Re: \fine and \section across staves

2022-11-03 Thread Joel C. Salomon
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 1:41 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 03/11/2022 à 18:12, Joel C. Salomon a écrit : > > > > I normally put commands like `\bar "||"` in a single place (a Dynamics > > section, usually) and they take effect across all staves. And in > > fact, replacing `\section` with `\bar

Re: \fine and \section across staves

2022-11-03 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 03/11/2022 à 21:02, anthony a écrit : On 03/11/2022 17:41, Jean Abou Samra wrote: In general, it's always been a credo through repeat-related changes that the repeat structure in the user input is expected to match across staves, reflecting the actual music. If you do this, it will also be

Re: \fine and \section across staves

2022-11-03 Thread anthony
On 03/11/2022 17:41, Jean Abou Samra wrote: In general, it's always been a credo through repeat-related changes that the repeat structure in the user input is expected to match across staves, reflecting the actual music. If you do this, it will also be easier to extract parts. Like bar line

Re: \fine and \section across staves

2022-11-03 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 03/11/2022 à 18:12, Joel C. Salomon a écrit : There’s a change between 2.23.6 and 2.23.80 in how `\fine` and `\section` appear across staves.  Below is a near-minimal cut-down version of my score illustrating the change, and images showing the difference. I normally put commands like

\fine and \section across staves

2022-11-03 Thread Joel C. Salomon
There’s a change between 2.23.6 and 2.23.80 in how `\fine` and `\section` appear across staves. Below is a near-minimal cut-down version of my score illustrating the change, and images showing the difference. I normally put commands like `\bar "||"` in a single place (a Dynamic