el 2019-03-30 a las 18:06 Andrew Bernard escribió:
> I don't think wordwrap is what the OP wanted.
you're right, that's not what i was asking.
> I still think this is a bad engraving choice
again, i don't want to discuss this issue. my question was strictly
related to the possibility of
On 3/31/19, edes wrote:
> as someone who has been using free software for about 20 years now, i know
> the situation. in fact, lilypond is perhaps the project with the highest
> ratio between complexity and resources i know. unfortunately, i'm not a
> programmer and i can't contribute myself.
el 2019-03-29 a las 16:20 David Kastrup escribió:
> Agreement does not buy a whole lot when there is nobody who can or will
> do the job.
as someone who has been using free software for about 20 years now, i know
the situation. in fact, lilypond is perhaps the project with the highest
ratio
Hi edes and Urs,
I don't think wordwrap is what the OP wanted. Can't you just manually split
the long line of text, as per MWE here?
I still think this is a bad engraving choice, especially if it is over a
page break. Maybe a footnote would serve better? How long is the text we
are talking
Am 29.03.19 um 21:01 schrieb Urs Liska:
-\markup \override #(line-width . 20) \wordwrap { This will be
wrapped to some line-width }
Sorry, that must read #'(line-width . 20)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Am 29.03.19 um 15:19 schrieb edes:
el 2019-03-17 a las 11:33 Andrew Bernard escribió:
Sorry, not the specific answer to your question.
hi, thank you for your answer, and excuse my delayed response.
leaving aside considerations if what i'm asking for is a good practice or
not, should i
edes writes:
> el 2019-03-16 a las 19:23 Saul Tobin escribió:
>
>> I agree that when a long markup stretches the measure at the end of a
>> line, it suggests that there may be better ways of laying out the line
>> breaks.
>>
>> Perhaps there should be a penalty for stretched measures due to
el 2019-03-16 a las 19:23 Saul Tobin escribió:
> I agree that when a long markup stretches the measure at the end of a
> line, it suggests that there may be better ways of laying out the line
> breaks.
>
> Perhaps there should be a penalty for stretched measures due to markup in
> Lilypond's
el 2019-03-17 a las 11:33 Andrew Bernard escribió:
> Sorry, not the specific answer to your question.
hi, thank you for your answer, and excuse my delayed response.
leaving aside considerations if what i'm asking for is a good practice or
not, should i understand that there's no way to allow a
I agree that when a long markup stretches the measure at the end of a line,
it suggests that there may be better ways of laying out the line breaks.
Perhaps there should be a penalty for stretched measures due to markup in
Lilypond's line breaking algorithm?
Saul
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019, 6:34 PM
Hi edes,
Look at LSR 829. This is exactly your case, and what I was saying, The line
break is such that the very long text is all on one line. I believe this is
the conventional way to handle this.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hi edes,
Well, if absolute line breaking is not important in your score, you could
always put a break in front of the bar with the long text. In terms of
engraving, which to me is all about clarity for musicians to read, you
don't see many examples of this, as it is indeed hard to read a note
el 2019-03-15 a las 09:44 Urs Liska escribió:
> Markups can't flow beyond the end of a score (horizontally) and widen
> the score if necessary:
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> {
>c'1 -"This is a long text that widens the score because it can't
> protrude." c'1
> }
>
> Is there a possibility
13 matches
Mail list logo
