Am 29.05.2015 um 10:29 schrieb Urs Liska:
This is correct. From my own experience and comments by others most
(major) publishers require you to submit one of the following:;
- Finale files
- Sibelius files
- SCORE files
- PDF
How can this be?
Good question.
Has to be put also
Richard
Le 28 mai 2015 à 20:58, Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com a écrit :
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 20:22 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015 19:06:08 +0100
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com wrote:
Is Sibelius really this bad (ties treated as slurs,
I frequently rewrite
20:58, Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com a écrit :
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 20:22 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015 19:06:08 +0100
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com wrote:
Is Sibelius really this bad (ties treated as slurs,
I frequently rewrite Sibelius scores
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:59 -0400, Stephen MacNeil wrote:
In frescobaldi the tie was picked up as a slur
Ah! I see, in fact Johann was right in the first place, these ties have
been entered as slurs in Sibelius, it is just that, by chance in bar 4
LilyPond generated acceptable-looking ties by
Am 29.05.2015 um 10:29 schrieb Urs Liska:
This is correct. From my own experience and comments by others most
(major) publishers require you to submit one of the following:;
- Finale files
- Sibelius files
- SCORE files
- PDF
Sorry, forgot:
- *any* manuscript to be entered by the
I would think (trying to think business) that tweaking a score in Sib
is faster than in lily. So they receive any bad Sib and tweak it by
hand. (this appies to Fin and Sco too, in a less ergonomic manner).
It maybe easier to find experienced tweakers for these programs that
are older than lily.
Am 29.05.2015 um 16:23 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 10:29 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 29.05.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 21:16 +0200, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello Richard,
Find attached what I get after raw import of the XML file into Sibelius
Hi Ali,
I would think (trying to think business) that tweaking a score in Sib is
faster than in lily.
With the edition-engraver, I would offer (based on a fair bit of experience
now) that *creating* tweaks in Lilypond are within a small percentage,
time-wise, of *creating* tweaks in
Am 29.05.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Ali Cuota:
I would think (trying to think business) that tweaking a score in Sib
is faster than in lily.
What Kieren says here is true. But ...
So they receive any bad Sib and tweak it by
hand. (this appies to Fin and Sco too, in a less ergonomic manner).
It
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 10:29 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 29.05.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 21:16 +0200, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello Richard,
Find attached what I get after raw import of the XML file into Sibelius
7.1.3 and then export as PDF.
In frescobaldi the tie was picked up as a slur
Stephen
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 20:22 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015 19:06:08 +0100
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com wrote:
Is Sibelius really this bad (ties treated as slurs,
I frequently rewrite Sibelius scores into LilyPond, and this is one of the
issues that cost a lot
...@rshann.plus.com a écrit :
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 20:22 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015 19:06:08 +0100
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com wrote:
Is Sibelius really this bad (ties treated as slurs,
I frequently rewrite Sibelius scores into LilyPond, and this is one
On Thu, 28 May 2015 19:06:08 +0100
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com wrote:
Is Sibelius really this bad (ties treated as slurs,
I frequently rewrite Sibelius scores into LilyPond, and this is one of the
issues that cost a lot of manual preprocessing. Moreover, it makes the
composer 'lazy
14 matches
Mail list logo
