RE: Name of the command

David, Thanks for the direction. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Kastrup Sent: Monday, January 01, 2018 3:20 PM To: Caagr98 Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Name of the

RE: Name of the command

Urs, Thank you. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Urs Liska Sent: Monday, January 01, 2018 3:20 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Name of the command Am 02.01.2018 um 00:12 schrieb Caagr98: >

Re: Name of the command

Am 02.01.2018 um 00:12 schrieb Caagr98: Are you thinking of `\set tieWaitForChord = ##t \grace {blah} blah \unset tieWaitForChord`? No, of \set tieWaitForNote Urs On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello, A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to

Re: Name of the command

Dammit. I did look it up in the source code, but then I wrote it wrong here. On 01/02/18 00:19, David Kastrup wrote: > Caagr98 writes: > >>> On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello,   A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be

Re: Name of the command

Caagr98 writes: >> On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>>   >>> >>> A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the >>> following chord, e.g., >>> >>> \grace {c8~ e~ g~} 2. >>> >>>   >>> >>> I thought it was >>> >>> \tie

Re: Name of the command

Are you thinking of `\set tieWaitForChord = ##t \grace {blah} blah \unset tieWaitForChord`? On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Hello, > >   > > A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the following > chord, e.g., > > \grace {c8~ e~ g~} 2. > >   > > I

Name of the command

Hello, A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the following chord, e.g., \grace {c8~ e~ g~} 2. I thought it was \tie WaitforChord, yet that is not correct. Tried searching the manual. Any direction appreciated. Mark

Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?

On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 5:08 PM Gianmaria Lari wrote: > Ciao Michael, > > Thank you for your help, now it works!! > Great. I added some more explanatory text to help others not stumble over it. > Some suggestion about your test page: > - The text box where you can write

Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:08 PM wrote: > David Kastrup: > > Michael Ellis writes: > ... > > > The MuseScore output is correct and matches the tempo and meter items > > > embedded in the original midi file (attached). I've also verified > with 2

Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:11 PM Michael Ellis wrote: > David Kastrup wrote: > >- I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar >checks that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout. > > > I'll try upgrading to 2.21 and see if that makes any

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

That works great, thanks! I need to manually override Y-offset, but that's fine. I also made this function to add holes in the bracket (requires setting the bracket's layer to -1): whiteout = #(define-event-function (x y) (number-pair? number-pair?) #{ \tweak layer #0 \tweak

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

"Caagr98" wrote 01/01/2018 18:17:37 \repeat volta 2 {R1} \alternative { {a4 a a a a a a a} {R1} } In this example, the volta is moved very far up because of that one note. This is very ugly IMO. Is there any way to insert a hole in the line and have the note stick

Holes in spanners for tall notes

\repeat volta 2 {R1} \alternative { {a4 a a a a a a a} {R1} } In this example, the volta is moved very far up because of that one note. This is very ugly IMO. Is there any way to insert a hole in the line and have the note stick up over the volta?

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

I explicitly consent! Regards Am 01.01.2018 16:45, schrieb Shane Brandes: I don't think anyone is blaming you. We are just trying to help you succeed. I think everyone here has encountered the dependency mismatch hell somewhere along the line. And it is never a good time. Take a few days off

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

I don't think anyone is blaming you. We are just trying to help you succeed. I think everyone here has encountered the dependency mismatch hell somewhere along the line. And it is never a good time. Take a few days off from fighting with it. Then try it again. regards, Shane On Mon, Jan 1, 2018

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 01-Jan-2018 11:39:29 +0100 schrieb li...@openlilylib.org: I think we have an issue with duplication of instructions. May I suggest to * replace the "Installing from source" sections on http://frescobaldi.org/download with links to the more detailed Wiki pages * Update the

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

You write "Ubuntu 17", there are two versions Ubuntu 17.04 (Zesty Zapus) On 17.04 I never got running frecobaldi3 and reported repeatedly about. Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) On 17.10 it is possible to install, as others confirmed reading the actual mails in the thread. An ubuntu update might

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 01.01.2018 um 01:35 schrieb Simon Albrecht: Oh please, did you even read what bb wrote? He was talking about that very same instruction, which has multiple issues: https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/1048 https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/1045 Also, one needs python-ly

Re: Guitar palm mutes - almost done

Am 31.12.2017 um 17:20 schrieb Neo Anderson: 1. How to change the look of the extender lines (dashes)? I'd like them to be more dense or compact. The following -\tweaks with various values won't make a difference.     -\tweak bound-details.dash-fraction #0     -\tweak

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Hi Urs and Simon, Since everybody wants to blame me here, I'll bow out. Something wrong with my Ubuntu 17. I can't make it work. I shall give up. Thanks all for the hints. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org