Alexander Kobel writes:
> +1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
> ... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
> choir literature (especially combined with the upcoming automatic
> extenders). Unfortunately, assignment of lyrics to *container*
>
Hi,
I want to support lilypond with some regression testing - unfortunately I'm not
able to enroll...
"Server Error in '/' Application.
The Microsoft Jet database engine cannot open the file
'D:\inetpub\vhosts\philholmes.me.uk\private\RegTests\RegTestRater.mdb'. It is
already opened exclusive
Hi,
not sure, if I'm right on this list for this issue - if not, pls point me where
to go :)
on
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/typesetting-mensural-music
the example for "Mensuraler F-Schlüssel im Petrucci-Stil" is not f-key but
c-key...
Joei
__
On 2017-01-19 18:19, Rob Torop wrote:
I'dlike to create a measure that has 4 forward slashes in it
(only). This does almost what I want except of course it has the rest
at the start:
\repeat percent 4 { r4 }
Is there a way to get just 4 slashes?
Hi Rob,
Here's how I do it:
{
\ov
I'dlike to create a measure that has 4 forward slashes in it (only).
This does almost what I want except of course it has the rest at the start:
\repeat percent 4 { r4 }
Is there a way to get just 4 slashes?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lily
Hi David,
On 2017-01-19 12:59, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David, you wrote Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:18 AM
it would appear that my excursion into a regular workplace ended up
somewhat shortlived.
Really sorry to hear that, but it's great to have you back!
Ditto. I wish that you would have
David Kastrup wrote
> Hi fellow ponders,
>
> it would appear that my excursion into a regular workplace ended up
> somewhat shortlived.
>
> So for the short time range, I am again dependent on support by other
> LilyPond lovers.
>
> Sorry for turning on dime again here.
>
> But at any rate, I
Am 19.01.2017 um 22:02 schrieb Amir Teymuri:
> how can i change the Staff of only one note of a chord?
For cross staff stems see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards#cross_002dstaff-stems
___
lilypond-user
Peter Gentry wrote
> Brian Barker has kindly put me straight and supplied the answer
>
>
>
> \paper { system-system-spacing.basic-distance = #25 }
>
>
>
> He also corrected my assumption as to the definition of a system.
>
>
>
> Thanks Brian
>
>
> _
Amir,
Some instructions for cross staff stems are at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-key
boards#cross_002dstaff-stems
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Amir Teymuri
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:02:00PM +0100, Amir Teymuri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how can i change the Staff of only one note of a chord? For example if
> i have the following line:
>
> r2 8[ 8] r8 8
>
> and want to change the staff of only the very last bes'' to be on the
> base clef (with the rest of
Hello,
how can i change the Staff of only one note of a chord? For example if
i have the following line:
r2 8[ 8] r8 8
and want to change the staff of only the very last bes'' to be on the
base clef (with the rest of the chord being remained at treble clef)?
Thanks,
Amir
__
Brian Barker has kindly put me straight and supplied the answer
\paper { system-system-spacing.basic-distance = #25 }
He also corrected my assumption as to the definition of a system.
Thanks Brian
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
Hi David,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:10 AM, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote:
>> arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context. Rewriting its
>> definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here:
>>
>> arpeggioArrowUp = {
>> \revert PianoStaff.Arp
Hi David,
David Sumbler wrote
> Another approach would, of course, be to tie each note of the sextuplet
> directly to the note in the following chord. I have not tried this
> because I don't know how it can be done.
search the notation reference for:
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
Cheers,
Klaus
Sorry - I pressed "Send" too soon on my previous message, which
contains some nonsense. Here is a more sensible version.
The piece I am setting has 4 bars of somewhat unorthodox notation. My
best attempt at reproducing this is:
%%
\version "2.19.48"
lv = \laissezVibrer
lvUp = \
The piece I am setting has 4 bars of somewhat unorthodox notation. My
best attempt at reproducing this is:
%%
\version "2.19.48"
lv = \laissezVibrer
lvUp = \once \override LaissezVibrerTie.direction = #UP
rt = \repeatTie
rtDown = \once \override RepeatTie.direction = #DOWN
\new
Peter Gentry wrote
> How does one control the vertical space between staff groups. I can see
> how
> to modify the vertical spacing of staves within a Staff Group but not
> between Staff Groups on a page.
>
>
>
> The answer may lie in page layout but that is as far as I can get. A
> search
> i
Peter Gentry wrote
> How does one control the vertical space between staff groups. I can see
> how
> to modify the vertical spacing of staves within a Staff Group but not
> between Staff Groups on a page.
>
>
>
> The answer may lie in page layout but that is as far as I can get. A
> search
> i
On 18.01.2017 23:51, Thomas Morley wrote:
Non-default scales are always user defined. How could we predict them?
P.e. some FLAT/SHARP-combinations will collide others not...
Which is why any automatic approach will have to involve horizontal
skylines, as David N. already said.
Best, Simon
__
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David, you wrote Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:18 AM
>
>> it would appear that my excursion into a regular workplace ended up
>> somewhat shortlived.
>
> Really sorry to hear that, but it's great to have you back!
>
>> So for the short time range, I am again dependent
How does one control the vertical space between staff groups. I can see how
to modify the vertical spacing of staves within a Staff Group but not
between Staff Groups on a page.
The answer may lie in page layout but that is as far as I can get. A search
in the archives has not revealed a solut
Trevor wrote:
> I'll definitely turn on my financial contribution again.
>
what's the better way to give a financial contribution?
g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
David, you wrote Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:18 AM
> it would appear that my excursion into a regular workplace ended up
somewhat shortlived.
Really sorry to hear that, but it's great to have you back!
> So for the short time range, I am again dependent
> on support by other LilyPond lovers.
Hi fellow ponders,
it would appear that my excursion into a regular workplace ended up
somewhat shortlived. Long story short, I was not able to convincingly
make a weekly commute, part home-office, and very Windows-centric
workflows (and using rather unflexible version control) and a focus on
sh
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 19.01.2017 um 09:59 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 18.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Morley:
customClefStencilOne =
#(ly:make-stencil `(path 0.2 ',(func 1))
>>> ... I wouldn't have ever thought of that ', combination.
>>>
>>> I had yet a
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote:
> arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context. Rewriting its
> definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here:
>
> arpeggioArrowUp = {
> \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.stencil
> \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.X-extent
> \override Pia
Am 19.01.2017 um 09:59 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 18.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>> customClefStencilOne =
>>> #(ly:make-stencil `(path 0.2 ',(func 1))
>> ... I wouldn't have ever thought of that ', combination.
>>
>> I had yet another complication because
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 18.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>
>> customClefStencilOne =
>> #(ly:make-stencil `(path 0.2 ',(func 1))
>
> ... I wouldn't have ever thought of that ', combination.
>
> I had yet another complication because in my actual case "func" would
> return an arbitrary
Hi Harm,
thank you very much!
Am 18.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> 2017-01-18 11:15 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>>
>> Am 18.01.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Urs Liska:
>>> See attached file which is derived from
>>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=623.
>>>
>> Sorry, please *ignore* the attach
30 matches
Mail list logo