ley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2016-03-18 20:14 GMT+01:00 Redwood (Daniel) <redwood5...@icloud.com>:
>> Attached are 3 files to recreate the problem.
>>
>> lilypond bug.ly generates lilypond.pdf along with some error messages.
>>
>> The pr
of the first measure:
> \grace s4
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> Redwood (Daniel)
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 12:15 PM
>
Hi all,
I’m converting from Sibelius. Not a simple, quick project. I have probably more
than a hundred scores in Sibelius. So I’m looking for reasons to do this, aside
from the difficulty of their licensing scheme.
One thing I love about lilypond: when I find a file on IMSLP with the source.
Maybe, but then putting them on IMSLP?
I suppose.
-d
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 5:54 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> "Redwood (Daniel)" <redwood5...@icloud.com> writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’m converting from Sibelius. Not a simple, q
; On Monday, March 21, 2016, Redwood (Daniel) <redwood5...@icloud.com
> <mailto:redwood5...@icloud.com>> wrote:
> Maybe, but then putting them on IMSLP?
>
> I suppose.
>
> -d
> > On Mar 21, 2016, at 5:54 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org <javascript:
