On 27/04/2019 05:39, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello folks,
Who decided to switch from .xml to .musicxml, and what was the supposed gain in
the move? I now find that some text editors don’t propose such files in their
file open dialog..
The change is recorded on the MusicXML GitHub page
Found this in the Wiki on MusicXML
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/30/music_as_mark_up/ . News to me,
tho maybe not to anyone else.
For convenience: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicXML .
Rgds, G.
-Original Message-
From: Jacques Menu
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 12:39
I love your album! Thanks for sharing it with us!
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Malte,
Am 27.04.19 um 10:49 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Am 26.04.19 um 14:45 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
I might also be willing to use LaTeX for the creation of the symbols
because I could then combine efforts for a standalone LaTeX package
to produce the symbols in continuous text too.
I'd
Hi Lukas and all,
Am 26.04.19 um 23:15 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
Hi,
but I have to some degree lost track of
much of the discussion of the last 20 years, and when I actively worked
with that kind of written harmonic analysis (while at the
Musikhochschule) I didn't have much of a scholarly
A very creditable production. Don't worry about the letter/A4 issue, it
printed out perfectly on my A4 system. There is one problem though, the
tempo marks have all printed as odd line shapes: steps, symbols like pi
or just vertical bars. The display in Firefox is correct however.
It was
