Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread Wols Lists
On 01/01/17 23:34, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Am 2017-01-01 um 21:07 schrieb Wols Lists : > >> On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, > Oolilypond did not make any use of it. >> >>> Oh,

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2017-01-01 um 21:07 schrieb Wols Lists : > On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: >>> I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, Oolilypond did not make any use of it. > >> Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again.

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread Wols Lists
On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: >> I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, >> >Oolilypond did not make any use of it. > Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to > maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread Urs Liska
Am 1. Januar 2017 20:49:50 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : >Urs Liska writes: > >> Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck >: >>>Hi, >>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. Quite a pity ... >>> >>>If there is interest in

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck : >>Hi, >> >>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. >>> Quite a pity ... >> >>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author >>would agree to do so. > > I think

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread Urs Liska
Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck : >Hi, > >> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. >> Quite a pity ... > >If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author >would agree to do so. I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. >

Re: OOoLilyPond

2017-01-01 Thread Noeck
Hi, > IIRC it is officially unmaintained. > Quite a pity ... If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author would agree to do so. I don't remember if there is a license with it, but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week. IIUC, the extension is just a

Re: Hello everyone / Instrument-Name-Abbreviation on front of every system

2017-01-01 Thread UCas
Hi, sorry, I answered to both mails, but directly instead of addressing the list. Case closed, it worked for me. Thank you. :-) UCas Am 01.01.2017 um 00:45 schrieb H. S. Teoh: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 01:12:21AM +0100, UCas wrote: > [...] >> For scores with more than 3 or 4 instruments I

Re: LyricExtender and alternate volta ending

2017-01-01 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Thanks guys, I knew there was a way to fool the system. ;) I think I'll go for David's approach. That way I don't need to mess with the music. I must also check if I can use the \nbsp to get rid of some pesky warnings with other extenders, which I have ended with "" to stop them extending over