Re: Editorial accidentals in figured bass

2016-07-31 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 7/29/16 12:57 AM, "Robert Blackstone" wrote: >Dear all, > >I've seen in the documentattion that it is possible to put >figure+accidental pairs between brackets, like this [#3] . >Now in some examples I need [#]3. >Is there a way to do this? How about [_#] 3?

Re: Editorial accidentals in figured bass

2016-07-29 Thread Robert Blackstone
Thanks Shane, Elegant or not, it does work. Best regards, Robert Blackstone On 29 Jul 2016, at 12:39 , Shane Brandes wrote: > A possible method by Andrew Cashner on Stack overflow. Probably a > better method out there but this may suffice. > > > \version "2.18.2" > { >

Re: Editorial accidentals in figured bass

2016-07-29 Thread Shane Brandes
A possible method by Andrew Cashner on Stack overflow. Probably a better method out there but this may suffice. \version "2.18.2" { \clef "bass" << { c2 c2 } \figures { < [6- ]>2 < \markup \fontsize #-1 \concat { \raise #0.2 { [

Editorial accidentals in figured bass

2016-07-29 Thread Robert Blackstone
Dear all, I've seen in the documentattion that it is possible to put figure+accidental pairs between brackets, like this [#3] . Now in some examples I need [#]3. Is there a way to do this? Thanks in advance for any help. Best regards, Robert Blackstone