Le 18/09/2022 à 22:43, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
may this also be used in 2.22.2. ?
Now I errors :-(
Here is a version of the same snippet that should work in 2.22:
\version "2.22.2"
#(define-event-class 'event 'StreamEvent) % cough
"|" = { | #(make-music 'Event 'is-bar-check #t) }
Le 18/09/2022 à 18:49, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion a écrit :
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.13. This is
termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However,
if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the
current stable
may this also be used in 2.22.2. ?
Now I errors :-(
regards, Eef
Op 18 sep. 2022, om 22:16 heeft Mats Bengtsson
mailto:matsboxergr...@gmail.com>> het volgende
geschreven:
Brilliant! This will be in an include file that I will use for all my future
projects (until it gets included in the
Brilliant! This will be in an include file that I will use for
all my future projects (until it gets included in the LilyPond
distribution).
/Mats
On 2022-09-18 21:33, Jean Abou Samra
wrote:
Le 18/09/2022 à 20:32,
Hi Valentin;
Thank you.
Regarding point #1, I don't understand what (how to) to change it so
that it is Score level. Would I place the same command inside the
\layout {} block inside the \score section? Do I invoke it in the
same way?
Regarding point #2, I'm still trying to understand
Le 18/09/2022 à 20:32, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Hi,
I've been pondering about a missing feature in LilyPond, namely the
possibility to get a warning printout if there isn't an explicit bar
check ("|") in the input file at the end of each measure. This would
catch many of the typos I
Thanks for mentioning this. I too have encountered this problem.
Ken Wolcott
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:33 AM Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been pondering about a missing feature in LilyPond, namely the
> possibility to get a warning printout if there isn't an explicit bar check
>
Hi,
I've been pondering about a missing feature in LilyPond, namely
the possibility to get a warning printout if there isn't an
explicit bar check ("|") in the input file at the end of each
measure. This would catch many of the typos I personally do when
Hi Ken,
note that it would be reasonable to create these Marks on a Score level, not
on a Staff level.
If you are using a sufficiently recent development version you can also make
use
of the \repeat segno function, somewhat like this:
\version "2.23.12"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
Hi Knute;
Thank you for reminding me to share :-)
I did not find a precise search phrase that I should have used but
"Controlling the vertical ordering of scripts" in the Notation
Reference comes close; reading the entire section helped.
What I saw there reminded me of what I had been
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.13. This is
termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However,
if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the
current stable release. Please refer to the Installing section in the
Learning Manual for
Hello Laurent,
Fresco 3.1.3 is fine on Mac for me.
JM
Envoyé de mon iPhone
> Le 18 sept. 2022 à 16:22, pagani laurent a écrit :
>
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I have macported Frescobaldi and started to play with it.
> I don’t find it very explicit for the errors, and while it complains there
>
> It does, although maybe not very easy to find (and perhaps not the most
> polished part of Frescobaldi): Tools > Coding > Quick insert.
Au temps pour moi. Indeed, well-hidden but very useful. Great! It looks very
much like muscore I think.
L.
La NRA dit que les tueries de masse sont le
>
> Worth noting that the Notation Reference has an appendix with a cheat
> sheet covering most basic notation.
>
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/cheat-sheet
Ah great! I was hoping for something like that indeed!
Thanks a lot.
Going to bed, bye folks! and thanks for
Le 18/09/2022 à 16:22, pagani laurent a écrit :
Unlike Latex editors (texstudio, or texshop e.g.), it does not have
the list of reserved words/commands in lateral menus to retrieve
quickly something you don’t remember.
It does, although maybe not very easy to find (and perhaps not the most
Le 18/09/2022 à 17:35, pagani laurent a écrit :
It is correct that all notes belonging to the same chord do have the
same duration
There are numerous counter-examples (for the strings at least) and
then I guess that you consider that lines with different durations are
parallel voices not
Le dim. 18 sept. 2022 à 17:21, pagani laurent a
écrit :
>
> The last detail is that sometimes, the shorter notes are not completed by
> rests (string instruments) but I sort of remember to have seen that rests
> could be masked, possibly the answer.
>
Yes, that's it: use skip (s) rather than
Hello Jean-Julien,
Thanks for the tip. Yes, in the Introduction to Lily, they introduce chords
with <<>> and later they say, you only need <> but without much explanation.
It works indeed (the same system of voices as with Finale and possibly Muscore
if I remember correctly).
The last detail is
Hi Laurent,
It is correct that all notes belonging to the same chord do have the same
duration (though
it is possible to change the note head for some notes to that of a different
duration). Note
that this behaviour is something you get from pretty much all notation
softwares. If you
want
Hello Laurent,
Le dim. 18 sept. 2022 à 16:23, pagani laurent a
écrit :
> Unlike Latex editors (texstudio, or texshop e.g.), it does not have the
> list of reserved words/commands in lateral menus to retrieve quickly
> something you don’t remember. But I guess there are not so many things to
>
Hi Valentin,
I have macported Frescobaldi and started to play with it.
I don’t find it very explicit for the errors, and while it complains there are
errors it still displays the result (more or less). The really positive point
is indeed to show the notes between the pdf and the .ly. It has
Hi all,
I am fluent English speaker, no problem, but thanks for the French link.
Thanks for the explanations and for the two-ways editor (my Latex ed is also
going both ways).
I am most familiar with XEmacs but as for Latex, I am ready to use a specific
editor like Frescobaldi indeed.
The only
Hi Laurent, Hi Pierre,
usually using Bar checks is the way to go, but this does have its own
limitations. E.g. if we misspell
\time 3/4 c2 d4 |
as
\time 3/4 c2 d1 |
this will not throw an error. Of course we could make use of bar number
checks. But then, bar number checks only work if you
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 9:36 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> HI;
>
> I found what I was looking for; sorry to waste your time...
Why not share what you found so others can learn from it?
--
Knute Snortum
Hi Laurent,
As you can see, Jan redirected you to the lilypond-user mailing list, which
is the primary discussion 'forum' for LilyPond.
Since your name sounds French: there is also a French-speaking equivalent of
this list, lilypond-user-fr. I'm mentioning it just in case you are more
Hi Laurent, Hi Jan,
@Laurent, see:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/bars.html#bar-and-bar-number-checks
e.g.:
\version "2.22.0"
{ c' e' g' e'1 | 2 }
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 18 sept. 2022 à 11:02, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit :
> pagani laurent writes:
>
> Can someone answer
pagani laurent writes:
Can someone answer Laurent?
> Hi Jan,
>
> Sorry to disturb you (possibly I should have gone to some forum but
> this is so fundamental for me that if the answer is no, I won’t use
> Lilypond, so I don’t want to bother entering the forum if it is to
> leave it immediately).
27 matches
Mail list logo
