Re: nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread waterhorsemusic
Fortunately I always use the latest development version. I'll try this in a while.Thank you!Paul Sent from my Galaxy Original message From: Carl Sorensen Date: 4/8/24 4:00 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Paul Scott Cc: Simon Albrecht , Lilypond-User Mailing List , Jean Abou Samra

Re: nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:51 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:14 AM Paul Scott > wrote: > >> >> The case at the moment is with long groups of triplets of which the >> following is now a part: >> >> { >>\time 2/4 >>\tuplet 3/2 8 { >> a'16 16 \set

Re: nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:14 AM Paul Scott wrote: > > The case at the moment is with long groups of triplets of which the > following is now a part: > > { >\time 2/4 >\tuplet 3/2 8 { > a'16 16 \set stemRightBeamCount = 1 16 \set stemLeftBeamCount = 1 > 16 16 16 >} > } > > I

Re: Minimize flats or sharps in transposed key signature?

2024-04-08 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> I'm using \transpose pretty heavily, and I'm running into an issue I don't > quite know how to solve. I'm aware of the \naturalizeMusic hack described > in the LilyPond documentation. I'm looking for something similar, but for > key signatures. This was discussed in the past, for example I

Minimize flats or sharps in transposed key signature?

2024-04-08 Thread Eric Benson
I'm using \transpose pretty heavily, and I'm running into an issue I don't quite know how to solve. I'm aware of the \naturalizeMusic hack described in the LilyPond documentation. I'm looking for something similar, but for key signatures. When a \key specification gets transposed, I would like to

Re: nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread Paul Scott
On 4/8/24 9:46 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote: Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write this now incorrect code: a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a single beam. The question is: what

Re: nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote: Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write this now incorrect code: a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a single beam. The question is: what is the context and why do you want this?

Re: nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le lundi 08 avril 2024 à 09:22 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit : > Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write > this now incorrect code: > > a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined > by a single beam. > > I have looked at NR 1,2,4 A

nested beaming

2024-04-08 Thread Paul Scott
Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write this now incorrect code: a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]]  i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined by a single beam. I have looked at NR 1,2,4 TIA, Paul

Re: indicate scordatura at beginning of piece

2024-04-08 Thread Valentin Petzel
Hello Dirck, you might be interested in something I recently made for music SE. Essentially this will add two new engravers that automatically annotate the string tuning whenever it changes. Cheers, Valentin\version "2.24" % Used for printing the actual changes. A procedure that takes the