On Apr 26, 2012, at 1:49 PM, flup2 wrote:
One of the best way to use lilypond-book with TeXShop is to use a dedicated
engine. Nicola Vitacolonna, a lilypond and LaTeX user, made a very
interesting one. You can find it here :
On May 6, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Corbin Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a project (github.com/mostawesomedude/lye) where one of the
main formats is a strict subset of Lilypond syntax. I want to introduce swung
eighths, but don't know what syntax Lilypond plans to adopt for it. What's
the
On May 24, 2012, at 1:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
twice.
This in unfortunately more
On May 24, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors? I
see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
donates developers to projects the company have an interest in.
Hmm. OpenOffice for
On May 28, 2012, at 9:29 AM, James Harkins wrote:
Related: I can't say I read the list very closely, so somehow I overlooked
the fact before that David K.'s livelihood comes from working on Lilypond. I
had assumed Lilypond was almost completely a volunteer effort (like
SuperCollider, for
On May 28, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Hannes Kuhnert wrote:
Tim McNamara schrieb:
Sending money directly to developers instead of to a central Lilypond
account cuts a lot of costs and eliminates much of the need for
organizational bureaucracy (e.g., an accounting department).
On the other hand
On May 28, 2012, at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
As great as Lilypond's output is, there is a long way to go in terms
of simplification and usability (the syntax needs to be simplified
dramatically; a lot of the code users have to write is pretty ugly and
is going to scare off potential
On May 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Tim Slattery wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net
wrote:
I was thinking about simplification like being able to put in a coda with
\coda or a segno with \segno instead of things like
\mark \markup { \musicglyph
On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Louis Guillaume
If I may start with a bit of humble philosophy, when I see a flat
9 especially, I almost always conclude that the tonality will
include a sharp 9 as well, simply because of the dissonance
On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:28 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I actually would write the whole snippet as
autochange =
#(define-music-function (parser location ref music) ((ly:pitch?) ly:music?)
(let ((mus
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
On 30/05/12 02:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
One of the problems of LilyPond is that C++ had very poor support for
things we desperately need: reflection, automatic memory management
and
On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 05/06/12 08:53, David Kastrup wrote:
I would doubt that this would have been the fault of Scheme. More
likely a problem of the Scheme/LilyPond interface choices, but those
choices don't go away when replacing Scheme.
No, it
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Sami sami.ami...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone. I have witnessed a weird behaviour,
You seem to have posted this about ten times in a couple of different ways. It
takes time to let people generate responses.
___
On Jun 7, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Sami wrote:
Normally, \bar |: at the very beginning is redundant and should
be left out. Music with no \bar |: anywhere is always understood
to go back to the beginnining.
Typically yes, true, but it is much better vsually to define both the start
and the
On Jun 10, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
As great as Lilypond's output is, there is a long way to go in terms
of simplification and usability (the syntax needs to be simplified
dramatically; a lot
On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Music notation is complex. Any ASCII representation of
music notation likewise has to be complex.
Hmm, it would be more accurate to say music notation *can* be complex. It
can also be very simple. I use Lilypond for creating jazz lead
On Jun 12, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
Let me respond as a musician rather than as a programmer, because I am the
first and I am not the second. A lot of the syntax of Lilypond makes little
sense except
On Jun 12, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I think that this could simplify the syntax by creating a standard
skeleton for .ly files going from most global to most specific:
\version information
\paper information
\form information (number of bars, repeat locations,
On Jun 17, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
It'd be nice if someone else (i.e., not me) figured out a user-friendly way
for people
to donate money to the Lilypond devs without having
On Jun 24, 2012, at 7:58 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
Hi, lily user:
I use \transpose g d on a melody song. The transpose is fine, but I notice
the chord is not transposed. How to do transpose of chord together with
transpose of melody?
The same way that you do it with the melody, but you
Some weeks back there was some discussion of the Lilypond syntax, I made some
suggestions and was asked to write up a sample .ly file with the ideas I had in
mind. Basically my notion was to separate content (notes and chords) from form
(number of bars, repeats, codas, rehearsal marks, etc.)
Here's a hack to parenthesize chords in \chordmode that was sent to me by a
kind person here on the list. It can't parenthesize a single chord but will do
two or more.
#(define (left-parenthesis-ignatzek-chord-names in-pitches bass inversion
context)
(markup #:line (( (ignatzek-chord-names
On Oct 12, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Fellow Lilyponders:
I recently joined this list serve. Since then I have received not only other
members inquiries but also multiple responses to each of their inquiries.
Is this the usual practice?
Well, yes. The Reply-To
On Oct 12, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:38:13PM -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
Well, yes. The Reply-To header is set so that replies go to the
sender rather than the list, so one must reply all to include
the list which results
On Mar 1, 2013, at 4:47 AM, James Harkins wrote:
Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net writes:
David, thank you so, so much!
Oh, I thought enough bytes had been spilt on this subject already.
IMO, this entire discussion is the result of misreading François's comment.
It's working well
On Mar 8, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Tim Slattery wrote:
Mike Blackstock blackstock.m...@gmail.com wrote:
This paper might be of interest to anyone typesetting public domain
music from so-called copyrighted scores:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244
Excellent article, even
On Mar 9, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
El 04/03/2013 13:18, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com escribió:
In GNU/Linux it is a small nightmare to install. In Windows it is a
matter of next-next-next-done.
I must say it's not so hard in Ubuntu 12.10, all needed libraries
On Mar 10, 2013, at 4:45 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
My last attempt to install it on my Mac to run in an X11 window resulted in
literally hundreds of things being downloaded by MacPorts- dependencies
On Mar 14, 2013, at 5:36 AM, Torsten Hämmerle wrote:
BUT: Even if all this may be quite an ambitious task, I just started off to
see what's possible and how Lilypond behaves in a jazz context. Fortunately,
the results look quite encouraging. :)
This is very intriguing as a jazz player and
On Mar 15, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de wrote:
Hi Torsten,
first of all: This looks just amazing! Thanks for sharing it!
Even though I like LilyPond's original typesetting a lot, I noticed that
sheets get more difficult to read in certain lighting conditions (I
On Mar 15, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Mar 15, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de wrote:
Hi Torsten,
first of all: This looks just amazing! Thanks for sharing it!
Even though I like LilyPond's original typesetting a lot, I noticed that
sheets get more
There are a couple of peculiar side effects. I find that using this turns off
the bar count engraver and it also defeats \improvisationOn resulting in
regular notes instead of parallelogram note heads. The easy workaround is to
use \jazzOff before \improvisationOn. The appearance of the
On Mar 24, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
On 24/03/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
my own work is being funded by LilyPond users who are typically paying
somewhat more to substantially more than the Finale
On Mar 24, 2013, at 11:13 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Marek Klein ma...@gregoriana.sk writes:
Hello,
what about having Donate button which would simply link to
Sponsoring page?
That would probably work. And maybe we should start the Sponsoring
page with a This might not be as easy as
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
I should add that the underlying motivation here is licensing clarity for some
of Urs and Janek's work on useful toolboxes for Lilypond. It's clearly
desirable that these kits be copylefted as far as any
On Mar 29, 2013, at 4:42 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 03/28/2013 08:28 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
My understanding is always been that the GPL applies to the software used to
produce a file, not to the file itself.
I think (at least in this case) you mean process, not produce.
I
On Apr 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 04/02/2013 07:33 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
If I do not copy the actual file into my .ly file but only have the \include
statement, I have not violated copyright. It would be up to any subsequent
user to obtain the copyrighted Bob
On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 04/02/2013 11:57 PM, Anthonys Lists wrote:
On 02/04/2013 22:47, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Indeed, and a consequence of distributing a covered work under
GPL-incompatible terms is that you lose
On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 04/02/2013 11:38 PM, Anthonys Lists wrote:
On 02/04/2013 22:01, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
(Function names and APIs are generally considered to be uncopyrightable.)
However, I think the consensus
On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 04/03/2013 01:45 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
Is that in fact correct? The quibbles here is what constitutes derivation.
If you write a program that calls a library during its function
I almost never use open strings even with first position chords when playing
jazz. There are a few Jim Hall-ish situations that are exceptions to this.
On Apr 22, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Peter Crighton petecrigh...@googlemail.com wrote:
2013/4/22 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2013/4/22 David
On Apr 26, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Sarah k Alawami wrote:
Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in
lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's
the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so is there a way to
comprehend
On Apr 29, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote:
Hello:
In the following, I want to place a slur from the bes16 across the bar to the
aes8.
\version 2.16.2
{ \key des \major
\time 4/4
bes2-3 a4~ a8. bes16 |
aes8. bes16 ( aes16. ) bes32 (
On May 12, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. in braille music, I see the word pizz and i know until I see arco I
have to pluc the string. In lily pond I don't want to put \pizz over every
single note especially since with the \repeat volta 2 {music} I want to
Struggling through with installing this on a Mac, how the heck does one get
Poppler to work? Jeez, after installing nearly a GB of dependencies,
everything seems to work but Poppler.
Qt libraries (qt-mac-opensource-4.8.4.dmg)
Python 2.7.4 for OS X 10.6
sip-4.14.6 (which seems to be part of the
LilyPond automatically moves the coda glyph
\mark \markup { \musicglyph #scripts.coda }
to the beginning of the next line, if it is put at the end of a line with a
manual \break. This is highly annoying. How does one stop it from happening?
On May 17, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Jim Long wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:45:55AM -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
LilyPond automatically moves the coda glyph
\mark \markup { \musicglyph #scripts.coda }
to the beginning of the next line, if it is put at the end of a
line with a manual
Ties and slurs cross bar lines automatically. I have never seen LilyPnd behave
differently in that regard; ties and slurs that cross \repeat volta into a
second or greater \alternative need a specific cue to happen correctly
(\repeatTie IIRC).
IMHO beams should never cross bar lines- it looks
On May 28, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Kevin Barry wrote:
Dear LilyPond users,
A friend recently persuaded me to try emacs for text editing (LaTeX +
LilyPond), however I can't quite understand the instructions for installing
lilypond-mode, as outlined here:
On Jun 1, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Janek,
This is great!
Thanks,
Kieren.
p.s.
LilyPonderings
That one gets my vote.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On May 27, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Paul Morris wrote:
flup2 wrote
I don't install it like a Unix program. I just expand the archive in the
Applications folder. That way, the path to frescobaldi binary looks like:
/Applications/frescobaldi/frescobaldi (the first frescobaldi is the
folder name, the
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Greetings,
On 6/06/13 10:13 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
Installing Frescobaldi remains one of the singularly frustrating interludes
of my computing life. I cannot figure out how anyone gets a damned thing
done using Linux/BSD with all
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:59 PM, flup2 wrote:
Hello,
While reading your error message, it seems that the python version used is
the one included in OS X (/Library/Frameworks...), not the one installed by
macports (/opt/local...)
To be sure that the problem lies there, here are a few steps:
On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Yes, but Mac OS X Darwin does not use apt as far as I know, only Debian and
Debian derived systems such as Ubuntu and Mint.
As a result of this thread, I have decided the need is there for a macports
bundle for frescobaldi, one that
:10 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Jun 25, 2013, at 1:29 AM, Philippe de Rochambeau wrote:
In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to:
- prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run
You don't have to double click LilyPond. In fact it is not really meant
On Jun 27, 2013, at 6:51 AM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
on 2013-06-27 at 11:56 Alexander Deubelbeiss wrote:
From: Philippe de Rochambeau phi...@free.fr
could someone please explain how to run Lilypond from Fraise?
In my experience Lilypond does not interact usefully
I use my iPad with unRealBook to organize lead sheets produced by LilyPond for
all my gigs. With the Retina display it works fine for lead sheets but might
be too small for orchestral or even piano music. Rumor has it that Apple is
planning a 13 iPad, but then rumor has all sorts of things
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing a
Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all its related
tools for my everyday work.
So for me using
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:22 AM, Christian Andersson
christian.ld.anders...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue with running Frescobaldi on MacOS X must be one of the most
long-running among threads of this list. Why can't some of you Mac users
please take your responsibility for the community, and see
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:40 AM, Davide Liessi davide.lie...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/16 Christian Andersson christian.ld.anders...@gmail.com:
This issue with running Frescobaldi on MacOS X must be one of the most
long-running among threads of this list. Why can't some of you Mac users
please take
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Derek Klinge schilke...@gmail.com wrote:
For the life of me I cannot figure this out.
I would like the following example to explicitly include the 7. Is there a
way to change the way it handles half diminished 7ths?
EXAMPLE
\chords {
c4:7.9- c:7.9-/g
I think posting announcements to some of the rec.music.makers.* Usenet groups
would make sense, as well as other fora for musicians (especially jazz
musicians since they are likely to be interested in the chord-scale
relationship more than a lot of other musical styles). I'll scatter a few
On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:14 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Patrick or Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com writes:
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
To: Patrick or Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com
[deleting billions of lines]
From: James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com
Patrick or
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch wrote:
Building python-poppler-qt4-0.16.3 fails on Mac OS X 10.8.4, though, you'll
find the trace below.
The choice of Poppler is highly problematic on the Mac for some reason. I
wonder if it is possible to rejigger this to
On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Steve Noland st...@thenolands.us wrote:
I am trying to typeset a score for jazz orchestra. I am having problems with
some of the jazz chordnames engraving correctly. Specifically, a Dm7(b5)
chord (D minor 7, flat 5) engraves as a Dº, or D diminished. What
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
\override ChordName #'font-name = #lilyjazzchord
Hi Jim,
On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:54 AM, Jean-Alexis Montignies j...@montignies.info
wrote:
Warning!
Don’t try to do update on Mavericks (MacOS 10.9) as QT is currently not
compiling.
If installed before upgrading to 10.9, Frescobaldi continues to work.
Thanks for the heads-up.
It may be
' f'2 |
\override NoteHead #'style = #'slash
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
bf'4 bf'4 bf'4 bf'4 |
\revert NoteHead #'style
\revert Stem #'transparent
}
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 06:58:26AM +, David Bobroff wrote:
On 3/3/2011 6:23 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
I have not been able
On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:58 AM, David Bobroff wrote:
On 3/3/2011 6:23 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
I have not been able to locate a way to do jazz style multiple bar repeats
like these for writing out chord progressions for solos. Can anyone point
me to the place in the documentation (assuming
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Colin Hall wrote:
For the record I've attached a complete source file to demonstrate how I do
chop marks.
I like how those render and will have other uses for them. Thanks!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Robin Bannister wrote:
Tim McNamara wrote:
There is a number in the middle of the bar which indicates how many bars to
repeat, with a heavy horizontal bar on either side of the number.
Would this do the sort of thing you're looking for? You ask for a
multi
marks. You can replace the r4 with an appropriate rest for other durations.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Colin Hall wrote:
For the record I've attached a complete source file to demonstrate how I do
chop marks
On Mar 13, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2011-03-13 um 00:51 schrieb Bernardo Barros:
2011/3/12 Henning Hraban Ramm hra...@fiee.net:
MacPorts is a project independent from Apple, but uses the compiler etc
installed with Xcode.
What you can download and install from
Without actual music we can't compile your score to see the problem.
I think your problem may be in that you have two \paper blocks and your indent
is wrong if you really don't want the first staff indented. Try consolidating
your paper block and changing the indent:
\paper {
My first thought is that it's the 21st century and you don't need an
uncooperative music publisher any more. Especially one using software that
results in mediocre looking engraved music.
On Mar 31, 2011, at 4:07 AM, Frauke Jurgensen wrote:
Good question. I suspect I will be having a
Has the cause of the problem been identified? Is some part of Lilypond out of
compliance with an Apple API or did Apple's update screw something up? I guess
my question is whether the onus of fixing the problem is on Apple or Lilypond.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4472
On Apr 5, 2011, at
On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
A few notes about Critical problems:
- bad output, or even being completely unusable, on operating
systems released in 2010 or 2011, do *not count*.
Errr... huh? Given that most users are going to be
On Apr 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, PMA wrote:
My thanks to all for your suggestions!
The upshot -- well, so far -- is that *if* I buy the printer, it will be a
refurbished HP LaserJet 5000. Am sniffing out reputable vendors.
Meanwhile, I've begun to explore other (no-printer) options for
On Apr 17, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Mike Blackstock wrote:
I'm helping a friend install on Mac OS X 10.6.6 but I know nothing about the
Mac. I found this in the archive:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-03/msg00246.html
Is that the right approach for her?
No. That's not
This may fix the issues with Lilypond and 10.6.7; I haven't tested it yet.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4605
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hello fellow pond-dwellers,
I'd like to print chords like c/e as chord names with E as a small index
to C or even stacked with a small E below a normal-sized C, without the
slash.
How can I achieve that? I didn't find anything
On Jun 26, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2011-06-24 um 19:21 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
Perhaps I misunderstand the slash-notation (inversion): I use it to
define the bass string to pick on the guitar.
That's the way I use it as well. But I'm totally familiar with this
On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:59 PM, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 07:11:37 PM Tim McNamara wrote:
On Jun 26, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
That's the way I use it as well. But I'm totally familiar with
this being C/E. That's the only layout I've ever seen
You can check on this by using the Activity Monitor (in the Finder, Go menu
Utilities Activity Monitor). If you sort alphabetically you can easily find
Lilypond and see whether it is demanding a lot of CPU cycles, hogging memory
and/or spawning a lot of subprocesses that are slowing things
On Jul 19, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Marc Mouries wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
Marc-
I traced the problem to improperly set permissions for the binary executable
LilyEditor in
LilyEditor.app Contents MacOS LilyEditor. Your application
By default Lilypond moves a coda placed at the end of a line to the beginning
of the next line of \break is used. I consider this bad behavior- the
rehearsal marks should stay put where I place them rather than having that
placement changed by the application (I have no idea why Lilypond is
On Aug 6, 2011, at 11:30 AM, James Lowe wrote:
Hello,
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Tim
McNamara [tim...@bitstream.net]
Sent: 06 August 2011 17:17
On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:02 AM, James Lowe wrote:
Well don't reply to me directly when they come from the lists then!
The way the list is set up increases the likelihood that replies will go to
individuals rather than to the list. This has been discussed before and there
was vehement
On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
(I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did
send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...)
I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started
this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate, but
On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I am very surprised that so many of the LilyPond users are composers!
I was quite sure that Lily is mostly suited for engravers and editors.
I write songs (jazz) but would not consider myself a composer as such. Just
once in
Reinhold, that is absolutely outstanding. So many options with the great
preview, a couple of which are perfect for my needs. Thank you!
Tim
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Look for the pop-chords.ly file which has a lot of these modifications already.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Nov 9, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
Hi Jim everyone,
I'm currently preparing a macro file jazz-chords.ily which contains (my
version of) common jazz chord notation. I will share that file as soon as it
is in a usable state.
However, right now, I just worked out how to
On Nov 11, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
Hello,
How could i show chords without suffixes. I found this line in
scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm
(ignatzek-format-chord-name
root prefixes main-name alterations add-steps suffixes bass-note
On Nov 15, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
Hi,
No this isn't what i wanted..I wouldent be asking if there were a anwser
online..:)
What i wanted is:
\chordmode {
c1:7
a1:min
d1:min
g1:sus4 }
That will give me:
CA D G
Thank you..
On Dec 1, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Daniel Kraft wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/01/11 16:22, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Le Dec 1, 2011 à 4:05 PM, Tim McNamara a écrit :
On Dec 1, 2011, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Kraft wrote:
I have the following problem: I would like
On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Peter Jaques wrote:
Thanks Hans. You didn't quite understand my question, I think.
I understand that I *can* put files practically anywhere. The problem is that
I then have to use a really long include line like:
\include /Users/peter/Documents/asdf.ly
I
On Dec 7, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Peter Jaques wrote:
Thanks Hans. You didn't quite understand my question, I think.
I understand that I *can* put files practically anywhere. The problem is
that I then have to use a really long include line
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:25 PM, James wrote:
Alberto
2011/12/20 Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt:
On 12/20/11 18:59 , Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:13:42PM +, Alberto Simões wrote:
As a suggestion, please delete the web page that answers to:
Sometimes it happens that a non-programer user reports some issue or makes some
request and gets metaphorically punched by a developer. This occurs in all
open-source projects. Some developers are much tetchier than the Lilypond
developers (such as the GNU Emacs developers. Whoa. Their
101 - 200 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
