Am 17.08.2011 07:15, schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
Bertrand Bordage wrote:
Ok, I'll keep LilyPond's default beaming since it's the usual notation.
Thanks!
Bertrand
No! Beam it how _you_ like. Otherwise it’s like using Times font just
because it’s the Microsoft Word default :-) Just say you’re
block or maybe in the -dinclude-settings)!?
So I guess I don't see the reason for the fuss, nor any reason to consider
bug reports etc.
+++
cheers
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Misleading-autobeaming-in-3-4-tp32257336p32275640.html
Sent from the Gnu
Bertrand Bordage wrote:
Ok, I'll keep LilyPond's default beaming since it's the usual notation.
Thanks!
Bertrand
No! Beam it how _you_ like. Otherwise it’s like using Times font just
because it’s the Microsoft Word default :-) Just say you’re following
Debussy...
I ran into a similar problem
sorry to be a pedant, but...
traditionally, 4. [8 8 8] is the exception to the rule that you subdivide the
8ths 2,2,2 in a 3/4 bar
Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert, Chopin, Liszt, Brahms and Ravel do this
consistently. It is also normal for Debussy apart from in the late violin
sonata .
Damian leGassick damianlegass...@mac.com writes:
I'm sorry to contradict David but you'll be hard pushed to find many
published examples of 4. 8 [8 8] that don't have mitigating phrasing
circumstances.
If you take a look at the comments of the bug report, you'll see that
you come in second
Hi Damian,
I am looking at my copy of the famous Scherzo opus 4 of Brahms. (Kalmus
Edition) The beaming is clearly r4 r8 8[ 8 8] all over the place, since
the main them is r4 r8 8[ 8 8]. I see this as an expediting right hand
of Mr. Brahms, I bet 100 euros that the original manuscript is beamed
At Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:00:20 -0400,
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Subject: Re: Misleading autobeaming in 3/4
I am looking at my copy of the famous Scherzo opus 4 of Brahms. (Kalmus
Edition) The beaming is clearly r4 r8 8[ 8 8] all over the place, since
the main them is r4 r8 8[ 8 8
Ok, I'll keep LilyPond's default beaming since it's the usual notation.
Thanks!
Bertrand
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 8/13/11 2:55 PM, Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
(I don't know if we can call this a defect, so I don't send it to bug-lilypond
for the moment)
I am working on a 3/4 score with this rhythmical pattern in the beginning :
4. 8 8 8.
It is repeated five
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/13/11 2:55 PM, Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
(I don't know if we can call this a defect, so I don't send it to
bug-lilypond
for the moment)
I am working on a 3/4 score with this rhythmical pattern in the
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 12:00 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
So the defaults should look like [8 8 8 8 8 8] and even [8. 16 8 8 8
8],
but 4. [8 8 8] is wrong and needs to be 4. 8 [8 8] instead.
6/8 would have [8 8 8] [8 8 8], [8. 16 8] [8 8 8] and 4. [8 8 8],
respectively.
--
Hi everyone!
(I don't know if we can call this a defect, so I don't send it to
bug-lilypond for the moment)
I am working on a 3/4 score with this rhythmical pattern in the beginning :
4. 8 8 8.
It is repeated five times, but the rest of the score is clearly in 3/4 and
not 6/8, contrary to what
checking my Chopin and Brahms, they both notate your rhythm as lilypond
defaults, so it's not a defect - i'm certainly used to seeing it notated like
that in 3/4
to my eyes your desired version looks wrong, but if that's really what you
want, then using [ and ] or \noBeam as and when is
13 matches
Mail list logo
