while I'm working on the entry of the
melody and chords in concert pitch I only need to produce one .pdf file.
Obviously, I can comment out the sections I don't want during data entry
Am 18.02.2012 00:30, schrieb Michael Hendry:
Obviously, I can comment out the sections I don't want during data entry
work, and remove the comments once the work is complete, but it would be
handy to be able to use a C-like construct like this:
#DEFINE NotYet
...
#IFNDEF NotYet
\book {
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
When I've finished a jazz chart, I'll want to produce separate parts
for several transposing instruments, but while I'm working on the
entry of the melody and chords in concert pitch I only need to produce
one .pdf file. Obviously, I can comment
Helge Kruse-2 wrote:
Am 18.02.2012 00:30, schrieb Michael Hendry:
Obviously, I can comment out the sections I don't want during data entry
work, and remove the comments once the work is complete, but it would be
handy to be able to use a C-like construct like this:
#DEFINE NotYet
...
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:54:15 -0600
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tiresia,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Tiresia GIUNO
tires...@googlemail.comwrote:
\override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##t
I find the circles a bit too small. Is there a way to customize the
Hi Tiresia,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Tiresia GIUNO tires...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi David,
thanks a lot for your help. I don't understand anything of Scheme. I
can't get your code working. Do I need 2.15.16? I'm working with 2.14
Here the error message:
GNU LilyPond 2.14.2
Apologies for top-posting - I'm having problems with the way my Windows
machine is quoting text.
Also apologies, Thomas, for the late reply, and pointing you to a page
yesterday that you'd already read! It was getting past my bedtime and I
wasn't reading too accurately.
It looks like what
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
2) correct the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
move. Which you do is up to you - bear in mind that if you go for 2),
then it's possible that the work will be wasted if we struggle to
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:58:23 +0100
From: Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of #define ... #ifndef ... #endif
in lilypond?
Message-ID: 4f40b9af.5040...@gmx.net
Content-Type: text/plain;
Hello,
Is there any way to force two whole notes, from different voices, to
merge their head?
Tried
\mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn
\mergeDifferentlyDottedOn
none did work.
Is there any flag I am missing?
Or should I go for an engineering solution? (putting a silence in one of
the voices).
I first suggested to put the column code because I think it would be probably
useful.
The polychord snippets would need a little more work, as I advance in the
theory class, i'll know which cases are pertinent to add, but still it could be
a good example.
I didn't realized there were two
Hi dears lilyponders!
For to remove stem is this \override Staff.Stem #'transparent = ##t
But how can i do to remove the selected image?
Thanks!
--
oiram/bin/selom
Da ognuno secondo le proprie capacità ad ognuno secondo i propri bisogni.attachment:
Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
Hello,
Is there any way to force two whole notes, from different voices, to
merge their head?
Uh what? How would you figure out that they are from both voices?
--
David Kastrup
___
Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it writes:
Hi dears lilyponders!
For to remove stem is this \override Staff.Stem #'transparent = ##t
But how can i do to remove the selected image?
By overriding Flag in addition to Stem?
--
David Kastrup
___
On 19/02/12 15:34, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
Hello,
Is there any way to force two whole notes, from different voices, to
merge their head?
Uh what? How would you figure out that they are from both voices?
I am not composing. I am
Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
On 19/02/12 15:34, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
Hello,
Is there any way to force two whole notes, from different voices, to
merge their head?
Uh what? How would you figure out that they are
On 19/02/12 15:49, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
On 19/02/12 15:34, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
Hello,
Is there any way to force two whole notes, from different voices, to
merge their head?
Uh
In data domenica 19 febbraio 2012 16:36:18, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it writes:
Hi dears lilyponders!
For to remove stem is this \override Staff.Stem #'transparent = ##t
But how can i do to remove the selected image?
By overriding Flag in addition to
Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
On 19/02/12 15:49, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
On 19/02/12 15:34, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
Hello,
Is there any way to force two whole
On 19/02/12 15:54, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
On 19/02/12 15:49, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt writes:
On 19/02/12 15:34, David Kastrup wrote:
Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.ptwrites:
Ok! But how can I avoid this?
How can I do to have a sign attached to the note?
Thanks!
In data sabato 18 febbraio 2012 07:37:36, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Two more notes: StudlyCaps are not the style used for markup commands,
you'd use contemp-sign for the markup. And putting the path in a
Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it writes:
Ok! But how can I avoid this?
How can I do to have a sign attached to the note?
Please don't toppost. Without an example to play around with, and you
obviously have such an example, it is much harder to make a useful
answer. In this case, one would
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
2) correct the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
move. Which you do is up to you - bear in mind that if you go for 2), then
Hello,
In my song basses are singing alternative lyrics (pa ba da ba) only in
a part of the song (before and after that are singing normal lyrics
with everybody else).
I was trying to figure out from the manual how to do this in Lilypond
but maybe my solution is not correct although I cannot
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
2) correct the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
move. Which you do
Hi Phil,
2012/2/19 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
It looks like what you've done is exactly right for preparing for updating
the LSR. I think you have 2 options: 1) wait until we know that the LSR
will be moved to 2.14 before doing anything else; or 2) correct the syntax
of the files you
Marteno MINIĤ marteno.min...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
In my song basses are singing alternative lyrics (pa ba da ba) only in
a part of the song (before and after that are singing normal lyrics
with everybody else).
I was trying to figure out from the manual how to do this in Lilypond
but
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
2) correct the syntax of the files you know
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/2/19 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Did you try using convert-ly?
yes. But without complete success in the mentioned files.
It may also be an idea to use this as input for improving the convert-ly
rules. After all, they will presumably
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:27:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
So if it is not too much work to collect triplets of version #, before,
after convert-ly, after correct change, it might be a nice base for
looking how to improve the convertrules file.
David, are you volunteering to produce
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:27:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
So if it is not too much work to collect triplets of version #, before,
after convert-ly, after correct change, it might be a nice base for
looking how to improve the convertrules
(re-sending this as sent wrongly previously)
Thanks David, but I'm afraid it didn't quite work.
If I do this...
---snippet1-starts-
\new Staff { \clef bass
\new Voice \relative c { c4 c s1*0 }
{
\new Voice = pabadaba
Marteno MINIĤ marteno.min...@gmail.com writes:
... it has the same effect as before (i.e. notes e and g wrongly
put on the top of each other).
If I do this...
---snippet2-starts-
\new Staff { \clef bass
\new Voice \relative c { c4 c }
{
On 2/19/12 10:51 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
2) correct the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for
that
In data domenica 19 febbraio 2012 18:45:29, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Please don't toppost. Without an example to play around with, and you
obviously have such an example, it is much harder to make a useful
answer. In this case, one would likely have to play with the priority
overrides.
Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it writes:
In data domenica 19 febbraio 2012 18:45:29, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Please don't toppost. Without an example to play around with, and you
obviously have such an example, it is much harder to make a useful
answer. In this case, one would likely
Thanks, that helps a lot!
Martin
On 19 February 2012 19:18, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Marteno MINIĤ marteno.min...@gmail.com writes:
... it has the same effect as before (i.e. notes e and g wrongly
put on the top of each other).
If I do this...
---snippet2-starts-
In data domenica 19 febbraio 2012 21:13:43, David Kastrup ha scritto:
\version 2.15.30
#(define-markup-command (contemp-sign layout props) ()
(interpret-markup layout props
#{ \markup \override #'(filled . #t) \path #'0.25
#'((moveto 0.0 0.0)
On 18 February 2012 11:51, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
I remember this coming up before, and the answer is that there is a variable
that makes start bar lines disappear when they're below a certain size.
Can't remember the details, but it must be in the archive somewhere!
Right,
On 9 February 2012 22:23, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
We developed the attached work-around.
BTW in output-lib.scm you can find brace and bracket in the
bar-glyph-alist. AFAIK they aren't used anywhere. So any work-around
has to fiddle about the line-breaks.
This a
Have you thought about how to use tags for this?
Saul
On Friday, February 17, 2012 03:30:51 PM Michael Hendry wrote:
Obviously, I can comment out the sections I don't want during data entry
work, and remove the comments once the work is complete, but it would be
handy to be able to use a
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So if it is not too much work to collect triplets of version #, before,
after convert-ly, after correct change, it might be a nice base for
looking how to improve the convertrules file.
as an example I use: overriding-automatic-beam-settings.ly
Shevek wrote:
Have you thought about how to use tags for this?
Saul
On Friday, February 17, 2012 03:30:51 PM Michael Hendry wrote:
Obviously, I can comment out the sections I don't want during data entry
work, and remove the comments once the work is complete, but it would be
handy
in the same sequence of sextuplets
1) the first time, the fingering 0 on the E collides with the slur
2) the second time, the fingering does not collide but the sextuplet number
is misplaced.
I have tested with 2.12, 2.14 and 2.15.30
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33354136/bug%2Bsextuplet.ly
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:48:05AM -0800, Michael Hendry wrote:
#DEFINE NotYet
...
#IFNDEF NotYet
\book {
\bookOutputName Chez Fernand (alto)
\new Score
\transpose f' d {\TheChords}
\new Staff
\repeat unfold 13 {
s1 \noBreak s1 \noBreak s1
I just typed another set of slurred sextuplet and the fingering appear above
the slur instead of below.
and the 6 is written on the beam
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33354245/Screen%2Bshot%2B2012-02-19%2Bat%2B7.29.16%2BPM.png
\times 4/6{ e16-0( fs gs a-1 b cs) }
\times
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
I didn't manage to fix:
mixed-meter---automatic-compound-time-signatures.ly
I took a look at this file, and I came up with the attached. What I've
done seems to work just fine, but given the
Hi again,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:03 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
I didn't manage to fix:
mixed-meter---automatic-compound-time-signatures.ly
A little more exploring
Same problem here. LilyPad editor doesn't work (but no problem from command
line or frescobaldi).
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Mac-info.plist-problem-tp33349559p33354851.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 19.02.2012 11:48, schrieb Michael Hendry:
So it would be:
#define debugging
... several pages of code ...
#ifdef debugging
... print something on the screen, and await a user response ...
#endif
... several more pages of code ...
#ifdef debugging
... do something else that's
50 matches
Mail list logo
