Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-04 Thread Johan Vromans
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes: Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename. Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later. A pity tiger.ly does not work $ rm -f align.ps $ touch align.ps $ ps2pdf align.ps $ gs align.ps #

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-02 Thread David Kastrup
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes: David Kastrup writes: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Nice. How did you come by this one? Accidentally. The weird thing is that I then tried

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-02 Thread Francisco Vila
2013/11/2 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes: David Kastrup writes: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Nice. How did you come by this one? Accidentally.

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-02 Thread David Kastrup
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes: Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename. Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later. A pity tiger.ly does not work I was actually looking for the tiger, but it seems that it is no longer being

And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? \markup \center-align { hoi hoo } -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? Is the surprising output related to this? If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? Is the surprising output related to this? If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in LilyPond's

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-) Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Carl Peterson
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? Is the surprising output related to this? If an

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote: On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-) I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?) Best Peter

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread David Kastrup
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote: On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-) I guess it must be related to the creation of the

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 11/01/2013 09:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Ok! At first I thought it was an easter egg, but so close to Halloween it must be a bug! Best Peter

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
David Kastrup writes: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Nice. How did you come by this one? Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT

Re: And now for something completely different.

2013-11-01 Thread Noeck
For me, it does not occur with 2.17 versions (.9 and .26) but only with 2.16.2. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user