Hi! http://enneyapi.com/_redirect?odene675228
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
If you search for Rhythmic Slashes within the v2.18 snippets documentation,
you'll find another way of creating those slashes - that approach has the
advantage that the slashes will be silent in MIDI.
Best, Robert
On 2 Jul 2014, at 23:06, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com writes:
2014-07-02 12:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
However, this fix does not have regtests. I would appreciate it if you
could cook up a few short but difficult use cases for placing in the
regtests.
In order to find a
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
well, in the mentioned thread I added/changed some code, though, I'm
not the author of the solfege-engraver.
Nevertheless, I'll try to dig into it the upcoming days. Right now
I've less, down to absolutely no time for it.
Well, for figuring out
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 08:57 +0200, Robert Schmaus wrote:
If you search for Rhythmic Slashes within the v2.18 snippets documentation,
you'll find another way of creating those slashes - that approach has the
advantage that the slashes will be silent in MIDI.
Hi,
Is this the desired behavior of SpacingSpanner.packed-spacing ? (I'm
using 2.18.2)
\paper { ragged-rigth = ##t ragged-last = ##t }
\relative c' {
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'packed-spacing = ##t
c8 c c-\markup{some very very very very very very long text} c c c c c |
\repeat
Hi to all interested or involved in the openlilylib (a.k.a openlilylib
snippets) repository.
Our repository has now lived for some time, and I think it is a good
thing to have and maintain. The recent renaming was partially intended
to stress its nature as an _includable_ library (as opposed
Am 03.07.2014 10:03, schrieb Abel Cheung:
Hi,
Is this the desired behavior of SpacingSpanner.packed-spacing ? (I'm
using 2.18.2)
\paper { ragged-rigth = ##t ragged-last = ##t }
\relative c' {
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'packed-spacing = ##t
c8 c c-\markup{some very very very very
The artifact here is (forget the ragged-rigth typo), when using
packed-spacing, the whole note with markup is stretched horizontally
in an insane way to cope with the markup size, and I wonder if this is
the designed behavoir of lilypond.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Urs Liska
OK, maybe it's clearer to attach image.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Abel Cheung abelche...@gmail.com wrote:
The artifact here is (forget the ragged-rigth typo), when using
packed-spacing, the whole note with markup is stretched horizontally
in an insane way to cope with the markup size,
- Original Message -
From: Abel Cheung abelche...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Issue on packed-spacing?
OK, maybe it's clearer to attach image.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Abel Cheung abelche...@gmail.com wrote:
The
Denemo version 1.1.6 has been released. There have been improvements to
the LilyPond editing which have actually been present since version
1.1.2 but I've been getting behind with announcing releases here.
Also, asked for on this list are French 18th c keyboard ornaments - full
support for
Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com writes:
2014-07-02 12:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
However, this fix does not have regtests. I would appreciate it if you
could cook up a few short but difficult use cases for placing in the
regtests.
In order to find a
Sir or Madam,
This e-mail arrived in my in box this morning. It appears that the list has
been compromised.
Mark Stephen Mrotek
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
On 03/07/14 14:22, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Sir or Madam,
This e-mail arrived in my in box this morning. It appears that the list has
been compromised.
No I think it that this users email address
janov...@yahoo.com
has been compromised, and as he is subscribed to the Lilypond list (and
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On 03/07/14 14:22, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Sir or Madam,
This e-mail arrived in my in box this morning. It appears that the list has
been compromised.
No I think it that this users email address
janov...@yahoo.com
has been compromised, and as he is
Is it possible to add these caps to tuplet numbers?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
I like your ideas on the wiki.
- I'd like to second especially the renaming/reodering of the
definitions file. It looks better without definition(s).ily at the end.
However, it means that the content of the library doubles (one folder
and one ily).
I am not sure, if it is a good idea, but
I really should remember to always answer to the list ...
Original Message
Subject: Re: Capped tuplet number
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:03:53 +0200
From: Malte Meyn lilyp...@maltemeyn.de
To: Javier Ruiz-Alma jav...@ruiz-alma.com
Of course it is. I don’t have an exact solution
Uns Liska wrote
I think that after an initial phase of trial error we should
now do it right and create a structure we can live with for the future.
Hi Urs, This is looking like an improvement to me. Here's a thought. If
the emphasis is on include-ability, what about just having all the
Well, of course this reminded me of \textLengthOff and \textLengthOn,
which normally serve to control this behaviour.
However, with packed-spacing, \textLengthOff has no effect at all, while
\textLengthOn slightly increases the spacing between notes, or basically
it seems to me that it
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Our repository has now lived for some time, and I think it is a good thing
to have and maintain. The recent renaming was partially intended to stress
its nature as an _includable_ library (as opposed to the official LSR). But
22 matches
Mail list logo
