Hello,
On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
Any estimates of the number of active users of lilypond? We could
arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
results in I think in 10%
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
Any estimates of the number of active users of lilypond? We could
arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but
I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
URL:https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126
I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a
solution for making actual payouts is
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
URL:https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126
I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a
Werner LEMBERG writes:
I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Werner LEMBERG writes:
I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
Not yet, thanks for that!
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow process...
Maybe we should do the same for
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
Not yet, thanks for that!
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow
On 10/5/12, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
Not yet, thanks for that!
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
some
Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net writes:
On 10/5/12, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
Not yet, thanks for that!
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Actually, I've already asked for
I thought of a solution.
This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an
editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo.
For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter
shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where
the
Any estimates of the number of active users of lilypond? We could
arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
results in I think in 10% or so lost to the middle men, but it could
suffice. I'd be happy to pay
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling is the key :)
Of course, it wouldn't probably
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling
is the
Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Disabling automatic line
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł
2012/10/3 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Imagine a piece for medium-sized orchestra (10 instruments, 200
measures). In LilyPond code, you have to write the instruments
separately from each other - the connection between them is not
visible. It is difficult to visualise how they
This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an
editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo.
For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter
shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where
the code need extensions and
I think MTX was doing that (or PMX?). I used it and would counsel to
try it there. If you find it usefull, why not?
Personally, I am happy with writing down on paper and transcribing
then (when the music becomes to complicated form my poor coding
habits).
Francois
2012/10/3, David Kastrup
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2012/10/3 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Imagine a piece for medium-sized orchestra (10 instruments, 200
measures). In LilyPond code, you have to write the instruments
separately from each other - the connection between them is not
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nils Gey i...@nilsgey.de wrote:
I thought of a solution.
[...]
Summary: It is totally possible, but I can't do it right now.
So, 50 bucks will have to wait :)
I'm actually surprised that noone pledged any additional bounty...
Janek
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
I think that what you want does actually exist, and it is called a
spreadsheet. They are commonly used for (or primarily intended for)
numbers and formulae laid out in rows and columns, although people do
use them for pretty everything from I lost my
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling is the key
:)
Of course, it wouldn't probably make sense to *store* music in this format.
Hi,
one of the things that i find inconvenient in reading Lily syntax is
its sequential nature. For example,
{
a4 b c d
e f g a
e a g f
}
{
e4 a g f
c2 e
d8 c f4 d2
}
it's hard to read the harmonies from the code, because voices are separate.
I know about
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:53:23 +0200
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
one of the things that i find inconvenient in reading Lily syntax is
its sequential nature. For example,
{
a4 b c d
e f g a
e a g f
}
{
e4 a g f
c2 e
d8 c f4 d2
Nils Gey l...@nilsgey.de writes:
I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of
durations and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not.
Really? I know Emacs has it since it complains when you place bar
checks at the wrong point of time. Frescobaldi, judging from its
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Nils Gey l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of durations
and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not. This way the conversion
from parallel back to sequential is a bit tricky since you need to keep track
of
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
{ a4 b c d e f g a ea g f }
Am 26.09.2012 13:53, schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code
above would be
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
regular lilypond to horizontal
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
But I think this would be quite complex, because the editor would have
to know the musical moment we are at. Which seems complicated from the
beginning, but if we start to (re-)use variables ...
Seems like point-and-click Midi would deliver most of the
On 26 Sep 2012, at 14:06 , Urs Liska wrote:
Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
In an ideal world these windows wouldn't only go into the same file
but into the same piece of music.
TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and
the same file, updates in one
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote:
TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
Christ van Willegen
--
09
2012/9/26 Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote:
TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
Vim can do that with as many
2012/9/26 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de:
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
the same musical time.
Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
In an
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2012/9/26 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de:
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
the same musical time.
On 27/09/12 01:41, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/9/26 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de:
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
the same musical time.
Oh
40 matches
Mail list logo
