Re: Beaming question

2022-11-29 Thread Molly Preston
Thank you! Both these examples helped! I ended up using the \beatstructure because I realized I had to do it for the whole measure. -Molly On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 2:09 PM James.Correa wrote: > > I think this is what you are looking for: > > \version "2.22.2" > > \score { > \absolute { > >

Re: Beaming question

2022-11-28 Thread James.Correa
I think this is what you are looking for: \version "2.22.2" \score { \absolute { \tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 [ c'' \once \set stemRightBeamCount = #1 f'' } \once \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1 c'' f'' ) ] | %m67 } } --- James Correa Composer - guitarist - sound designer http://www.jamescorrea.net

Re: Beaming question

2022-11-27 Thread Martín Rincón Botero
Hi Molly, you can subdivide beams. F. ex.: \score { \absolute { \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8) \set beatStructure = 2,2,2,2 \tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 c''f'' } c''f''

Beaming question

2022-11-27 Thread Molly Preston
I am working with a texture of triplet 16ths that occasionally are duple 16ths. I am wondering if there is a way to turn the beam into a single beam between the second f'' in the triplet to the c'' in the below example. I'm not sure what that's called and couldn't find it in the notation manual.

proper beaming question

2015-12-05 Thread Karol Majewski
By default, LilyPond's beaming of eight rest and three eight notes in 4/4 meter is: r8 c'8[ c'8 c'8] E. Gould on p. 164 states that: Rhythmic figures that are not part of a repeated pattern may be best beamed into separate beats, so that they are not mistaken for triplets nor fot groups of

Re: proper beaming question

2015-12-05 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hello Karol, well, NR 1.2.4 discusses (in the paragraph starting with ‘In engraving from…’) this very topic, but only for ‘time signatures with 3 in the numerator’. I think this is much a matter of style, and thus I, as a notorious traditionalist, would prefer the 19th century version. But I

Re: beaming question

2015-06-19 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 20.06.2015 um 04:04 schrieb William Zeitler: I want to do like the attached gif: notice the broken 16th note beams. Please do not introduce a new topic by answering to an existing thread, this causes confusion. (More in the score dictates that this needs to be 6/8. Meanwhile the general

beaming question

2015-06-19 Thread William Zeitler
I want to do like the attached gif: notice the broken 16th note beams. (More in the score dictates that this needs to be 6/8. Meanwhile the general question of how to do this kind of beaming still stands.) Here's my snippet -- I can't figure out from the docs how to make Lilypond look like my

Beaming question

2013-07-10 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, I need to achieve a beaming as in the attached png, i.e. beams over rests with only one beam throughout the time. a) Is it really true that I have to do that manually in the way I did it in the attached file? b) If yes, is this a deficit in LilyPond or an indication that this isn't

Re: Beaming question

2013-07-10 Thread Nick Payne
On 10/07/13 19:03, Urs Liska wrote: Hi, I need to achieve a beaming as in the attached png, i.e. beams over rests with only one beam throughout the time. a) Is it really true that I have to do that manually in the way I did it in the attached file? This works: \version 2.17.21 { \set

Re: Beaming question

2013-07-10 Thread Urs Liska
Am 10.07.2013 13:52, schrieb Nick Payne: On 10/07/13 19:03, Urs Liska wrote: Hi, I need to achieve a beaming as in the attached png, i.e. beams over rests with only one beam throughout the time. a) Is it really true that I have to do that manually in the way I did it in the attached file?

Re: Beaming question

2013-07-10 Thread Urs Liska
Am 10.07.2013 13:55, schrieb Urs Liska: Am 10.07.2013 13:52, schrieb Nick Payne: This works: \version 2.17.21 { \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 16) a'16[ r r a'] \stopStaff s2 \startStaff a'32[ r r a'] } Thank you. Of course I thought about

Re: Beaming question

2008-02-14 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Unfortunately, this isn't possible with the current autobeaming mechanism, which only looks at one note at a time and checks if it's on a beat where the beam should be started or ended. To do what you want, it would have to also look at future notes to decide on the beam break. Of course, if you

Re: Beaming question

2008-02-14 Thread Andrew Black
Steve Dunlop wrote: 4/4 time. Lilypond 2.11.33. I'm trying to get the autobeaming behavior to match an existing style I have read and re-read the autobeaming description and find it too complex. I want to beam quavers and semiquavers so that they always stop on a crotchet beat. Ie a8

RE: Beaming question

2008-02-14 Thread Trevor Daniels
and 4 which happens by default. HTH Trevor D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Black Sent: 14 February 2008 13:03 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Beaming question Steve Dunlop

Beaming question

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Dunlop
4/4 time. Lilypond 2.11.33. I'm trying to get the autobeaming behavior to match an existing style where: * Up to four eighth notes can be beamed together (subject to the usual limitations on ending beat) * But, when sixteen notes share the beam with eighth notes, beams may not cross beats.

Another upgrade/beaming question

2007-08-02 Thread Tim Sawyer
Folks, In4/4 time, \times 4/6 { sn16 sn sn sn sn sn } creates a six, with six notes, semiquaver lines joining them together. Perfect. However, \times 4/6 { sn8 sn16 sn sn sn } in lilypond 2.6, produced a quaver joined to a group of four semiquavers, whilst in 2.10 I get a quaver, a

RE: Beaming question

2006-06-27 Thread Fairchild
Subject: Re: Beaming question I don't know, if it's a feature or a bug, but at least it should be possible to override it, which I couldn't manage to do. The following example illustrates the same phenomenon. As far as I can see, subdivideBeams should be set to false by default. \version 2.8.0

Re: Beaming question

2006-06-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
There have recently been some bugs with the beaming in the development versions. I really recommend you to use the latest stable version 2.8.x for any serious typesetting. Also, if you use the development version, please report bugs at bug-lilypond@gnu.org (but first check the archives to avoid

Re: Beaming question

2006-06-22 Thread Thomas Scharkowski
With and 2.8.5 2.9.10 I get exactly the same result, so perhaps it's not a bug, but a mistake of mine? Is the code correct for the desired result? Thanks, Thomas There have recently been some bugs with the beaming in the development versions. I really recommend you to use the latest stable

Re: Beaming question

2006-06-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I don't know, if it's a feature or a bug, but at least it should be possible to override it, which I couldn't manage to do. The following example illustrates the same phenomenon. As far as I can see, subdivideBeams should be set to false by default. \version 2.8.0 \relative c'' { c16 [ b a g b

Beaming question

2006-06-20 Thread Thomas Scharkowski
For a long cadenza passage I want to beam all notes together, but do not succeed: there is the a subdivision before last 16th note, and this note has a small beam in the wrong direction. code: -- \version 2.9.9 #(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f) \score { \relative c'' { \key

Auto beaming question

2006-02-06 Thread Benjamin Esham
Hello all, I'm trying to typeset a piece (it's the Allemanda from Bach's second violin partita, BWV 1004, in case you care). I'm having a little bit of trouble configuring the auto beaming to do exactly what I want. There are basically three rhythmic units present in the piece (which

Re: Auto beaming question

2006-02-06 Thread Joe Neeman
- groups of sixteenth and thirty-second notes. These should also be beamed per beat, e.g. three sixteenths and two thirty-seconds. #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 1 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 2 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 3

Re: Auto beaming question

2006-02-06 Thread Benjamin Esham
On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: Benjamin Esham wrote: - groups of sixteenth and thirty-second notes. These should also be beamed per beat, e.g. three sixteenths and two thirty-seconds. #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 32 * *) 1 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting

Re: auto-beaming question

2005-08-23 Thread Joe Neeman
\version 2.6.3 \score { \new Staff { \relative c'{ \key g \major \clef violin \time 2/4 #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) c16. c32 c8 c4 %Bar 1 c8 c16. c32 c4 %Bar 2 }}} The result can be seen here:

Re: auto-beaming question

2005-08-23 Thread Gauvain Pocentek
Joe Neeman wrote: The reason is because of these 2 lines in /usr/share/lilypond/2.6.X/scm/auto-beam.scm (or whereever you have installed lilypond): ((end 1 32 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 1 8)) ((end 1 32 2 4) . ,(ly:make-moment 3 8)) That is, lilypond has a built-in beam setting that breaks a

auto-beaming question

2005-08-22 Thread Gauvain Pocentek
Hello, I'm typesetting a piece with a lot of rhythms like: es16.[ es32 d16. c32] and I'd like beaming to be automatically set as in the above exemple, without using []. I've tried many things like: #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4 ) or \set beatLength =

Re: auto-beaming question

2005-08-22 Thread Gauvain Pocentek
Graham Percival wrote: If you haven't already, try reading section 8.6.2 from the documentation for 2.7. The docs have been (hopefully) clarified, and it will all apply to 2.6 as well. Done. The documentation seems clear to me, but there's something I don't understand. Here is a short

another automatic beaming question

2004-09-03 Thread Russ Ross
As I indicated in a previous message, I'm using a script to give me shortcuts for \melisma and \melismaEnd that also turn on automatic beaming during the melisma. This uncovered a bug where \autoBeamOff doesn't take effect until after the current group of beamed notes finishes, so something like:

beaming question in 2.1.26 and 2.1.27

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Scott
Why are these two notes beamed in 2/2 time and not in 4/4? I don't think they should be *automatically* beamed ever. TIA, Paul Scott \version 2.1.27 i = \notes { r2 r8. c'16 b8-. r } \score { \new Staff \notes { \time 2/2 \i \time 4/4 \i } } beamtesta.pdf Description: