Re: How do i set the minimum system space?

2016-08-07 0:46 GMT+02:00 Philip Bergwerf : > Hello everyone, > > I am puzzling with the following code: [...] > How can > i set the minimum system spacing? I hope you guys know how to do it? Hi Philip, your code does not compile GNU LilyPond 2.18.2 Processing

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/6/2016 11:31 AM, Noeck wrote: > Am 06.08.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Graham Percival: >> Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part >> of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. >> >> I think it would be a nicer approach to having something >>

How do i set the minimum system space?

Hello everyone, I am puzzling with the following code: %begin code \version "2.18.2" \header { title = "Impromptu in As-dur" subtitle = "D 835-2 (Opus 142 No. 2)" composer = "Franz Shubert" copyright = \markup {© "Philip Bergwerf" \italic "2016 ~" \normal-text \bold \box {"Piano_TAB"}}

RE: LilyPond logo?

Pierre, #6 Thank you. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Pierre Perol-Schneider Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 1:36 PM To: Malte Meyn Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re:

Re: LilyPond logo?

\line { \with-color #red \bold "14. " "Music engraving by" \combine \concat { \hspace #0.5 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" } \raise #0.4 \override #'(thickness . 2.4) \override #'(style . outline) \whiteout \logoMalteSeven #0.5 "LilyPond 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org" } Ok, I should go to bed, probably

Re: LilyPond logo?

Or even: \version "2.19.46" lilypond = \markup\concat { "Lily" \hspace #-.6 \raise #.5 \rotate #170 \fontsize #-4 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" \hspace #-.5 "ond" } \markup { \with-color #red \bold "13. " "Music engraving by" \lilypond " 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Malte Meyn: - #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try to add a pad. Here is an attempt to use

Re: LilyPond logo?

Tests update attached. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 19:20 GMT+02:00 Blöchl Bernhard : > I recommend a simple solution: > Do not use it! > > Am 06.08.2016 18:25, schrieb Graham Percival: > >> Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part >> of

Re: LilyPond logo?

I recommend a simple solution: Do not use it! Am 06.08.2016 18:25, schrieb Graham Percival: Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. ___ lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi All, @ Johan: I fully agree. Done. @ Malte: OK copied. @ Simon: Yes I had the same feeling but I'm stuck there, still trying to find something much better. @ Graham: Ok, good idea but I not fully agree with the 'botany' reason (any direct link between an apple and a computer ?) Tests

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Graham Percival: > Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part > of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. > > I think it would be a nicer approach to having something > recognizably "sheet music" in the logo. +1

Re: LilyPond logo?

Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. I think it would be a nicer approach to having something recognizably "sheet music" in the logo. For example, simply "Lp", with the "p" being in the normal dynamic

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : Logo test enclosed. Basically, the only one I'd fancy is No. 6, except the flower now looks like an explosion, or the splash of a stone thrown in water :-) Best,

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre My opinions: - #5 is much better than both #3 and #2 (and #1) because it’s more realistic (no

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:11:26 +0200 Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Plus pdf Bij far: Number 9, provided the lily lines are a bit thinner, and the leaves individually drawn. Printers today have resolutions of 600dpi and higher so no need for such a thick lines.

Re: LilyPond logo?

Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Logo test enclosed. > > Cheers, > Pierre > > 2016-08-06 15:32 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > >> >> >> On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: >> >> >Am

Re: LilyPond logo?

Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 15:32 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > > > On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: > > >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > > > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: > > >> - Original

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> - Original Message - > >> From: Andrew Bernard > >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/5/16 7:50 AM, "Mark Knoop" wrote: >At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >>- Original Message - >>From: Andrew Bernard >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >>> lilypond is >>> ŒLilypond¹ or ŒLilyPond¹ or ŒLily Pond¹ or

Re: LilyPond logo?

>> >> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566750/ecology_flower_flowers_green_lily_nature_water-lily_icon#size=512 > > This icon is for sale at $1 ... … with a license saying: The Licensed Material may not be: * ... * Incorporated into a logo or other trademark

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? > > > > “softer”? shorter? narrower? Sorry, I don’t know what you mean ... > > Something similar to the waterlily logo at > > >

Re: "merge" \layout definitions

Hi Harm, Am 06.08.2016 um 07:05 schrieb Urs Liska: >> Hi Urs, >> > >> > maybe the code below. Though, it's more a proof of concept... > Hi Harm, > > thank you for the "proof-of-concept". > I think I roughly understand what you do and try figuring out how to > integrate it in my real-world use