Re: Symlinks on Windows

2015-01-28 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Hi Urs, AFAIK GIT doesn't handle symlinks at all. It won't override them, but if you clone the repo, there should be copies of the file. Best, Jan-Peter P.S.: ... and now for something completely different ... I am rebuilding the edittion-engraver from scratch to allow suggested modifications -

Stack Trace on Error?

2015-01-28 Thread and...@andis59.se
In my current document I', using some functions, that I have created myself (a lot of help from the list) and I get an error C:/Users/ame/Documents/Lilipond/PSG/firsttest.ly:5:6: error: not a rhythmic event e\6 \pedA a\5 \pedF cis'\4 2 e'4\4

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-28 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Dear Urs, Bravo! This is excellent work. I really appreciate all the time and effort you put into Lilypond. Craig maximesmusic.com On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 9:58:13 AM tyronicus samuelsp...@gmail.com wrote: I must immediately excuse myself for not reading the blog post first and seeing that

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-28 Thread Noeck
why we use so many discrete projects and repositories I would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is the only repo I have checked out besides the lilypond git. All other repos would be an

Re: Repeats - Strange behavior??

2015-01-28 Thread Noeck
\repeat unfold 3 {c d e f} \bar || \break use \bar .|:-|| instead, see NR ;) Why shouldn't it be changed to work like the 99% would like? Hi, I think there are a few things to explain here: Even if there is a break at this point and the bar line is printed twice (at the end of the

Re: Octavation of clef works with lilypond v 2.16.1, but not with 2.18

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-01-28 9:24 GMT+01:00 Martin Dümig mar...@duemig-neufahrn.de: Hello, i have the problem that my lilypond files do not produce octavated clefs with version 2.18 and 2.19. I made a small program which generates the expected output with 2.16, but not with 2.18 and up. Here i get the

Re: isolated repeats or other signs

2015-01-28 Thread Noeck
Hi Mike, you mean like this? { a1 \bar .|: a \bar :|. a } HTH, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Octavation of clef works with lilypond v 2.16.1, but not with 2.18

2015-01-28 Thread Martin Dümig
Hello, i have the problem that my lilypond files do not produce octavated clefs with version 2.18 and 2.19. I made a small program which generates the expected output with 2.16, but not with 2.18 and up. Here i get the warning Warnung: Eigenschafts-Typprüfung für »clefOctavation«

Re: isolated repeats or other signs

2015-01-28 Thread Noeck
... or more like \relative c' { \omit Stem \override NoteHead.style = #'slash b'4 b b b } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to get lyrics to skip measures?

2015-01-28 Thread Vaughan McAlley
On 27 January 2015 at 10:53, Chris Trahan trahan.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Kieren. That's what I tried in the 1st place but the actual musical passage is not as simple as my example, so using \skip is very unwieldy. It's a whole verse. \skip in lyrics is indeed arcane and unwieldy.

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-28 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Samuel, thanks for your thoughts. They are not offending at all but express valid concerns. However, I think there are good reasons to go the way I (and others) are going. All these things have to be seen in the context of an idea/project you can't know yet - specifications for a common

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-28 Thread Urs Liska
Am 28.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Noeck: why we use so many discrete projects and repositories I would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is the only repo I have checked out besides the

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-28 Thread Noeck
I hope my other reply is a sufficient answer to this? Yes, of course (and I agree). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Symlinks on Windows

2015-01-28 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, just a (hopefully) little question: If I create a Git repository on Linux (or Mac) and use symlinks in it (if it matters: they point to other places within the repo), how would they turn out for a user who clones that repostory on Windows? Say I have the following / - entry -

Re: Symlinks on Windows

2015-01-28 Thread Nick Payne
On 28/01/2015 22:09, Urs Liska wrote: If I create a Git repository on Linux (or Mac) and use symlinks in it (if it matters: they point to other places within the repo), how would they turn out for a user who clones that repostory on Windows? Say I have the following / - entry -

Re: Symlinks on Windows

2015-01-28 Thread Noeck
AFAIK GIT doesn't handle symlinks at all. It won't override them, but if you clone the repo, there should be copies of the file. I just checked that (under Linux) and git handles links: I committed a symbolic link and it appears on github as such and if I clone the repo again, it is again a

Re: isolated repeats or other signs

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi, see : http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=908 %% example %% \version 2.18.2 simile = \markup { \combine \translate #'(0.2 . 1.5) \draw-circle #0.22 #0 ##t \combine \translate #'(1.8 . 0.5) \draw-circle #0.22 #0 ##t \rotate #90 \translate#'(0 . 2) \beam #2 #-1 #0.58 }

Re: Stack Trace on Error? Now with the right files!

2015-01-28 Thread and...@andis59.se
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Anders, Please send a full tiny example. Cheers, Pierre 2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se: In my current document I', using some functions, that I have

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Thank you Victaor, How about : \version 2.19.15 \score { \new Staff { \autoBeamOff %\override Beam.damping = #0 \offset positions #'(0 . 1) Beam \relative c' { c8[^sloped beam d e f] g,[^non sloped beam a b c] } } } HTH Pierre 2015-01-28 17:53 GMT+01:00

Re: Stack Trace on Error? Now with the right files!

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Thank you Anders, myNotes = \relative c' { \pedA a2\5 \pedF cis'2\4 } seems to work. It seems that your function cannot be applied into a chord. Pierre 2015-01-28 17:55 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se: On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Anders, Please

RE: visibility of tuplet

2015-01-28 Thread Luca Danieli
No, sorry, I made a mistake. In neither cases the tuplet is shown.I'll follow your suggestion, thanks! ByeLuca From: mr.luce...@hotmail.it To: david.nales...@gmail.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: visibility of tuplet Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:11:33 +0100 Hi David and thank you, I'll

RE: visibility of tuplet

2015-01-28 Thread Luca Danieli
Hi David and thank you, I'll do it the way you suggest.Anyway that's strange, because the simpler following code works fine to me. \tuplet 3/2 { { \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #-0.6 e2 a, cis } \\ { \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #0.6 d g, b } } In general this

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread MarcM
I also slopped beaming compared to the default horizontal beaming. I looked at the example and notice the following: 1) by default the 2nd group of eight notes is too horizontal 2) in the 2nd example the 2nd group of eight notes is beamed correctly 3) in the 3rd example the slope of 2nd group of

Re: visibility of tuplet

2015-01-28 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Luca, On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Luca Danieli mr.luce...@hotmail.it wrote: Hi all, I cannot show the tuplet in the next example. Does it happen to anyone else? Does anyone know why? \tuplet 3/2 { { fis2 b4 } \\ { e,2 a4 } } b e\harmonic2:32\fermata | Apparently, you need to

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

2015-01-28 Thread Rita Composer
Hi, Wow, that looks perfect :-) My little problem, is that it seems very complicated to me to creat/ edit... I was wandering, that could you override melisma setting? Because I have problem with the shape of the notes. (I don't know the name of this *\[* g a h c *\] *) I could solve the 5th

Re: Repeats - Strange behavior??

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-01-28 3:30 GMT+01:00 Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com: Message: 6 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:02:13 +0100 From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com To: Chris Trahan trahan.ch...@gmail.com Cc: LilyPond User Group lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Repeats - Strange behavior?? Message-ID:

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Marc, On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:40 PM, MarcM m...@mouries.net wrote: I also slopped beaming compared to the default horizontal beaming. I looked at the example and notice the following: 1) by default the 2nd group of eight notes is too horizontal 2) in the 2nd example the 2nd group of

visibility of tuplet

2015-01-28 Thread Luca Danieli
Hi all, I cannot show the tuplet in the next example. Does it happen to anyone else? Does anyone know why? \tuplet 3/2 { { fis2 b4 } \\ { e,2 a4 } } b e\harmonic2:32\fermata | Luca ___

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

2015-01-28 Thread Trevor Daniels
Hi Bad news, I'm afraid. There is no simple way to change the shape of the note heads used in Gregorian ligatures (the things coded as \[ ... \]). These ligatures are built up from a wide variety of glyphs in Vaticana_ligature_engraver.cc. The whole ligature is then treated as a single

Fret-diagram custom mark-ups - only placing 1 dot on fretboard

2015-01-28 Thread Ryan Clarin
I am doing some worksheets for my students, and would like to use single dots on a fretboard to show them where single particular notes are located. When I try to to place a single dot on the a string for example, let's say open string A, when I type 1-0 within the fret-diagram string, it bars

Re: Fret-diagram custom mark-ups - only placing 1 dot on fretboard

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-01-29 0:55 GMT+01:00 Ryan Clarin ryancla...@gmail.com: I am doing some worksheets for my students, and would like to use single dots on a fretboard to show them where single particular notes are located. When I try to to place a single dot on the a string for example, let's say open

Re: Ritardando and accelerando

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
2015-01-27 21:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com: this will fail under certain circumstances: There was a discussion here: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/review-of-a-Mutopia-file-why-TabStaff-gives-error-here-td136690.html Though, we didn't found a real

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi, First of all, I have to admit that I know almost nothing about those type of chants. Anyway... AFAIK, there is no predefined context or commands that will do - exactly - such scores. I've done something similar on the german forum :

Re: Symlinks on Windows

2015-01-28 Thread MarcM
only solution on Windows is to do some post-processing. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5917249/git-symlinks-in-windows -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Symlinks-on-Windows-tp171172p171180.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Emacs mode for files containing lyrics

2015-01-28 Thread Craig Parker-Feldmann
I find it wonderful that some Emacs wizard(s) took the trouble to write a LilyPond mode for processing LilyPond files. My own ability in writing Emacs Lisp, in particular: writing modes using Emacs Lisp, is at a very low level. If the author(s) of the Emacs LilyPond mode could speak to me, I'd

Order of operations

2015-01-28 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, how can I hook into the last stage of processing of a LilyPond score? David Nalesnik provided me with a function through overriding NonMusicalPaperColumn.after-line-breaking with a custom function. For each line break this can write some information to a file. However, I would like to

Re: Stack Trace on Error? Now with the right files!

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-01-28 17:55 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se: On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Anders, Please send a full tiny example. Cheers, Pierre 2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se:

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

2015-01-28 Thread Ali Cuota
Dear Sr. Judit, I thought, there is some kind of reason like this one... Honestly, the conventional gregorian typo is almost self-explanatory, and has a very tough spelling. I noticed this first when trying to use another (more lily-friendly than gregorian.ly) system. But nevertheless, I follow

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Victor, Please send a tiny example. Cheers, Pierre 2015-01-28 17:23 GMT+01:00 Víctor piratabonifa...@gmail.com: Hello everyone: I'm trying to make beam slopes parallel to the music, or at least more evident. So I'm using \override Beam.damping = #0 wich works mostly ok, but beams in the

Re: isolated repeats or other signs

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Ok. 2015-01-28 16:54 GMT+01:00 Mike Dean mike.d...@aquinas.edu: Pierre: That is what I'm looking for with the double slash. I have created the excerpt, but can test itThanks! Mike Dean On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Stack Trace on Error?

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Anders, Please send a full tiny example. Cheers, Pierre 2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se: In my current document I', using some functions, that I have created myself (a lot of help from the list) and I get an error

Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Víctor
Hello everyone: I'm trying to make beam slopes parallel to the music, or at least more evident. So I'm using \override Beam.damping = #0 wich works mostly ok, but beams in the center of the staves are still very horizontal. I've also tried to mess around with Beams.details list, but I can't

Re: isolated repeats or other signs

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
please repond the the list Hi Mike, How about: \version 2.18.2 \include english.ly doubleSlash = \markup\concat { \rotate #90 \beam #2 #-1 #0.58 \hspace #-1 \rotate #90 \beam #2 #-1 #0.58 } \markup { \doubleSlash \doubleSlash \doubleSlash \raise #-.5 \score { \new Staff {

Re: Stack Trace on Error?

2015-01-28 Thread and...@andis59.se
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Anders, Please send a full tiny example. Cheers, Pierre 2015-01-28 15:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se: In my current document I', using some functions, that I have

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Víctor
I'm sorry, here it is: \version 2.19.15 \score { \new Staff { \autoBeamOff \override Beam.damping = #0 \relative c' { c8[^sloped beam d e f] g,[^non sloped beam a b c] } } } El 28/01/15 a las 10:37, Pierre Perol-Schneider escibió: Hi Victor, Please send a

Re: Key signature and key cancellation need to be aligned

2015-01-28 Thread David Sumbler
2015-01-27 12:56 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk: I use Staff.printKeyCancellation = ##f in my score. At one point the key changes from C major (concert) to C minor. As the piece is for a standard saxophone quartet, this means that 2 of the instruments change from D major

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Víctor
Thank you for your quick response Pierre. Your solution fixes ascending music, but descending music has now horizontal beams too: \version 2.19.15 \score { \new Staff { \autoBeamOff %\override Beam.damping = #0 \offset positions #'(0 . 1) Beam \relative c' { c8[^sloped

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-01-28 18:13 GMT+01:00 Víctor piratabonifa...@gmail.com: Thank you for your quick response Pierre. Your solution fixes ascending music, but descending music has now horizontal beams too: \version 2.19.15 \score { \new Staff { \autoBeamOff %\override Beam.damping = #0

Re: Beam slope tweaking

2015-01-28 Thread Víctor
Thank you very much, this fixed my issue. El 28/01/15 a las 13:47, Thomas Morley escibió: \score { \new Staff { \autoBeamOff \override Beam.damping = #0 \override Stem.no-stem-extend = ##t \relative c' { c8[^sloped beam d e f] g,[^non sloped beam a b c]