On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:26 AM Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> Hi Knute,
>
> Have you had any luck so far? After I read your original email I looked at
> what Gould had to say, and looked through a Henle edition of Beethoven
> piano sonatas. The Henle slurs all looked good (or at least not wrong), but
Hi Knute,
Have you had any luck so far? After I read your original email I looked at
what Gould had to say, and looked through a Henle edition of Beethoven
piano sonatas. The Henle slurs all looked good (or at least not wrong), but
placement looks like more of an art than a science when a slur is
>> I've solved it differently, see
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2103
>>
>> 'All layout objects' is better suited as a reference than 'Graphical
>> Object Interfaces' IMHO.
>
> Why? In this instance, you can see that you need to look into
> slur-interface, not
Le dimanche 10 septembre 2023 à 08:24 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> I've solved it differently, see
>
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2103
>
> 'All layout objects' is better suited as a reference than 'Graphical
> Object Interfaces' IMHO.
Why? In this instance,
>>> I have a feeling that I could do a lot with the Slur.details
>>> alist, but the function of the symbol/value pairs is not always
>>> clear. Is there documentation on these?
>>
>>
>> Each details value is documented on
>>
>>
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 7:13 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 septembre 2023 à 17:42 -0700, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a piece I'm engraving where the automatic (default) slur shapes
> are not
> > that good. See first attachment for my piece with no \shape
Le jeudi 07 septembre 2023 à 17:42 -0700, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> I have a piece I'm engraving where the automatic (default) slur shapes are not
> that good. See first attachment for my piece with no \shape commands, and the
> second attachment is more how I would like the slur
Thanks for catching that.
--
Knute Snortum
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 12:14 PM Roland Goretzki
wrote:
> Hello Knute,
>
> sorry, I can't help achieve good results at slurs, but I probably
> regarded a little typo at your example "bad-slurs.png":
>
> As far as I know, it's not "Alegro", but
Hello Knute,
sorry, I can't help achieve good results at slurs, but I probably
regarded a little typo at your example "bad-slurs.png":
As far as I know, it's not "Alegro", but "Allegro", as You can see in
the example "good-slurs.png".
Best Regards Roland
Hello all,
I have a piece I'm engraving where the automatic (default) slur shapes are
not that good. See first attachment for my piece with no \shape commands,
and the second attachment is more how I would like the slur shapes to be.
I have a feeling that I could do a lot with the Slur.details
10 matches
Mail list logo
