Rep: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Philippe Massart
It turns out that custom annotation types were not properly handled. \annotate looks up the LaTeX value in an alist dictionary, and for custom annotations this simply returned #f. Pushed a fix, should work now. Thanks for the report. Best Urs Thanks :-) I still have an issue on

Re: Rep: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Urs Liska
Am 30.01.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Philippe Massart: It turns out that custom annotation types were not properly handled. \annotate looks up the LaTeX value in an alist dictionary, and for custom annotations this simply returned #f. Pushed a fix, should work now. Thanks for the report. Best

Re: Where are Lilypond Scheme functions documented?

2015-01-30 Thread David Nalesnik
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 30.01.2015 um 22:06 schrieb David Nalesnik: [...] what we find at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/scheme-functions: *Function:* *ly:music-property** mus sym val* Return the value for

Re: Rep: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Philippe Massart
I still have an issue on the example file, on the custom annotation, with this message: ./annotate.annotations.inp:15: Undefined control sequence. argument See \textbackslash what is \possible [opts]{args} l.15 {custom-annotation}

Re: Where are Lilypond Scheme functions documented?

2015-01-30 Thread David Nalesnik
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk wrote: Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:16:12 +0100 From: and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Where are Lilypond Scheme functions documented? Message-ID:

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Craig, Am 30.01.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Urs, Here is a zip of the complete project. Thank you, this was indeed instructive (and a nice score BTW). There is an issue with your set-up which I had immediately noticed and wanted to tell you about, even before I realized you

Re: Where are Lilypond Scheme functions documented?

2015-01-30 Thread Urs Liska
Am 30.01.2015 um 22:06 schrieb David Nalesnik: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk mailto:peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk wrote: Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:16:12 +0100 From: and...@andis59.se mailto:and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se

Re: Key signature and key cancellation need to be aligned

2015-01-30 Thread David Sumbler
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com To: David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Key signature and key cancellation need to be aligned Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:21:15 +0100 2015-01-28 19:00 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler da...@aeolia.co.uk:

Where are Lilypond Scheme functions documented?

2015-01-30 Thread Peter Gentry
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:16:12 +0100 From: and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Where are Lilypond Scheme functions documented? Message-ID: 54caa31c.1060...@andis59.se Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Have a look at

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

2015-01-30 Thread Noeck
Hi Pierre, I am writing here as an interested spectator. I find this very interesting. The optimal solution would be to have the stem lengths being calculated from the note distances and in a uniform syntax with other transcriptions of gregorian music – know that’s not your scope, I am just

Re: Stack Trace on Error? Now with the right files!

2015-01-30 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-01-29 22:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se: On 2015-01-28 21:45, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Thank you Anders, myNotes = \relative c' { \pedA a2\5 \pedF cis'2\4 } seems to work. It seems that your function cannot be applied into a chord. Well, I don't know what to

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Thanks Urs, And you put the \include annotate code in the main-init.ily file? Craig On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 8:05:57 AM Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Hi Craig, Am 30.01.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Urs, Here is a zip of the complete project. Thank you, this was

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Urs Liska
Am 31. Januar 2015 03:05:24 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com: Thanks Urs, And you put the \include annotate code in the main-init.ily file? Yes, and any similar code like the include of global-defs.ily etc. too. Urs Craig On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 8:05:57 AM Urs Liska

Re: arpeggio on single note

2015-01-30 Thread Noeck
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#Selected-Snippets-33 Yes, this shows the cross-staff arpeggio. But the examples there have always two notes in each staff. It would be interesting how to notate an arpeggio when only one note is e.g. in the bass

Re: arpeggio on single note

2015-01-30 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 30.01.2015 um 03:30 schrieb Br. Samuel Springuel: a cross staff arpeggio Ha! I think I know where to find this one: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#Selected-Snippets-33 Yes, this shows the cross-staff arpeggio. But the examples there have

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Urs, I put \include scholarly/annotate.ily in each of my 24 files -- one for each instrument. In the score I put: \include scholarly/annotate.ily \setAnnotationExportTargets #'(plaintext latex) I added 1 criticalremark and 1 musical issue to test it out. The generated parts (both the log

Re: Stack Trace on Error? Now with the right files!

2015-01-30 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
[OFF TOPIC] I'm stuck with converting automagically score/ties into tab/glissandi. Thanks anyway for the reminder! Cheers, Pierre 2015-01-29 22:06 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se: BTW, have you gotten anywhere with the LSR snippet? (just curious...)

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Urs Liska
Am 30.01.2015 um 09:35 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi Urs, I put \include scholarly/annotate.ily in each of my 24 files -- one for each instrument. In the score I put: \include scholarly/annotate.ily \setAnnotationExportTargets #'(plaintext latex) I added 1 criticalremark and 1 musical issue

Re: arpeggio on single note

2015-01-30 Thread MING TSANG
Thank you Mark , Robin , Noeck , Dominic, Helge Kruse, Br. Samuel Springuel and David Nalesnik: after use the following the warning message is gone.\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t Immanuel,Ming On Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:03 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com

Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

2015-01-30 Thread Urs Liska
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:16 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 30.01.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Philippe Massart: Probably not. I assume that hash hasn't been properly filtered. Could you please post the generated .inp and maybe also the LilyPond file? Urs These are based on the sample file included : Ah, OK.

Re: Hungarian Gregorian

2015-01-30 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Dear Sister Judit, Dear All, I slightly changed the snippet for a much easier typesetting; See: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=973 Now you can include a modernGregorian.ily file and simply code like: ... d d d \melisma { f g \lst a } \orn #1 g g \melisma { g a \lst c' } ... Some issues