I can see your point. I'm trying to get the LilyPond score to look like
the original, but maybe in this case a slavish concern for exactness isn't
appropriate.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-04-22 0:43 GMT+02:00
2014-04-22 0:43 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de:
On Apr 21, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a piece I'm typesetting where an internal voice needs a tie, but
\tieDown isn't enough. The tie spanner needs to be at the bottom (in this
case) of
I have a piece I'm typesetting where an internal voice needs a tie, but
\tieDown isn't enough. The tie spanner needs to be at the bottom (in this
case) of the stems. Here is a snippet that illustrates the problem:
\version 2.18.2
\new Staff {
\key bes \major
\time 5/4
{
aes aes'4 bes
Does the tie need to connect the eeses? This looks good, but maybe not to your
specs.
\version 2.18.2
\new Staff {
\key bes \major
\time 5/4
{
aes aes'4 bes bes' aes aes'
bes bes'8[ c' c'' ees' ees'' bes bes']
} \\
{
\override Stem.length = #8.0
\stemDown ees'2. ees'4^~ ees'8 r8
}
}
Best,
Alternatively, use the override inserted below.
Best, Simon
Am 22.04.2014 00:40, schrieb Conor Cook:
Does the tie need to connect the eeses? This looks good, but maybe not to your
specs.
\version 2.18.2
\new Staff {
\key bes \major
\time 5/4
{
aes aes'4 bes bes' aes aes'
bes bes'8[ c' c''
That's it, Simon! Thanks. And thanks for the suggestion, Conor. That did
look better.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.dewrote:
Alternatively, use the override inserted below.
Best, Simon
Am 22.04.2014 00:40, schrieb Conor
You’re welcome. But Simon’s definitely looks better :)
~Conor Cook
On Apr 21, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com wrote:
That's it, Simon! Thanks. And thanks for the suggestion, Conor. That did
look better.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:43
