Hi Jean,
It worked! I managed to move from a Nunjucks macro to a LilyPond music
function for creating custom shaped slurs. Thank you very much for your
substantial support! It would be much more difficult if ever possible for
me without your help!
Thank you,
Vlad
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 9:44 PM
Le dimanche 02 juillet 2023 à 18:47 +0200, Volodymyr Prokopyuk a écrit :
> Thank you very much for multiple options! I've decided to try the first one. I
> still have two difficulties
> * How to create alist from the components ax, ay, ... (see comment in the code
> below)?
The control-points
Hi Jean,
Thank you very much for multiple options! I've decided to try the first
one. I still have two difficulties
- How to create alist from the components ax, ay, ... (see comment in
the code below)?
- How would I call this function? I guess c'4 \shapedSlur fu #'((bs .
3.0) (ht .
Le dimanche 02 juillet 2023 à 14:28 +0200, Volodymyr Prokopyuk a écrit :
> I wonder if there is a **way to define a music function with default
> parameters** and be able to selectively specify some parameters using the
> **parameters names** leaving all other parameters with their default
Good afternoon, Jean and Valentin,
Thank you very much for the up to the point explanation, working function,
as well as alternatives syntax for object properties using Scheme
metaprogramming! Lilypond is quite flexible, but with its own quirks as the
handling of default parameters to a music
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Am Samstag, 1. Juli 2023, 18:48:31 CEST schrieb David Kastrup:
>> The funny thing is that I suspect Han-Wen might still be surprised to
>> hear what Staff.property "actually means".
>>
>> It's been around for quite longer than its "actual meaning". But of
>> course I
Am Samstag, 1. Juli 2023, 18:48:31 CEST schrieb David Kastrup:
> The funny thing is that I suspect Han-Wen might still be surprised to
> hear what Staff.property "actually means".
>
> It's been around for quite longer than its "actual meaning". But of
> course I should be the last person to
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello Vlad,
>
> in addition to Jean’s answer it might be helpful to understand what
>
> Staff.property
>
> actually means. This get’s parsed to a list of the symbols 'Staff and
> 'property. So you can in fact simply remain with scheme, and directly enter
> #(list
Hello Vlad,
in addition to Jean’s answer it might be helpful to understand what
Staff.property
actually means. This get’s parsed to a list of the symbols 'Staff and
'property. So you can in fact simply remain with scheme, and directly enter
#(list scope 'property) like this
%
\version
Le samedi 01 juillet 2023 à 16:42 +0200, Volodymyr Prokopyuk a écrit :
> I'm trying to define a music function as below, however I've faced
> difficulties with parameter predicates, visibility of the Staff object, and
> flexibility of the solution ideally without code duplication
>
> **Desired
Hi,
I'm trying to define a music function as below, however I've faced
difficulties with parameter predicates, visibility of the Staff object, and
flexibility of the solution ideally without code duplication
*Desired music function* (the code is not working)
momentBeat =
11 matches
Mail list logo
