good to know, thanks.
On 15 April 2018 at 13:06, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 15. April 2018 13:47:43 MESZ schrieb Simon Albrecht <
> simon.albre...@mail.de>:
> >On 15.04.2018 13:25, Robert Hickman wrote:
> >> |Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of
> >> the user code?|
Am 15. April 2018 13:47:43 MESZ schrieb Simon Albrecht :
>On 15.04.2018 13:25, Robert Hickman wrote:
>> |Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of
>> the user code?|
>
>\include does exactly that: read the contents of the included file
>verbatim.
That means: yes, you c
On 15.04.2018 13:25, Robert Hickman wrote:
|Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of
the user code?|
\include does exactly that: read the contents of the included file verbatim.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
l
Thanks, -dsafe looks like the simplest to use but 'In addition, safe mode
disallows \include' which I need to use the symbol file. Is it sufficient
to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of the user code?
On 15 April 2018 at 11:45, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.04.2018 um 12:41 schrieb
Am 15.04.2018 um 12:41 schrieb Robert Hickman:
Second thought: (see my previous, sorry about double posting).
What are the risks of integrating lillypond into a CMS from a security
perspective, does it allow you to run shell commands for instance? I
will not be exposing this publicly, just t
