Sure, I didn't mean that transforms weren't well-documented.
I just suggest a paragraph of NR documentation, possibly linking
back to the IR, simply because the kind of technical language
we use in IR isn't obvious to understand for most users I would
guess (linear transform? complex number?
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 20/09/2021 à 23:55, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> Jean Abou Samra writes:
>>
>>> Le 20/09/2021 à 23:31, David Kastrup a écrit :
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Thoughts? One would have to look at the most typical use cases
> to decide on an interface.
Le 20/09/2021 à 23:55, David Kastrup a écrit :
Jean Abou Samra writes:
Le 20/09/2021 à 23:31, David Kastrup a écrit :
Jean Abou Samra writes:
Thoughts? One would have to look at the most typical use cases
to decide on an interface.
Anything wrong with using a ly:transform? type? It's
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 20/09/2021 à 23:31, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> Jean Abou Samra writes:
>>
>>> Thoughts? One would have to look at the most typical use cases
>>> to decide on an interface.
>> Anything wrong with using a ly:transform? type? It's straightforward to
>> create and
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Thoughts? One would have to look at the most typical use cases
> to decide on an interface.
Anything wrong with using a ly:transform? type? It's straightforward to
create and manipulate.
--
David Kastrup
Le 20/09/2021 à 23:31, David Kastrup a écrit :
Jean Abou Samra writes:
Thoughts? One would have to look at the most typical use cases
to decide on an interface.
Anything wrong with using a ly:transform? type? It's straightforward to
create and manipulate.
I had already forgotten about
Le 20/09/2021 à 22:02, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
Question to the experts: Am I right in thinking that the
documentation is misleading here?
That is also my understanding. The rotation property works on a stencil
using its own extents, performing the equivalent of ly:stencil-rotate,
Question to the experts: Am I right in thinking that the
documentation is misleading here?
That is also my understanding. The rotation property works on a stencil
using its own extents, performing the equivalent of ly:stencil-rotate,
not ly:stencil-rotate-absolute. After that, LilyPond
Le 20/09/2021 à 17:23, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
If I understand it correctly, the "reference point" of a layout object
should be its relative (0,0) coordinate. It is possible to display
that point using a small function: [...]
It would be very nice if appendix A.8, "The Emmentaler font", could
Le 20/09/2021 à 15:36, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
Hi Peter,
One thing puzzles me about the documentation when it comes to
placement - it continually refers to the 'reference point' for an
object. I sort of understand what it means, but it doesn't seem to
be defined anywhere. For
> If I understand it correctly, the "reference point" of a layout object
> should be its relative (0,0) coordinate. It is possible to display
> that point using a small function: [...]
It would be very nice if appendix A.8, "The Emmentaler font", could
display the metrics boxes as given in the
Hi Peter,
One thing puzzles me about the documentation when it comes to
placement - it continually refers to the 'reference point' for an
object. I sort of understand what it means, but it doesn't seem to be
defined anywhere. For instance - to rotate a hairpin you have to
specify the
Hello Lukas-Fabian,
Thanks again. I was looking at the wrong place in the documentation. There's a
fine line to be drawn between tweaking and changing a default when you only
want to do it once.
One thing puzzles me about the documentation when it comes to placement - it
continually refers
Hi Peter,
Am 19.09.21 um 18:02 schrieb Peter Toye:
I need to extend the width of a glissando so that it's visible. There
isn't room between the dot and the accidental for any meaningful
symbol. As you can see, I've tried various tweaks but none of them has
any effect.
\version "2.22.1"
I need to extend the width of a glissando so that it's visible. There isn't
room between the dot and the accidental for any meaningful symbol. As you can
see, I've tried various tweaks but none of them has any effect.
\version "2.22.1"
\language "english"
{
\override Glissando.style =
15 matches
Mail list logo
