Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Hugh S. Myers
period and comma is how you tell old docs are originals and not just copys—flip them over and look at incised dots and such… On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Johan Vromans wrote: > Cute. Really cute. > > I did a lot of typing on an old Underwood when I was a kid and it

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Johan Vromans
Cute. Really cute. I did a lot of typing on an old Underwood when I was a kid and it looks very familiar. But IIRC the period and comma looked much heavier (maybe because my (lack of) typing skills at the time). What I also recall is that on a dual-colour typewriter (typically black/red) you

Re: Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Torsten, I _knew_ there was a proper answer to this somewhere. Thanks! Andrew On 16 February 2018 at 18:12, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: > > By design, an outside-staff object is not supposed to be placed inside the > staff. That's the simple reason why setting

Re: Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Torsten Hämmerle wrote > you may even set X-offset to any value inside the staff and the TextScript > will be placed there as desired. Addenda et corrigenda Sorry, I meant Y-offset, of course... -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Hi delboh, By design, an outside-staff object is not supposed to be placed inside the staff. That's the simple reason why setting Y-offset doesn't help---an outside-staff object just can't cross the border into the stave. *Remedy:* An outside-staff object can be made "inside-staff" by setting

Re: Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Ebo H
Thank you Andrew; both of the solutions you have provided will be useful. It had not occurred to me that adjusting position with 'extra-offset' would behave differently from setting 'X-offset' and 'Y-offset' directly. delboh del...@hotmail.com On 16 Feb 2018, at 12:52 am, Andrew Bernard

Re: missing document browser

2018-02-15 Thread Ben
On 2/15/2018 6:56 PM, Daryls_Produce wrote: I appreciated SFS's reply. Wisdom and experience are treasured! I played around with the windows on the right panel of the Frescobaldi screen, and found that the Document browser was there ... but there still isn't a tab at the bottom of the

Re: Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Delboh, You could also just draw in Postscript. ^\markup { \postscript #"0.25 setlinewidth 0 0 moveto 0 3 4 3 4 0 curveto stroke" } You can see the syntax is closely related. Some may object to that as it removes the possibility of producing SVG output. I have never needed SVG myself, and

Re: Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Delboh, Here's one way to do it. \once \override TextScript.extra-offset = #'(0 . -3.5) s4 ^\markup { \path #0.25 #'((moveto 0 0) (curveto 0 3 4 3 4 0) ) } s4 s4 s4 Not ideal, but sometimes using extra-offset is the quickest way to get the job done! Andrew

Positioning graphic markup inside staff

2018-02-15 Thread Ebo H
Dear Lilypond users, I am trying to position graphic markup within the staff. The example attached shows a simple graphic used extensively by Kurtag to indicate a long pause. It is straight-forward to draw the marking as a graphic in markup with a path. will move the graphic as expected, but

Re: missing document browser

2018-02-15 Thread Daryls_Produce
I appreciated SFS's reply. Wisdom and experience are treasured! I played around with the windows on the right panel of the Frescobaldi screen, and found that the Document browser was there ... but there still isn't a tab at the bottom of the right panel, like there is for the log and

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
mskala wrote > All present tense... there's no doubt that the narrow space is more common > *today*, but typewritten documents in the typewriter era (which ended in > roughly the 1980s) are not necessarily the same story. Sorry, I forgot to mention that DIN 5008 dates back to 1928. My mother, who

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread mskala
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: > Let me assure you that Urs is right: in Germany, without any doubt, there is > no double space. > It says that there is only ONE space after punctuation marks according to > German standards. > Finally Associated Press Stylebook (!): "Use a single

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Hugh Myers wrote > I had a good deal of correspondence with folks across the pond and never > thought twice about the double space post-sentence. Your're certainly right, but I strongly suspect that all this correspondence was in English. Let me assure you that Urs is right: in Germany, without

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread J Martin Rushton
As someone who does most of my work in monospaced fonts, the double space at the end of the sentence is essential. Without it you get the "wall of text" with no obvious breaks. What word processors do is of course down to the whims of the (perpetrator) programmer! On 15/02/18 18:04, Hugh S.

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Karlin High
On 2/15/2018 12:04 PM, Hugh S. Myers wrote: I had a good deal of correspondence with folks across the pond and never thought twice about the double space post-sentence. XKCD: "Third Way" https://xkcd.com/1285/ -- Karlin High Missouri, USA ___

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Hugh S. Myers
If memory serves (touch typist since 1963) it was assumed to be universal. I had a good deal of correspondence with folks across the pond and never thought twice about the double space post-sentence. I think with the advent of first the IBM Selectric and much later the Apple/Postscript

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread mskala
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Urs Liska wrote: > > that may not be standard for proportional typesetting (even LaTeX's > > standard 1.33 factor is no longer popular) but the double-width sentence > > space was universal in typewritten texts when typewriters were common. > > > > Are you sure this is not

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Urs, > Are you sure this is not related to language and culture? Perhaps this link will help clarify: Best, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email:

Re: Better way to get correct slur shapes?

2018-02-15 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hi Knute, how about this? \version "2.19.80" \language "english" dummy = #(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?)    #{ \hideNotes \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t \voiceTwo $mus \unHideNotes \revert NoteColumn.ignore-collision

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15.02.2018 um 17:29 schrieb msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca: On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Urs Liska wrote: Sorry for the OT post, but I just have to share this new LaTeX package: http://www.ctan.org/pkg/typewriter I really hope I'll find an opportunity to use it soon:-) Cute. For the genuine

Re: usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, sorry that I missed to handle the pull request earlier. As stated Martin had already fixed the issue a week ago. Now it's merged and available in the master branch. Best Urs Am 15.02.2018 um 16:59 schrieb Martin Neubauer: You could try making the che changes in my pull request to

Better way to get correct slur shapes?

2018-02-15 Thread Knute Snortum
I am hoping to get some feedback from the power LilyPond users on this list. I have a slurring problem that's not terribly difficult to solve, but I'm wondering if there's a better way to do it. Here's my example: %%% \version "2.19" \language "english" slurShapeA = \shape #'((0.75 . 2) (0.5 .

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread mskala
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Urs Liska wrote: > Sorry for the OT post, but I just have to share this new LaTeX package: > http://www.ctan.org/pkg/typewriter > > I really hope I'll find an opportunity to use it soon:-) Cute. For the genuine typewriter feel, it's important for the between-sentences space

Re: usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Martin Neubauer
You could try making the che changes in my pull request to your local copy and see if it fixes your problem. I think I got exactly that error message, but hey, that's more than a week ago, so what do I know... Good luck, Martin On 15/02/2018 16:00, Johannes Roeßler wrote: > added this issue...

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Shane Brandes
Hi Urs, The documentation and example, one and the same, are nicely convincing. Going to have to see if it can be pushed beyond the intended font. That really made my day. i have been wondering about such a trick for years. regards, Shane On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Urs Liska

Re: OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread David Wright
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:23:13 (+0100), Urs Liska wrote: > > Sorry for the OT post, but I just have to share this new LaTeX package: > http://www.ctan.org/pkg/typewriter > > I really hope I'll find an opportunity to use it soon:-) Neat, but do you also get this error when you run it on its own

Re: usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Johannes Roeßler
great hint Martin, so I was able to fix this issue for me... its indeed os-path-join instead of os-path-join-unix... thx! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Johannes Roeßler
added this issue... but just like discribed here - cant condense it further ;) Cheers Joei ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Martin Neubauer
Possibly there might even be a pull request for that already... On 15/02/2018 13:03, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > please add this to the issue tracker of the notation-fonts package on > Github. > > I know what it is and will be able to fix it later, maybe this evening. > > Best > Urs >

Re: Backing track creation with LilyPond

2018-02-15 Thread Graham King
On 14 Feb 2018, at 14:23, Karlin High wrote: > http://www.laweekly.com/news/instead-of-being-put-down-these-feral-cats-are-being-put-to-work-8963106 > > > Cats are a natural rodent deterrent, even if they're not actively hunting. > Mice can smell urinary proteins secreted by cats, snakes and

OT: typewriter LaTeX package

2018-02-15 Thread Urs Liska
Sorry for the OT post, but I just have to share this new LaTeX package: http://www.ctan.org/pkg/typewriter I really hope I'll find an opportunity to use it soon:-) Urs___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Johannes, please add this to the issue tracker of the notation-fonts package on Github. I know what it is and will be able to fix it later, maybe this evening. Best Urs Am 15.02.2018 um 12:59 schrieb Johannes Roeßler: Hi, I'm trying to change the music font according to the descrition

usage of OLL notation-fonts

2018-02-15 Thread Johannes Roeßler
Hi, I'm trying to change the music font according to the descrition on github: https://github.com/openlilylib/notation-fonts Whith this source code: \version "2.19.58" \include "oll-core/package.ily" \loadPackage notation-fonts \useNotationFont "beethoven" \relative c' {   c8 d e f g a b c

'divisi engraver' ignores \Remove(All)EmptyStaves

2018-02-15 Thread Rutger Hofman
Good morning list, I would like the 'divisi engraver' (Keep_alive_together_engraver with remove-layer and \targetstaff) to discard empty staves even if they are at an active VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer, if \RemoveEmptyStaves or \RemoveAllEmptyStaves is set. Currently, such empty staves are