Re: Markup wrap at the end of the line

2019-03-29 Thread Urs Liska
Am 29.03.19 um 21:01 schrieb Urs Liska:  -\markup \override #(line-width . 20) \wordwrap { This will be wrapped to some line-width } Sorry, that must read #'(line-width . 20) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Markup wrap at the end of the line

2019-03-29 Thread Urs Liska
Am 29.03.19 um 15:19 schrieb edes: el 2019-03-17 a las 11:33 Andrew Bernard escribió: Sorry, not the specific answer to your question. hi, thank you for your answer, and excuse my delayed response. leaving aside considerations if what i'm asking for is a good practice or not, should i

a curious workaround for flabby rounded-boxes

2019-03-29 Thread Robin Bannister
Hallo there I was looking to revamp my DIY fingering functions in the light of features available when moving from 2.18 to 2.20, e.g. I can get tighter positioning via TextScript.parent-alignment-X. There is a 'ringed' function for fingerings which need highlighting. Its bulbous \circle

Re: Markup wrap at the end of the line

2019-03-29 Thread David Kastrup
edes writes: > el 2019-03-16 a las 19:23 Saul Tobin escribió: > >> I agree that when a long markup stretches the measure at the end of a >> line, it suggests that there may be better ways of laying out the line >> breaks. >> >> Perhaps there should be a penalty for stretched measures due to

Re: Markup wrap at the end of the line

2019-03-29 Thread edes
el 2019-03-16 a las 19:23 Saul Tobin escribió: > I agree that when a long markup stretches the measure at the end of a > line, it suggests that there may be better ways of laying out the line > breaks. > > Perhaps there should be a penalty for stretched measures due to markup in > Lilypond's

Re: Markup wrap at the end of the line

2019-03-29 Thread edes
el 2019-03-17 a las 11:33 Andrew Bernard escribió: > Sorry, not the specific answer to your question. hi, thank you for your answer, and excuse my delayed response. leaving aside considerations if what i'm asking for is a good practice or not, should i understand that there's no way to allow a

Re: Define variable only if it doesn't exist / is unbound

2019-03-29 Thread David Kastrup
Pedro Pessoa writes: > Hello, > I want to init a variable only if it isn't bound. This seems a simple > matter, I was surpised I couldn't do it. > The thing is that it throws an 'unbound variable error' with anything I try. > I imagined something like: > > %%% pseudo > #(define var > (not

Re: Define variable only if it doesn't exist / is unbound

2019-03-29 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Fr., 29. März 2019 um 11:48 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill : > > On 2019-03-29 3:37 am, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am Fr., 29. März 2019 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Richard Shann > > : > >> This sounds like a problem I had when Denemo started running under > >> Guile 2 - I asked on the guile mailing list and

Re: Tangled up in Lilypond syntax

2019-03-29 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > On 2019-03-27 4:19 pm, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> That’s great… But essentially all of the documentation has \relative >> at the top-level. So what is a newbie to think, other than "My code >> should look like >> >> \paper { … } >> >> \header {…} >> >> \relative c' { … } >>

Re: Define variable only if it doesn't exist / is unbound

2019-03-29 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-03-29 3:37 am, Thomas Morley wrote: Am Fr., 29. März 2019 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Richard Shann : This sounds like a problem I had when Denemo started running under Guile 2 - I asked on the guile mailing list and got fixed up with this: ;;; for guile 2.0 compatibility define the

Re: Define variable only if it doesn't exist / is unbound

2019-03-29 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Fr., 29. März 2019 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Richard Shann : > > On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 18:22 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote: > > On 2019-03-28 3:14 pm, Thomas Morley wrote: > > > Am Do., 28. März 2019 um 22:22 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill > > > : > > > > > > > > On 2019-03-28 2:18 pm, Valentin Villenave wrote: >

Re: Define variable only if it doesn't exist / is unbound

2019-03-29 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Fr., 29. März 2019 um 02:23 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill : > > On 2019-03-28 3:14 pm, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am Do., 28. März 2019 um 22:22 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill > > : > >> > >> On 2019-03-28 2:18 pm, Valentin Villenave wrote: > >> > On 3/28/19, Pedro Pessoa wrote: > >> >> I imagined something

Re: treble and bass clef simultaneously

2019-03-29 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Do., 28. März 2019 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley : > > Am Do., 28. März 2019 um 08:02 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG : > > > > > > > here my factious approach: [...] > > > > Thanks a lot! Attached is the same sample code as with Aaron's > > solution. Do you see a possibility to make leading

Re: Define variable only if it doesn't exist / is unbound

2019-03-29 Thread Richard Shann
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 18:22 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote: > On 2019-03-28 3:14 pm, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am Do., 28. März 2019 um 22:22 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill > > : > > > > > > On 2019-03-28 2:18 pm, Valentin Villenave wrote: > > > > On 3/28/19, Pedro Pessoa wrote: > > > > > I imagined something

A lyric problem - with one possible solution

2019-03-29 Thread Don Gingrich
These are slightly "rich" minimum examples since I've used different colours for the verses -- in part to make the problem with the initial example more clearly visible and to show the desired result in the second example. My solution can best be described as "brute force and ignorance" and I'd

Re: reinstating hidden stave

2019-03-29 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi Andrew, This came up as one of my queries a short while ago. It appears to be a surprisingly tricky topic. Have a look back through the archives for the full discussion. Here's the code I came up with. Hope this helps. Andrew %== \version "2.19.82" % manual staff hiding and showing