Am 14.01.2015 um 21:43 schrieb Gilberto Agostinho:
Urs Liska wrote
What you *can* do is add a second layer with spacer rests and override
the minimal length of the MultiMeasureRest.
Oh, that's very clever Urs!
Not my idea. I think I had it from Kieren (in a quite recent thread).
I will
Greetings David,
Is the command \markLengthOn possibly what you are looking for?
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 1/14/15, David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-01-12 22:37 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk:
The default position of
Am 14.01.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Gilberto Agostinho:
Hello LilyPonders,
I composed my first piece in proportional notation using a constant
measurement of 1 second per bar (thus, each bar must always have the same
length throughout the whole score). The notes consist of noteheads only, no
flags,
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-01-12 22:37 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk:
The default position of tempo indications is, to my eye, rather too
close to whatever is beneath them, be it a stave, a note or a slur.
I have tried experimenting with
tisimst and Hwaen - Thanks for your replies. Like may things, the answer is
simple once it is pointed out to you.
Alistair
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/arpeggioArrowUp-tp170464p170478.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello LilyPonders,
I composed my first piece in proportional notation using a constant
measurement of 1 second per bar (thus, each bar must always have the same
length throughout the whole score). The notes consist of noteheads only, no
flags, no beams, no stems, so the only reference for the
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 15:29 -0500, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
Greetings David,
Is the command \markLengthOn possibly what you are looking for?
Hwaen Ch'uqi
I don't think so, but thanks for the suggestion. The problem is not the
horizontal space occupied by the marks, but their vertical position
Hi Urs,
It works quite well (although it is not as precise as I would like). The
bars have almost the same size, so I guess I will settle for that
Urs Liska wrote
Not my idea. I think I had it from Kieren (in a quite recent thread).
Well, thanks for pointing it out to me then!
Take care,
Hi Abraham,
Am 14.01.2015 um 17:24 schrieb tisimst:
P.S. I'm with Alistair, though. Is there any reason \arpeggioArrow[Up/Down]
isn't designed to work by itself rather than requiring another explicit
\arpeggio?
I think, it is simply implemented in analogy to all the other Up/Down/Neutral
Urs Liska wrote
What you *can* do is add a second layer with spacer rests and override
the minimal length of the MultiMeasureRest.
Oh, that's very clever Urs! I will give it a try and see how it goes.
Thanks a lot for your reply, take care!
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
Consider the following snippet and the attached graphic (--png) file it
generates:
\version 2.19.15
\paper {ragged-last-bottom = ##f}
music = {
\mark \default \repeat unfold 8 s1
\break
\mark \default \repeat unfold 8 s1
\break
\mark \default \repeat
Hi John,
As a first workaround :
\version 2.19.15
#(allow-volta-hook |)
\relative c'' {
\key c \major \time 4/4
% Set details for later Text Spanner
\override TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text)
= \markup { \small \bold Slower }
% Place dynamics above staff
% Place following
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
You want to write music as if it is for a single voice
A single *player*…
A very interesting concept.
Trick question: where in lilypond is the concept of a 'player' modeled?
I've never quite found the
Hi David,
I've never quite found the right term for this.
'Player' isn't bad, although I would also suggest considering the following:
'folder', 'chair', 'stand' or 'desk’.
But (as you go on to point out) a “folder, “stand, or “desk could certainly
encompass more than one player — and
dear lilyponders:I run the following .ly file and got the following warning
error.1. how can the warning message be removed?Starting lilypond-windows.exe
2.19.15 [test_unfailing-love.ly]...Processing
Hi Andrew,
this Bash is going to be VERY(!!!) useful for me, thank you VERY(!!!)
much for posting it,
Andrea
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170186p170496.html
Sent from the User mailing list
Hi Andrew,
I'd like to add two lines to your bash, but I need assistance:
After
lilypond $file
I'd like to burts the file into multiple pdfs (one per page) and I do this
by:
pdftk $file.pdf burst
This makes one pdf file per page with the following output:
originalpdf.pdf
Can anyone tell me why \arpeggio works OK but \arpeggioArrowUp does not? When
I use it, no arpeggio line is displayed, not even one without an arrow.
Thanks
Alistair Millar
Edinburgh
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/arpeggioArrowUp-tp170464.html
Sent from
Thanks, that helps.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
One more thing...
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:55 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
\shape #'( ((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
Pierre,
I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with what Chris did, as
long is it works. In general, I think you are right because we know
that the default code in titling-init.ly works un-modified, then it
probably should not be changed, just for that sake. However, if someone
Hi David,
You want to write music as if it is for a single voice
A single *player*…
You are essentially writing polyphonic material (albeit, one voice is playing
rests at any one time.)
That’s a valid, but non-intuitive, way of looking at it… I like your
outside-the-box thinking! =)
do
Hi Harm,
2015-01-15 3:22 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
foo =
#(define-music-function (parser location mus)(ly:music?)
(music-map
(lambda (m)
(if (music-is-of-type? m 'arpeggio-event)
(make-music
'ArpeggioEvent
'tweaks
2015-01-14 22:12 GMT+01:00 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de:
Hi Abraham,
Am 14.01.2015 um 17:24 schrieb tisimst:
P.S. I'm with Alistair, though. Is there any reason \arpeggioArrow[Up/Down]
isn't designed to work by itself rather than requiring another explicit
\arpeggio?
I think, it is simply
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Do you mean that you modifed titling-init.ly ?
If yes, I don't think it is a good idea...
How about :
\version 2.18.2
\paper {
oddHeaderMarkup = \markup\on-the-fly
Johan Vromans wrote
It works for many structure-related items but unfortunately not for
repeats.
Sure it does! LP doesn't force the repeat structure into simultaneous voices
(maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't). The user just needs to be more
diligent to put \repeats in the other voices, too.
Hi Abraham,
2015-01-14 15:24 GMT+01:00 tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Pierre,
I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with what Chris did, as
long is it works. In general, I think you are right because we know that
the default code in titling-init.ly works un-modified, then it
- Original Message -
From: Alistair Millar alistair.mil...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:40 PM
Subject: arpeggioArrowUp
Can anyone tell me why \arpeggio works OK but \arpeggioArrowUp does not?
When
I use it, no arpeggio line is
I hope this is enough. Thanks
\version 2.18.2
\language english
\relative c'
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
\key g \major
g b d g4\arpeggio
g b d g4\arpeggioArrowUp
\bar |.
}
--
View this message in context:
Alistair Millar wrote
I hope this is enough. Thanks
\version 2.18.2
\language english
\relative c'
{
\clef treble
\time 4/4
\key g \major
g b d g
4\arpeggio
g b d g
4\arpeggioArrowUp
\bar |.
}
Alistair,
It does work, just not in the way you (or I)
Greetings Alistair,
The solution is actually quite simple. \arpeggioArrowUp is an override
setting of \arpeggio, so it must be entered before the chord you want
arpeggiated. Then, append \arpeggio to your chord, and all should be
fine. But remember then to revert to the arpeggio default with
Could you send us a tiny example ?
2015-01-14 12:41 GMT+01:00 Omer Katzir kome...@gmail.com:
Thank you, Pierre, however, I can't seem to move the medium to bass
staff, when I'm trying too all I get is dots in the tablature.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
Ok, I understand.
I remember doing this few years ago for grace, beams and other stettings
such as \super etc. but I quit because it was a headache when upgrading.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-14 17:16 GMT+01:00 Chris Trahan trahan.ch...@gmail.com:
Pierre,
Yes, that is what I modified. I know
Or even :
%%
\version 2.19.15
{
c1
\break
\tweak X-offset #6
\mark\markup\bold\fontsize #-2 Presto
\once\override Score.MetronomeMark.Y-offset = #13
\tempo 2 = 130
c1
}
%%
Pierre
2015-01-14 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hello folks,
Following the answer to a question I got recentlty from this list, I’ve come to:
%%
\version 2.19.15
{
c1
\break
\tempo\markup{
\column{
\vspace #2
Presto
}
} 2 = 130
c1
}
%%
How can I align the metronome indication with
Hi Jacques,
How about :
%%
\version 2.19.15
{
c1
\break
\tempo \markup\concat {
\column { \vspace #3 Presto }
\hspace #-8
}
2 = 130
c1
}
%%
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-14 17:51 GMT+01:00 Menu Jacques imj-...@bluewin.ch:
Hello folks,
Hello everyone,
Several months ago you helped me created two templates, one for 10
course lute with french tablature and the second was for 7 course lute
with french tablature.
My old iMac died and I lost both and was only able to restore the 10
course template from the group archive and I will
Hi Omer,
See:
- http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-Tuning-tc163390.html
- http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=920
HTH,
Pierre
2015-01-14 9:15 GMT+01:00 Omer Katzir kome...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone,
Several months ago you helped me created two templates, one for 10
course lute
Hi Anders,
I'm thinking about putting a dedicated snippet to the LSR.
Would you be so kind to scan and send us a short piece (like 8 to 12
measures) with all usual notation (pedals, glissandi, slurs, bends, etc.) ;
I could'nt find any nice pedal steel score on the net.
Thanks in advance,
Pierre
Am 14.01.2015 um 04:08 schrieb Paul Morris:
Urs Liska wrote
Now I've checked - it's perfect. Thank you again!
There is no alist? predicate, but it's very easy to define:
#(define (alist? lst)
(and (list? lst)
(every pair? lst)))
Glad to help and glad someone else is
Hi Chris,
Do you mean that you modifed titling-init.ly ?
If yes, I don't think it is a good idea...
How about :
\version 2.18.2
\paper {
oddHeaderMarkup = \markup\on-the-fly #not-part-first-page
\fill-line {
\null
\fromproperty #'header:title
\on-the-fly
2015-01-14 7:01 GMT+01:00 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com:
My saviour! Thanks for your help.
I now have my layout block looking like this (below), but I was wondering if
there is a way to incorporate this code into the layout block as well:
\markLengthOn
\compressFullBarRests
If I have a Scheme object like
(#Grob DynamicText )
how can I retrieve DynamicText as a string?
TIA
Urs
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
James and Phil,
I know, it’s a bit late to join the party — but better late than never! ;)
I experimented a bit with org-babel-lilypond (version 7.9.3f) in basic mode and
it looks like -dpreview is not absolutely necessary to automatically trim
images in org-mode. I didn’t have to manipulate
Johan Vromans jvromans at squirrel.nl writes:
In fact, this is separation of content and structure. It works for many
structure-related items but unfortunately not for repeats.
For example, in the following snippet the score looks right, but in the
midi the repeats are not unfolded. Do you
Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org schrieb:
Yes, I made some surprising progress with Scheme recently. I didn't even
get stuck in the ands and parens in the actual predicate I wrote
#(define (annotation? obj)
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 12:34 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
schrieb:
Yes,
Works brilliantly. Many thanks!
On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 6:54:07 PM Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-01-14 7:01 GMT+01:00 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com:
My saviour! Thanks for your help.
I now have my layout block looking like this (below), but I was
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
schrieb:
Yes, I made some surprising progress with Scheme recently. I didn't even
get stuck in the ands and parens
Am 14.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org schrieb:
Yes, I made some surprising progress with Scheme recently. I didn't
2015-01-14 10:16 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
If I have a Scheme object like
(#Grob DynamicText )
how can I retrieve DynamicText as a string?
TIA
Urs
Hi Urs,
try
#(define grob-name
(lambda (x)
(if (ly:grob? x)
(assq-ref (ly:grob-property x 'meta) 'name)
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 12:34 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
schrieb:
#(define (annotation? obj)
(and
(list? obj)
(every pair? obj)
(if (assoc-ref obj type) #t #f)
(if (assoc-ref obj location) #t #f)))
... and is this just equivalent to:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 13:56 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
schrieb:
OK, I see.
But somehow it feels wrong that
#(display annotation? some-obj)
doesn't produce #t but the content of location.
Should I ignore that feeling?
If you intended to write
#(display (annotation?
anders,
you're welcome. :)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:08 PM, and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se
wrote:
There's more than one way to skin a cat'
welcome to the wonderful world of lilypond. there are always many ways to
get the results you need. you'll just have to find the one that works best
Am 14.01.2015 um 12:42 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 12:34 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
schrieb:
#(define (annotation? obj)
(and
(list? obj)
(every pair? obj)
(if (assoc-ref obj type) #t #f)
(if (assoc-ref obj location) #t #f)))
...
54 matches
Mail list logo
