Re: LilyPond in a CMS [was: Re: Defining custom symbols]

2018-04-15 Thread Robert Hickman
good to know, thanks. On 15 April 2018 at 13:06, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 15. April 2018 13:47:43 MESZ schrieb Simon Albrecht < > simon.albre...@mail.de>: > >On 15.04.2018 13:25, Robert Hickman wrote: > >> |Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of > >> the user code?|

Re: LilyPond in a CMS [was: Re: Defining custom symbols]

2018-04-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15. April 2018 13:47:43 MESZ schrieb Simon Albrecht : >On 15.04.2018 13:25, Robert Hickman wrote: >> |Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of >> the user code?| > >\include does exactly that: read the contents of the included file >verbatim. That means: yes, you c

Re: LilyPond in a CMS [was: Re: Defining custom symbols]

2018-04-15 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 15.04.2018 13:25, Robert Hickman wrote: |Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of the user code?| \include does exactly that: read the contents of the included file verbatim. Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list l

Re: LilyPond in a CMS [was: Re: Defining custom symbols]

2018-04-15 Thread Robert Hickman
Thanks, -dsafe looks like the simplest to use but 'In addition, safe mode disallows \include' which I need to use the symbol file. Is it sufficient to concatenate the symbol file at the beginning of the user code? On 15 April 2018 at 11:45, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 15.04.2018 um 12:41 schrieb

LilyPond in a CMS [was: Re: Defining custom symbols]

2018-04-15 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 15.04.2018 um 12:41 schrieb Robert Hickman: Second thought: (see my previous, sorry about double posting). What are the risks of integrating lillypond into a CMS from a security perspective, does it allow you to run shell commands for instance? I will not be exposing this publicly, just t