ts).
Have you come across this behaviour?
David
On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 18:22 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-01-17 17:36 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> > Thank you for the suggestion (below) for controlling the actual length
> > of hairpins. I am afrai
pin, but then the
viola part gives a similar warning in a later bar.
I am using Lilypond 2.19.30.
David
On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 22:35 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2015-12-12 17:46 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> > Although I quite often find myself needing
On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 20:15 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-01-17 19:21 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
>
> >
> > The only trouble is, I am getting a lot of compiler errors and warnings.
> > For each of the relevant layout blocks, I get:
> >
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 23:00 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> %% a helper:
> #(define (look-up-for-parent name-symbol axis grob)
> "Return the parent of @var{grob}, specified by it's @var{name-symbol}
> in
> axis @var{axis} of @var{grob}. If @var{grob} is already equal to the
> grob
> named
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 16:26 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 19.01.2016 16:20, David Sumbler wrote:
> > Is there a way of displaying the current value of particular variables
> > and parameters during Lilypond compilation?
>
> Of course, e.g. with
> #(format "
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 11:30 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > But surely this will affect both ends of the hairpin.
>
> You’d think so, wouldn’t you?
> But that hasn’t been my experience.
> Try it, and let me know how it works.
>
> > Can the ends not be controlled separately?
>
> As I
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 22:33 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 22.01.2016 22:18, David Sumbler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 16:26 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> >> On 19.01.2016 16:20, David Sumbler wrote:
> >>> Is there a way of displaying the current
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 11:15 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-01-21 16:54 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
>
> > I have tried substituting \! for my \invP markings, and replacing my
> > tweaked -\ten markings with standard -- marks.
>
> Please, tell
On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 13:27 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-01-21 16:54 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
>
> >
> > Unfortunately I am still getting some over-long hairpins. I think that
> > perhaps this has nothing to do with myHairpinMinimumLen
> From: David Nalesnik
> \offset only works on properties that have a default value listed in
> the grob pages in the IR (derived from the alist in
> scm/define-grobs.scm). There is no default value listed for
> KeyCancellation.X-extent, hence the warning.
This
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:26 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >> From: David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >> \offset only works on properties that have a default value listed in
>
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 11:57 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:26 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
> >>
> >>
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 01:27 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-01-19 1:04 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > 2016-01-18 22:56 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> >
> >> After spending some h
Is there a way of displaying the current value of particular variables
and parameters during Lilypond compilation?
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I find that consecutive hairpins (e.g. {c\< d\>}) are too closely spaced
in standard Lilypond output.
Looking at Elaine Gould's wonderful book "Behind Bars", I notice that in
such cases her examples show one hairpin ending at the left-hand edge of
a note and the next beginning at the right-hand
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:22 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > How can I change the default so that hairpins normally stop at the
> > left-hand edge of the final note?
>
> Adjust the bound-padding.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Kieren.
But surely this will affect both ends of the
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 00:13 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Don’t forget to always edit the subject line :-)
> Replying to individual e-mails instead of digests would be even better,
> since this will allow sorting by thread.
>
> Best, Simon
My apologies. Sometimes I remember. But 'always' is
> > From: Alberto Simões
> > Reply-to: al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt
> > To: lilypond
> > Subject: Music Notation/Interpretation question
> > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:38:51 +0100
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > This is not exactly a Lilypond doubt...
>
When editing a piece with several instruments and several movements,
there are various outputs I would like, such as a complete full score, a
full score of a single movement, a complete instrumental part, the
instrument part of a single movement, and also a midi file of any of
these items.
I
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:12 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> > From: Noeck
> > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Lilypond structure / implicit - explicit / with
> > statement
> > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:11:51 +0200
> >
> > Would the table in the
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 14:13 -0700, David Bellows wrote:
> >
> > I have just installed Ubuntu 16.04 to replace my previous 12.04
> > system,
> > and installed LilyPond v.2.19.40.
> >
> > In my ~/.emacs file I already had
> Here's my .emacs file for Kubuntu 16.04:
>
>
> (setq load-path (append
I have just installed Ubuntu 16.04 to replace my previous 12.04 system,
and installed LilyPond v.2.19.40.
In my ~/.emacs file I already had
(autoload 'LilyPond-mode "lilypond-mode")
(setq auto-mode-alist (cons '("\\.ily$" . LilyPond-mode) auto-mode-alist))
(add-hook 'LilyPond-mode-hook (lambda
David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
> As an experiment, I produced this:
>
> File: experimentNotes.ly
>
> \version "2.19.24"
>
> compileA =
> \score {
> \new Staff {
>a' a' a' a'
> }
> \layout { }
> }
[...]
> #(if sect
In starting to experiment with selective compilation using includes
and/or the $(if condition action) structure provided by David Kastrup, I
found that there is something very, very basic that I have never really
understood.
So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:51 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> > In starting to experiment with selective compilation using includes
> > and/or the $(if condition action) structure provided by David Kastrup, I
> > found that
Thank you all for your help on this.
My original question, "how does Lilypond recognize the end of the
definition of a variable" has been answered: the definition has to be a
single, complete expression.
Which of course produces another question: "what is classed as a single
expression?"
Well,
>
> That way you can change the appearance of the toc-items and the
> rehearsalmarks in one place.
>
> HTH
> Jan-Peter
>
>
> Am 01.02.2017 um 22:03 schrieb David Sumbler:
> >
> > I want to have a table o
On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 15:48 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 04/02/17 14:10, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does
> > not allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
> Probably because the underlying code makes i
Thank you all for the various suggestions regarding this problem.
Some of the latest posts have left me slightly bewildered: I wasn't
aware that there was a problem with having a RehearsalMark and a
MetronomeMark at the same point in a piece. Of course, they are
formatted and aligned differently
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 14:59 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> How would you deal with the case where \songName landed on a break?
> That's the problem I've had to wrestle with in the past. You'd want
> the fermata at the end of a line but the song title at the start of
> the next.
In the particular
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 23:01 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2017-02-04 15:10 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> > So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does
> > not
> > allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
> >
> >
A text mark in Lilypond is represented by a grob called a
RehearsalMark; the grob for a tempo marking is called a MetronomeMark.
I wonder whether perhaps these names reflect something about the
history of Lilypond: they are certainly not accurate descriptions of
what the objects are used for -
I want to have a table of contents with the titles of sections of a
piece and the relevant page numbers.
In pieces I have set previously, the title of each movement was placed
centrally over the first line of the score/part for that movement. I
set the variable "piece" in the header for each
\version "2.19.48"
global = { \key e \minor \time 2/4 }
\score {
<<
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff {
\global r4 b''16( ais'' b'' b''')
}
\new Staff {
\clef "tenor" \global
b16( ais b e') dis'( b fis) r
}
>>
\new Staff
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:04 -0700, Klaus Blum wrote:
> Hum... I knew I was missing something even shorter:
>
> (Left Hand)
> \shiftOff 4\arpeggio ~ \stemDown q8\noBeam
> \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t % Just add
> this and
> you're done :-)
> c -.
>
>
On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 11:11 +0100, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> On 2017-01-28 11:04, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I’m having some trouble with MIDI right now and would like to
> > verify
> > if the problem lies with playback. Could someone tell me whether
> > the
> >
On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 23:47 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 21.01.2017 21:46, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > could somebody explain to me what the warning
> > actually means, and what I would need to do to stop it appearing?
> It signifies problem in the calculation of
In the piece I am setting there is some perhaps slightly unorthodox
notation. One bar is still giving me a problem. I attach the output
of this and the following bar.
I am quite pleased with the result apart from one detail: the last
quaver of the first bar should appear as a single notehead on
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 19:49 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 14:49 +, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the responses to my question.
> >
> > Unfortunately,
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 14:49 +, David Sumbler wrote:
> In 2 of the set of 6 songs I have (rather slowly) been setting, I
> want
> 2 sets of words: the original, and an English version. In each of
> the
> other 4 songs there is just one set of words.
>
> After much expe
In 2 of the set of 6 songs I have (rather slowly) been setting, I want
2 sets of words: the original, and an English version. In each of the
other 4 songs there is just one set of words.
After much experimentation and a lot of failures, I found a way of
doing what I wanted, which is to use
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 22:58 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 13.02.2017 17:43, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The piece I am setting can be sung by a baritone or by a mezzo-
> > > soprano.
> > > In the score, therefore, there are 2 vocal staves, one for each
> > > of the
> > >
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 12:03 +, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Sumbler" <da...@aeolia.co.uk>
> >
> > 2) I may
> > be mistaken, since I am not generally involved in performing vocal
> > music, but I think it woul
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 12:20 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >
> > That seems to work perfectly.
> Glad to hear it.
>
> >
> > I'll experiment a bit with the 2 VerticalAxisGroup settings, to see
> > if
> > I can understand the effect each of them has, for my greater
> >
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 23:01 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Meanwhile why not use some of the workarounds?
>
> (1)
> \mark \markup <\[center-]column>
> (already mentioned)
>
> (2)
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=976
> or
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=977
>
> (3)
>
The piece I am setting can be sung by a baritone or by a mezzo-soprano.
In the score, therefore, there are 2 vocal staves, one for each of the
alternative voices. The staves contain identical music apart from an
octave diffence in pitch and different clefs.
It seems sensible to print the words
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 11:43 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >
> > The piece I am setting can be sung by a baritone or by a mezzo-
> > soprano.
> > In the score, therefore, there are 2 vocal staves, one for each of
> > the
> > alternative voices. The staves contain identical
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote:
> arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context. Rewriting its
> definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here:
>
> arpeggioArrowUp = {
> \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.stencil
> \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.X-extent
> \override
The piece I am setting has 4 bars of somewhat unorthodox notation. My
best attempt at reproducing this is:
%%
\version "2.19.48"
lv = \laissezVibrer
lvUp = \once \override LaissezVibrerTie.direction = #UP
rt = \repeatTie
rtDown = \once \override RepeatTie.direction = #DOWN
\new
%%%
\version "2.19.48"
<<
\new Staff {
\relative {
c'2 d4 e | f1 |
}
\addlyrics { First set of words; }
\relative {
g'4 f e d| c1 |
}
\addlyrics { se -- cond set of words. }
}
\new Staff {
R1*4 |
}
>>
%%%
The above works as I would like it
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 08:00 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >
> > Can somebody show me a working version of the above? And/or a way
> > of piecing together lyrics using variables?
> Something like this?
>
> \version "2.19.48"
>
> lyricsA = \lyricmode { First set of words; }
>
%
\version "2.19.48"
\new PianoStaff <<
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\new Staff {
\arpeggioArrowUp
1\arpeggio
}
\new Staff {
\arpeggioArrowUp
\clef "bass" 1\arpeggio
}
>>
%
The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two
Sorry - I pressed "Send" too soon on my previous message, which
contains some nonsense. Here is a more sensible version.
The piece I am setting has 4 bars of somewhat unorthodox notation. My
best attempt at reproducing this is:
%%
\version "2.19.48"
lv = \laissezVibrer
lvUp =
\version "2.19.48"
pizz = \markup { \larger \italic "pizz." }
midiPizz = \set Staff.midiInstrument = "pizzicato strings"
arco = \markup { \larger \italic "arco" }
midiArco = \set Staff.midiInstrument = "violin"
\score {
\relative c'' {
\new Staff \with {
I am using 2.19.48, and I haven't noticed any problems with it.
But is there anywhere a list of changes between successive "unstable"
versions? I can't find it.
The "Changes" manual doesn't help, because it is work in progress
(presumably) showing all the changes between 2.18 and what will
.
David
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 21:25 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 05.11.2016 um 21:20 schrieb David Sumbler:
> >
> > It always seems to be a bit hit-and-miss for me when I try to arrange
> > the pagination of instrumental parts. Reading the manual it isn't
> > cl
Sorry - '#ff' was a typo in my email, but not in my Lilypond files.
David
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 13:42 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > Thanks for the help with the problem of getting page-turns and
> > numb
italic "(non "
> #:dynamic "sf"
> #:normal-text #:italic ")"))
>
> On 03/11/2016 23:37, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > Well, it's proving tricky to me, anyway.
> >
> > I have a note which needs to
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
> Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
> >
> > How do I find out what changes have been made between (for
> > instance)
> > 2.19.48 and 2.19.49?
> You could read the commit messages in the git lo
.
> >
> > HTH
> > Jan-Peter
> >
> > Am 7. November 2016 23:55:00 MEZ, schrieb Simon Albrecht
> > <simon.albre...@mail.de>:
> >
> > On 07.11.2016 17:56, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 17:56 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > I had the following lines in the main file of my current Lilypond
> > project:
> >
> > \book {
> > \bookOutputName "../firs
I had the following lines in the main file of my current Lilypond
project:
\book {
\bookOutputName "../firstCello"
partName = "Cello 1"
\include "frontcover.ily"
\bookpart { %music...
The file "frontcover.ily" contains a \bookpart block which prints a
front cover with title,
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 16:11 +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 15:35, David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.u
> k>
> ha scritto:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
> > >
> > >
> &
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 22:00 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 04.11.2016 00:32, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > It certainly does help! I had not realized that the '-' that goes
> > before the tweak is additional to, and does not replace, the '-'
> > (or
> > '^' or
It always seems to be a bit hit-and-miss for me when I try to arrange
the pagination of instrumental parts. Reading the manual it isn't
clear to me how I can force page turns to occur *only* at the points I
choose.
Also, Lilypond doesn't like ending on an even-numbered page. How can I
force it
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:02 +0100, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 23:09 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 21:19 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 23:54 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 13.10.2016 14:41, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:10 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > But I r
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 12:07 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi David:
>
> 2016-10-11 15:51 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> >
> > The reasons for the long gap were (a) moving house in February and,
> > more importantly (b) feeling
On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 23:09 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 21:19 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
&g
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 13:59 +0100, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 17:44 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-10-21 17:00 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 13:59 +0100, David Sumbler wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Mark Knoop <m...@opus11.net> writes:
>
> >
> > At 17:11 on 21 Oct 2016, David Sumbler wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
\version "2.19.46"
\language "english"
%%Vn2 bars 276-279
\relative e' {
\time 3/2 1.\p\< ~ | q ~ | q | |
%%Vn2 bars 280-283
<< { \stemUp d2(\mp bf1 ~ | bf1. ~ | bf ~ | bf1)} \\ {f1. ~ | f ~ | f
~ | f1 } >> r2 |
}
The above extract from one of my files compiles to give the result I
Thanks, both, for the helpful answers to this problem.
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 installed
> > complete with readline, I'd be very grateful if somebody could
> > explain
>
Hi David
I can only echo the good wishes and thanks that others have already
expressed. Lilypond is a great program - the more I use it the more I
can see the potential if I can ever get my head around the finer
points.
Meanwhile the list provides great support, and you have been a major
Thanks for these 2 replies. I have tidied things up a bit by using
\once \omit Accidental
as suggested by Noeck.
David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about
(which is good!). The quoted "@", \single and \etc were all
effectively new to me - although I must have read
In Lilypond we have '!' to force an accidental to appear and '?' to
produce a cautionary accidental.
Is there any similarly simple way to prevent an accidental being
printed where it otherwise would be?
Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous -
but I just wondered if
\version "2.19.48"
\language "english"
<< { d'4 b'2.\rest }
\\
{ b1 }
>>
The above bar occurs in a piece I have set in Lilypond and that I am
currently correcting.
The crotchet d in the upper voice and the semibreve b in the lower
appear to be vertically aligned at their left edges,
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 14:03 +0100, Karol Majewski wrote:
> In traditional engraving note heads are aligned to their left. Take a
> look at this excerpt from Monnlight Sonata by Henle Verlag.
I've looked at my own copy of the same piece - different edition - and
the notes are aligned just as you
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 21:40 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-11-18 20:36 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> >
> > I have a bar which contains 3 notes, e.g.
> >
> > fs4 ds as' |
> >
> > It comes after a passage which is pizzicato, but t
I have a bar which contains 3 notes, e.g.
fs4 ds as' |
It comes after a passage which is pizzicato, but the 2nd and 3rd notes
of this bar need to be arco. However, a normal "arco" marking over the
d sharp does not make it sufficiently clear that that is what is
intended: particularly because of
On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 00:27 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 18.11.2016 22:41, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > I need to study this (and the previous answer) to see if I can
> > fathom
> > out the logic of it all.
> \tweak is a music function (which means it returns
On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 19:58 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 00:27 +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18.11.2016 22:41, David Sumbler wrote:
> > > >
> >
I have a piece with several movements. One of the movements is marked
'segue' at the end, and finishes with a semibreve in each instrument.
The note in the 2nd cello part is tied to the first note of the next
movement. Each movement is in a separate \score block (both in the
full score and in
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:18 +, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Sumbler" <da...@aeolia.co.uk>
> To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 2:50 PM
> Subject: Tie for segue at end of movement
> >
>
Well, it's proving tricky to me, anyway.
I have a note which needs to have "pizz." printed above it, and "(non
sf)" below.
The code below, of course, puts both markings with their left edges
aligned with the note.
\version "2.19.48"
\language "english"
nonsf = \markup
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 23:49 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-11-03 23:37 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> >
> > Well, it's proving tricky to me, anyway.
> >
> > I have a note which needs to have "pizz." printed above it, and
> &
\version "2.19.48"
\language "english"
vn =
\new Staff \relative g'' {
g1 \bar "||" \time 6/8 \tempo "Vivace"
R2. | \grace { g16( a } g4.) g |
}
vc =
\new Staff \relative g' {
g2 g \bar "||" \time 6/8 \tempo "Vivace"
\grace { g16( a } g2.) ~ | g |
}
\score {
\new StaffGroup <<
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 23:35 +1100, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> You have stumbled upon a known lilypond issue with grace notes. Have
> a read of the 'known issues and warnings' section under Grace Notes
> in the NR, Section 1.2.6 which explains this and what to do, which
> you have
After a 9 month gap, I have finally come back to Lilypond and will
attempt to finish tweaking my string quartet score and parts. I have
installed v2.19.48, and I have run 'convert-ly' on my files.
The reasons for the long gap were (a) moving house in February and,
more importantly (b) feeling
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:10 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >
> > But I realise that often what I need in order to get satisfactory
> > hairpins is more space between the note heads, and simply moving
> > the
> > ends of the hairpin does not reposition the relevant notes.
> Have
My ~/.guile file reads:
(use-modules (ice-9 readline))
(activate-readline)
When I run 'guile' from the command line, readline works fine.
But when I run 'lilypond scheme-sandbox' I get:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.48
Processing
On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 14:28 +0100, David Sumbler wrote:
> My ~/.guile file reads:
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 readline))
> (activate-readline)
>
> When I run 'guile' from the command line, readline works fine.
>
> But when I run 'lilypond scheme-sandbox' I
On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 21:19 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes:
>
> >
> > Further to the above, I find that if I type
> >
> > /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/guile
> >
> > then readline works just fine.
> G
Thanks for this and other replies to my original query. The routine
works well.
It does what it says on the can - moving the ends of the hairpin - and
that will be very useful.
But I realise that often what I need in order to get satisfactory
hairpins is more space between the note heads, and
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 23:11 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-12-05 16:29 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
>
> >
> > But two questions have occurred to me arising out of this.
> >
> > 1) Plug-ins for most contexts can be added or removed eit
eMusic
}
%
As I mentioned before, the final line produces an " unexpected
BOOK_IDENTIFIER" error, but not if the preceding \bookOutputName line
is commented out.
What is going on here?
David
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 14:48 +, David Sumbler wrote:
> I have again been trying to build up a
evel defining a variable into
> > the
> > current parser.
> >
> > HTH
> > Jan-Peter
> >
> > Am 7. November 2016 23:55:00 MEZ, schrieb Simon Albrecht
> > <simon.albre...@mail.de>:
> >
> > On 07.11.2016 17:56, David Kastr
%
\version "2.19.48"
\language "english"
{ \time 4/2 R1*4/2 }
%
The above prints a breve rest in the middle of the bar.
I want the "normal" whole-bar rest to appear instead, i.e. a semibreve
rest.
After much experimentation and searching online and in the Lilypond
docs, the best I
101 - 200 of 356 matches
Mail list logo