Hi Urs,
I have some programming experience, but no understanding of schemes at all.
And I've been using Lilypond for the last 3 years or so.
If you think I could help as someone who would use your book to learn scheme
programming for Lilypond, I would be very happy to help.
Thanks,
Zoran
--
Malte Meyn-3 wrote
> Am 09.03.2016 um 05:13 schrieb zzk:
>> Out of curiosity (and maybe for some possible future, more complicated
>> scenarios), is there a solution using \scaleDurations instead?
>>
>
> A tuplet 7/6 without tuplet number is the same as \scaleD
Hi Kieren,
Why? Because such a simple, elegant solution simply did not occur to me :)
Thanks a lot, works very well.
Out of curiosity (and maybe for some possible future, more complicated
scenarios), is there a solution using \scaleDurations instead?
Thanks,
Zoran
--
View this message in
Hi lilyponders,
Please consider the following code which is supposed to match the attached
excerpt from Debussy's 'Images'.
I am getting a bar check warning, as I am having a bit of a struggle with
fitting seven 32nd notes under the second 'quarter' note in the tuplet.
Any help would be highly
Wilbert Berendsen-2 wrote
> I yeserday released Frescobaldi 2.18.2, a maintenance release
> containing bug fixes, small improvements and translation updates.
Thank you so much for your work on Frescobaldi, Wilfred.
Wishing you all the best in 2016.
ZK
--
View this message in context:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote
> Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I
> took
> a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace
> mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use
> them macros.
>
> I rather prefer
1+ for Sublime Text. I am very happy with a Sublime Text / Frescobaldi combo.
One of my favorite features with Sublime Text is multiple selections. It is
a time saver when it comes to selecting and changing the name for a number
of note, variable, or function instances.
Zoran
--
View this
Happy to donate. Just need to know how :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/My-finances-for-working-on-LilyPond-tp182552p182631.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user
Here I come, 50's :)
Instruments: keyboards and acoustic guitar.
Started using Lilypond in combination with Sublime Text 2 in 2013 to typeset
my own music, after getting frustrated with Sibelius. I have learned about
Lilypond through Steinberg's blog on their new notation software.
Currently
Hi Klaus,
Klaus Blum wrote
> Hi Zoran,
>
> this is how I would start:
>
> %
> --
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new RhythmicStaff
> \with {
> %\accepts "TextScript"
> \override
simon.albrecht wrote
> Hi Zoran,
>
> Am 09.09.2015 um 12:14 schrieb zzk:
>> Hi ponders,
>>
>> I was wondering if it is possible to hide staff lines between the very
>> start
>> of the line and the point where the notation starts. In other words, no
>>
Hi Kieren
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> Not sure why you’d want to… but “With Lilypond, all things are possible.”
> =)
That is why I love Lilypond :)
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> Here’s one solution:
>
> \layout { indent = 1\in ragged-right = ##t }
>
> \relative c' {
> \omit Staff.SystemStartBar
Hi ponders,
I was wondering if it is possible to hide staff lines between the very start
of the line and the point where the notation starts. In other words, no
lines over the clef, key signature and time signature. Hopefully the
attached image demonstrates what I mean.
I am sure I saw a
Hi Kieren,
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> Then why not simply have the music “as is” and adjust the beginning of the
> first measure (or spanner) in the TimeLine context instead?
> I think that would be a lot simpler, especially as the number of other
> simultaneous contexts increases.
As I am
14 matches
Mail list logo
