Hi Urs,
AFAIK GIT doesn't handle symlinks at all. It won't override them, but if
you clone the repo, there should be copies of the file.
Best,
Jan-Peter
P.S.: ... and now for something completely different ... I am rebuilding
the edittion-engraver from scratch to allow suggested modifications -
In my current document I', using some functions, that I have created
myself (a lot of help from the list) and I get an error
C:/Users/ame/Documents/Lilipond/PSG/firsttest.ly:5:6: error: not a
rhythmic event
e\6
\pedA a\5 \pedF cis'\4 2 e'4\4
Dear Urs,
Bravo! This is excellent work. I really appreciate all the time and effort
you put into Lilypond.
Craig
maximesmusic.com
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 9:58:13 AM tyronicus samuelsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I must immediately excuse myself for not reading the blog post first and
seeing that
why we use so many discrete projects and repositories
I would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and
perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is
the only repo I have checked out besides the lilypond git. All other repos would
be an
\repeat unfold 3 {c d e f} \bar || \break
use \bar .|:-|| instead, see NR ;)
Why shouldn't it be changed to work like the 99% would like?
Hi,
I think there are a few things to explain here:
Even if there is a break at this point and the bar line is printed twice (at the
end of the
2015-01-28 9:24 GMT+01:00 Martin Dümig mar...@duemig-neufahrn.de:
Hello,
i have the problem that my lilypond files do not produce octavated clefs
with version 2.18 and 2.19. I made a small program which generates the
expected output with 2.16, but not with 2.18 and up. Here i get the
Hi Mike,
you mean like this?
{ a1 \bar .|: a \bar :|. a }
HTH,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello,
i have the problem that my lilypond files do not produce octavated clefs with
version 2.18 and 2.19. I made a small program which generates the expected
output with 2.16, but not with 2.18 and up. Here i get the warning
Warnung: Eigenschafts-Typprüfung für »clefOctavation«
... or more like
\relative c' {
\omit Stem
\override NoteHead.style = #'slash
b'4 b b b
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 27 January 2015 at 10:53, Chris Trahan trahan.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Kieren. That's what I tried in the 1st place but the actual musical
passage is not as simple as my example, so using \skip is very unwieldy.
It's a whole verse.
\skip in lyrics is indeed arcane and unwieldy.
Hi Samuel,
thanks for your thoughts. They are not offending at all but express
valid concerns.
However, I think there are good reasons to go the way I (and others) are
going.
All these things have to be seen in the context of an idea/project you
can't know yet - specifications for a common
Am 28.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Noeck:
why we use so many discrete projects and repositories
I would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and
perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is
the only repo I have checked out besides the
I hope my other reply is a sufficient answer to this?
Yes, of course (and I agree).
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
just a (hopefully) little question:
If I create a Git repository on Linux (or Mac) and use symlinks in it
(if it matters: they point to other places within the repo), how would
they turn out for a user who clones that repostory on Windows?
Say I have the following
/
- entry
-
On 28/01/2015 22:09, Urs Liska wrote:
If I create a Git repository on Linux (or Mac) and use symlinks in it
(if it matters: they point to other places within the repo), how would
they turn out for a user who clones that repostory on Windows?
Say I have the following
/
- entry
-
AFAIK GIT doesn't handle symlinks at all. It won't override them, but if
you clone the repo, there should be copies of the file.
I just checked that (under Linux) and git handles links: I committed a symbolic
link and it appears on github as such and if I clone the repo again, it is again
a
Hi,
see : http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=908
%% example %%
\version 2.18.2
simile = \markup {
\combine
\translate #'(0.2 . 1.5)
\draw-circle #0.22 #0 ##t
\combine
\translate #'(1.8 . 0.5)
\draw-circle #0.22 #0 ##t
\rotate #90
\translate#'(0 . 2)
\beam #2 #-1 #0.58
}
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Anders,
Please send a full tiny example.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se
and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se:
In my current document I', using some functions, that I have
Thank you Victaor,
How about :
\version 2.19.15
\score {
\new Staff {
\autoBeamOff
%\override Beam.damping = #0
\offset positions #'(0 . 1) Beam
\relative c' {
c8[^sloped beam d e f]
g,[^non sloped beam a b c]
}
}
}
HTH
Pierre
2015-01-28 17:53 GMT+01:00
Thank you Anders,
myNotes = \relative c' { \pedA a2\5 \pedF cis'2\4 } seems to work.
It seems that your function cannot be applied into a chord.
Pierre
2015-01-28 17:55 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Anders,
Please
No, sorry,
I made a mistake.
In neither cases the tuplet is shown.I'll follow your suggestion, thanks!
ByeLuca
From: mr.luce...@hotmail.it
To: david.nales...@gmail.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: visibility of tuplet
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:11:33 +0100
Hi David and thank you,
I'll
Hi David and thank you,
I'll do it the way you suggest.Anyway that's strange, because the simpler
following code works fine to me.
\tuplet 3/2 {
{ \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #-0.6 e2 a, cis }
\\ { \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #0.6 d g, b }
}
In general this
I also slopped beaming compared to the default horizontal beaming.
I looked at the example and notice the following:
1) by default the 2nd group of eight notes is too horizontal
2) in the 2nd example the 2nd group of eight notes is beamed correctly
3) in the 3rd example the slope of 2nd group of
Hi Luca,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Luca Danieli mr.luce...@hotmail.it wrote:
Hi all,
I cannot show the tuplet in the next example. Does it happen to anyone
else? Does anyone know why?
\tuplet 3/2 {
{ fis2 b4 }
\\ { e,2 a4 }
} b e\harmonic2:32\fermata |
Apparently, you need to
Hi,
Wow, that looks perfect :-)
My little problem, is that it seems very complicated to me to creat/ edit...
I was wandering, that could you override melisma setting?
Because I have problem with the shape of the notes.
(I don't know the name of this *\[* g a h c *\] *)
I could solve the 5th
2015-01-28 3:30 GMT+01:00 Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com:
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:02:13 +0100
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
To: Chris Trahan trahan.ch...@gmail.com
Cc: LilyPond User Group lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Repeats - Strange behavior??
Message-ID:
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:40 PM, MarcM m...@mouries.net wrote:
I also slopped beaming compared to the default horizontal beaming.
I looked at the example and notice the following:
1) by default the 2nd group of eight notes is too horizontal
2) in the 2nd example the 2nd group of
Hi all,
I cannot show the tuplet in the next example. Does it happen to anyone else?
Does anyone know why?
\tuplet 3/2 {
{ fis2 b4 }
\\ { e,2 a4 }
} b e\harmonic2:32\fermata |
Luca
___
Hi
Bad news, I'm afraid. There is no simple way to change the shape of the note
heads used in Gregorian ligatures (the things coded as \[ ... \]). These
ligatures are built up from a wide variety of glyphs in
Vaticana_ligature_engraver.cc. The whole ligature is then treated as a single
I am doing some worksheets for my students, and would like to use single
dots on a fretboard to show them where single particular notes are
located. When I try to to place a single dot on the a string for example,
let's say open string A, when I type 1-0 within the fret-diagram string, it
bars
2015-01-29 0:55 GMT+01:00 Ryan Clarin ryancla...@gmail.com:
I am doing some worksheets for my students, and would like to use single
dots on a fretboard to show them where single particular notes are located.
When I try to to place a single dot on the a string for example, let's say
open
2015-01-27 21:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
this will fail under certain circumstances:
There was a discussion here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/review-of-a-Mutopia-file-why-TabStaff-gives-error-here-td136690.html
Though, we didn't found a real
Hi,
First of all, I have to admit that I know almost nothing about those type
of chants.
Anyway...
AFAIK, there is no predefined context or commands that will do - exactly -
such scores.
I've done something similar on the german forum :
only solution on Windows is to do some post-processing.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5917249/git-symlinks-in-windows
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Symlinks-on-Windows-tp171172p171180.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I find it wonderful that some Emacs wizard(s) took the trouble to write a
LilyPond mode for processing LilyPond files. My own ability in writing Emacs
Lisp, in particular: writing modes using Emacs Lisp, is at a very low level.
If the author(s) of the Emacs LilyPond mode could speak to me, I'd
Hi all,
how can I hook into the last stage of processing of a LilyPond score?
David Nalesnik provided me with a function through overriding
NonMusicalPaperColumn.after-line-breaking with a custom function. For
each line break this can write some information to a file.
However, I would like to
2015-01-28 17:55 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Anders,
Please send a full tiny example.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se
and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se:
Dear Sr. Judit,
I thought, there is some kind of reason like this one...
Honestly, the conventional gregorian typo is almost self-explanatory,
and has a very tough spelling. I noticed this first when trying to
use another (more lily-friendly than gregorian.ly) system.
But nevertheless, I follow
Hi Victor,
Please send a tiny example.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-28 17:23 GMT+01:00 Víctor piratabonifa...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone:
I'm trying to make beam slopes parallel to the music, or at least more
evident. So I'm using \override Beam.damping = #0 wich works mostly ok, but
beams in the
Ok.
2015-01-28 16:54 GMT+01:00 Mike Dean mike.d...@aquinas.edu:
Pierre: That is what I'm looking for with the double slash. I have created
the excerpt, but can test itThanks!
Mike Dean
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Anders,
Please send a full tiny example.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
In my current document I', using some functions, that I have created
myself (a lot of help from the list) and I get an error
Hello everyone:
I'm trying to make beam slopes parallel to the music, or at least more
evident. So I'm using \override Beam.damping = #0 wich works mostly ok,
but beams in the center of the staves are still very horizontal. I've
also tried to mess around with Beams.details list, but I can't
please repond the the list
Hi Mike,
How about:
\version 2.18.2
\include english.ly
doubleSlash = \markup\concat {
\rotate #90 \beam #2 #-1 #0.58
\hspace #-1
\rotate #90 \beam #2 #-1 #0.58
}
\markup {
\doubleSlash \doubleSlash \doubleSlash
\raise #-.5
\score {
\new Staff {
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Anders,
Please send a full tiny example.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se
and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se:
In my current document I', using some functions, that I have
I'm sorry, here it is:
\version 2.19.15
\score {
\new Staff {
\autoBeamOff
\override Beam.damping = #0
\relative c' {
c8[^sloped beam d e f]
g,[^non sloped beam a b c]
}
}
}
El 28/01/15 a las 10:37, Pierre Perol-Schneider escibió:
Hi Victor,
Please send a
2015-01-27 12:56 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk:
I use Staff.printKeyCancellation = ##f in my score.
At one point the key changes from C major (concert) to C minor. As the
piece is for a standard saxophone quartet, this means that 2 of the
instruments change from D major
Thank you for your quick response Pierre. Your solution fixes ascending
music, but descending music has now horizontal beams too:
\version 2.19.15
\score {
\new Staff {
\autoBeamOff
%\override Beam.damping = #0
\offset positions #'(0 . 1) Beam
\relative c' {
c8[^sloped
2015-01-28 18:13 GMT+01:00 Víctor piratabonifa...@gmail.com:
Thank you for your quick response Pierre. Your solution fixes ascending
music, but descending music has now horizontal beams too:
\version 2.19.15
\score {
\new Staff {
\autoBeamOff
%\override Beam.damping = #0
Thank you very much, this fixed my issue.
El 28/01/15 a las 13:47, Thomas Morley escibió:
\score {
\new Staff {
\autoBeamOff
\override Beam.damping = #0
\override Stem.no-stem-extend = ##t
\relative c' {
c8[^sloped beam d e f]
g,[^non sloped beam a b c]
49 matches
Mail list logo