At Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:39:13 -0500,
David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi James,
> Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html
Thanks, this is a lot closer. (By the way, it seems that mail-archive is on the
wrong side of the Great Fi
On 08/04/12 18:39, Helge Kruse wrote:
Hello,
I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The
beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add
the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more
declarative as described in notation refere
Hello,
On 8 April 2012 17:47, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
...
> Or are many
> problems already known?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=musicxml&sort=priority&colspec=ID&x=type&y=priority&mode=grid&cells=tiles
There is also this recent - seemingly unfinished patch
http://coder
Hi,
There have been many requests from several people for Lilypond-to-MusicXML
conversion. I am not going to repeat that question.
We do have a musicxml2ly script. I have tried it with many example xml and
mxl files from here:
http://www.makemusic.com/musicxml/music/example-set
and here:
Helge Kruse-4 wrote:
>
>
> In this measure I want to break up the sextuplets in treble to a 3+3
> group. The semiquavers should be grouped 2+2.
> The quavers in the base staff should be grouped 2+2.
>
>
> I can change the beaming with beatStructure, but baseMomemt doesn't
> change anything.
Am 8. April 2012 16:39 schrieb David Nalesnik :
> Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html
>
> HTH,
> David
Hi David,
you were faster. :))
-Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing
On 8-4-2012 16:26, Hans Aikema wrote:
On 8-4-2012 12:50, Helge Kruse wrote:
Hello,
I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The
beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add
the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more
decl
Hi James,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to
> display properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example
> illustrates.
>
Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
http://www.
oops, sorry, i put #(set-accidental-style 'forget) in the wrong place. all
works npw.
2012/4/8 James
> Hello,
>
> On 8 April 2012 10:36, Wasil Sergejczyk wrote:
> > when i set \cadenzaOn, set-accidental-style has no effect. do i use it
> > correctly? is it a bug or a feature? are there any work
On 8-4-2012 12:50, Helge Kruse wrote:
Hello,
I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The
beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add
the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more
declarative as described in notation refere
Hi,
I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to display
properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example illustrates.
I don't get the barcheck errors if I replace the mm-rests with spacers, but
then I don't get the whole-rest symbols in the empty bars, and t
Hello,
On 8 April 2012 10:36, Wasil Sergejczyk wrote:
> when i set \cadenzaOn, set-accidental-style has no effect. do i use it
> correctly? is it a bug or a feature? are there any workarounds?
Remember when you set a \cadenzaOn it is like one giant *single*
measure - even if you put in \bar "|",
Greetings,
A possible solution using a markup, I guess, although it is a somewhat
messy solution requiring a bit of fiddling with the numbers indicated.
The numbers chosen depend on the length of the required staff-name in
the markup. If the X value doesn't move the markup far enough to the
lef
when i set \cadenzaOn, set-accidental-style has no effect. do i use it
correctly? is it a bug or a feature? are there any workarounds?
\version "2.15.36"
> \include "italiano.ly"
> global = {
> \cadenzaOn
> \key do \major
> \autoBeamOff
> \pointAndClickOff
> \override Staff.NoteHead #'style = #'a
yes, they seem like petrucci c-clefs, at least they fit.
thank you for your help.
2012/4/8 James
> Hello,
>
> On 7 April 2012 15:57, Wasil Sergejczyk wrote:
> > i'm trying to "re-create" this hymn and i've stumbled upon the clef(s) i
> didn't
> > find in lilypond documentation and anywhere on t
Hello,
I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The
beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add
the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more
declarative as described in notation reference "1.2.4 Beams".
In this measure I
Hello,
I need to typeset a piece but want to keep the original beaming. The
beams that Lilypond uses per default does not match. I know I can add
the [] to manually control beaming, but I hope I can do this more
declarative as described in notation reference "1.2.4 Beams".
In this measure I
17 matches
Mail list logo
