On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:21 PM David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
> >
> > although it does the job I still wonder if the "tweak" (?) method
> suggested by Mark can work too, so to have multiple shape commands
> together, instead of a shapeColumn.
> >
> > Best,
> > Paolo
>
> Won't work, hence the elaborate
Hi Paolo,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:56 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> In order to get at individual ties in a chord, you have to resort to
>> desperate measures. Use the code here:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg47432/shape-tie-columns.ly
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>
>
> In order to get at individual ties in a chord, you have to resort to
> desperate measures. Use the code here:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg47432/shape-tie-columns.ly
>
> Hope this helps,
> David
>
Thank you David,
although it does the job I still wonder if
Hi Paolo,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 9:45 AM Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Please consider this (tested on 2.19.84):
>
> \new Voice <<
> { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (3 . 0)) Tie c' ~ c' }
> { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) Tie c'' ~ c'' }
> >>
>
> If I modify the shape
>
> I haven't seen this construction before ( \new Voice << { } { } >>).
> You should either have two separate Voices or put a "\\" in between
> the two music expressions, so that lilypond will split it into two
> voices.
Sorry but I can't figure what is the *right* expression for solving the
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 19:14, Paolo Prete wrote:
>> > Please consider this (tested on 2.19.84):
>> >
>> > \new Voice <<
>> > { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (3 . 0)) Tie c' ~ c' }
>> > { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) Tie c'' ~ c'' }
>> >>>
I haven't seen this construction
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:20 PM Mark Knoop wrote:
> At 14:44 on 25 Mar 2020, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Please consider this (tested on 2.19.84):
> >
> > \new Voice <<
> > { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (3 . 0)) Tie c' ~ c' }
> > { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
At 14:44 on 25 Mar 2020, Paolo Prete wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Please consider this (tested on 2.19.84):
>
> \new Voice <<
> { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (3 . 0)) Tie c' ~ c' }
> { \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) Tie c'' ~ c'' }
>>>
>
> If I modify the shape on the first tie,
Hello.
Please consider this (tested on 2.19.84):
\new Voice <<
{ \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (3 . 0)) Tie c' ~ c' }
{ \shape #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) Tie c'' ~ c'' }
>>
If I modify the shape on the first tie, changes are applied on the second
tie. Is this a bug? If so, is
