Re: cadenza when having multiple staffs

2018-09-05 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Actually, it didn't take me long to test it. It's spot on. Thanks! Will let you know when I upload it into its repo. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:18 PM Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know > how it went. > On Wed, Sep 5

Re: cadenza when having multiple staffs

2018-09-05 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know how it went. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:01 AM Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > My thoughts exactly. > > Andrew > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 15:55, Aaron Hill wrote: >> >> >> It is not a cadenza, per se, but rather an

cadenza when having multiple staffs

2018-09-04 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Hi! I'm translating Carmen Fantasy by Francois Borne into Lilypond. I'm writing the score with flute/piano parts and when reaching 2 bars before Moderato, the flute part has what I think is a cadenza while the piano part has perfect measures to complete it (rest with fermata). I tried writing

Re: How to write this note from chaconne?

2018-03-07 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Rules that have evolved in the course of the 19th and 20th century and are > certainly alien to the 18th. I understand that the rules had changed over time and that back then it was fine to do it that way. > If

Re: How to write this note from chaconne?

2018-03-07 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:01 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > There is no reason whatsoever for any fancy words. It’s just a dotted note > with the dot written at the rhythmic position where it actually happens. > I’ve never seen any realisation of this in LilyPond – would be

How to write this note from chaconne?

2018-03-07 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Hi! You know the chaconne from BWV 1004, right? On the bar before last, there's an apparent dot written at the position of the f at the opening of the bar. I didn't know if it was a staccato mark or other kind of expressive mark for the violin or a mistake but I also found it on Anna Magdalena'

Re: How to organize a single piece of work with different versions?

2018-02-14 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
V 1030 Flute Sonata B minor/1-andante-flute.ly @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -% Sonata for Flute and Harpsichord BWV 1030 in B minor I Andante +% Sonata for Flute and Haprsichord BWV 1030 in B minor I Andante %{ Copyright 2017 Edmundo Carmona Antoranz. Released under CC 4.0 by-sa @@ -47,23 +47,23 @@ %

Re: How to organize a single piece of work with different versions?

2018-02-14 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Edmundo, > > Did the B minor for my senior recital! Bravo. > Note, I compile Andante, time and key signature should be moved to after > \relative c', i.e., within the {}. > Consider using R1 for the full

How to organize a single piece of work with different versions?

2018-02-10 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Hi! As you might have noticed from previous mails I have sent, I'm working on a project to process works from Bach on lilypond. I have already put up BWV 1013 and 1030 (I dare you to guess the instrument that I play). However, each one of them has many different editions. Right now I have set up

Re: Re: how to write a single note that covers two sounds

2018-01-25 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Glad I could help. > > Please keep communication on-list whenever possible, so others may chime in > or see results or whether the question is sufficiently answered. > > Best, Simon > Oh, sorry you are right.

how to write a single note that covers two sounds

2018-01-25 Thread Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
Hi! Suppose you were transcribing Bach's flute partita BWV 1013 from manuscript. On the Bourree, on bar 48 there's a note that was corrected on the manuscript but, if you ask me, it's kind of difficult to see what Bach's final intent was. Was it a F that got corrected to G or viceversa? So if