Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Ok thanks for the clarification Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Stephen MacNeil writes: > Hi David > > I notice both > > ^(_(d) > > > and > > ^(_(d)) > > > work. The last with )) > > > is one way "more" correct? Slurs don't nest. The current implementation does not complain about spurious slur starts/ends. It's only when the

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Hi David I notice both ^(_(d) and ^(_(d)) work. The last with )) is one way "more" correct? Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Stephen MacNeil writes: > \set doubleSlurs = ##t > > (d) Or just ^(_( d) since two slurs with explicit direction will both be kept around. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

An hour ago, I wrote: > (In the [attached] larger file, I was able to put an explicit \oneVoice > overriding \voiceTwo and imitate the printed version, but this only > worked for the upper staff, and not in my excerpt.) > > Can anyone suggest the correct way forward? I figured something out;