Re: overriding digit-names

2023-06-29 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le jeudi 29 juin 2023 à 18:21 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit : > Are there any Scheme interpreters/versions that didn't at any point of > time?  Just curious. To be honest, I have no idea. I just know a bit about the Scheme standards because of school projects, but I don't have practical

Re: overriding digit-names

2023-06-29 Thread David Kastrup
Jean Abou Samra writes: > Le jeudi 29 juin 2023 à 17:56 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit : > >> No, none of the "standards" say anything like that.  #(...) is a >> self-quoting form, like #t and #f and numbers and strings and some other >> things.  Quoting them doesn't change a thing. >> >> And to

Re: overriding digit-names

2023-06-29 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le jeudi 29 juin 2023 à 17:56 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit : > No, none of the "standards" say anything like that.  #(...) is a > self-quoting form, like #t and #f and numbers and strings and some other > things.  Quoting them doesn't change a thing. > > And to be honest, I don't know of any

Re: overriding digit-names

2023-06-29 Thread David Kastrup
Jean Abou Samra writes: > Le mercredi 28 juin 2023 à 21:35 -0400, William Rehwinkel via LilyPond user > discussion a écrit : >> Dear John, >> >> You need to add another pound sign before the list. StrokeFinger.digit-names >> is a vector, with is a guile-specific construct not a standard list. >

Re: overriding digit-names

2023-06-29 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le mercredi 28 juin 2023 à 21:35 -0400, William Rehwinkel via LilyPond user discussion a écrit : > Dear John, > > You need to add another pound sign before the list. StrokeFinger.digit-names > is a vector, with is a guile-specific construct not a standard list. Just FYI in passing, vectors are