Timothy,
Thank you, exactly what I wanted.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Timothy Lanfear
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 2:07 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: tie across voices
On 23/12/2018
Jay,
Beautiful, and it preserves the voice leading!
Thank you!
Mark
From: Jay Anderson [mailto:horndud...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 3:11 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: tie across voices
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> Please see attached snippet.
>
> In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
>
> I have looked at using transparent as given in
>
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
>
> yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest.
>
My
On 23/12/2018 21:35, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello,
Please see attached snippet.
In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
I have looked at using transparent as given in
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest.
Any suggestions would be
On 2018-12-23 1:35 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
I have looked at using transparent as given in
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
It's not
Hello,
Please see attached snippet.
In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied.
I have looked at using transparent as given in
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8
yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Mark
On 2018-06-04 06:33, Ursus wrote:
It seems the most simple way to get what I need is continuing the first
and
second voice for a bar filling the first voice with the notes I need
like
thus and placing an invisible rest the second voice.
r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | f4. e8 r2 | } \\ {
Ursus wrote:
Not quite satisfied yet
I am not sure I understand what you need,
but to get the last bar looking like
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t4044/Image_001.png
I would
- put the stem-down things in the second voice:| f4. e8
- let the first voice tie to just a
It seems the most simple way to get what I need is continuing the first and
second voice for a bar filling the first voice with the notes I need like
thus and placing an invisible rest the second voice.
r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | f4. e8 r2 | } \\ { f4~ | f2 r | s1 |} >>
Although this
e <<\\>> construct creates a new
and separate voice. I looked into creating a tie across voices but still
haven't found a working solution. Now I'm sure this must be pretty simple.
Would the solution work similarly with slurs?
Hello,
If you just want a down and dirty tie between voic
es a new
and separate voice. I looked into creating a tie across voices but still
haven't found a working solution. Now I'm sure this must be pretty simple.
Would the solution work similarly with slurs?
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
__
David Sumbler writes:
> The automatic creation of contexts is obviously very useful, especially
> when one is just a beginner at Lilypond. But I almost wish that there
> were an option to turn it off, which would be useful for forcing
> oneself to understand how this all
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:55 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > It seems that if, in a
> > <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>>
> > passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music
> > before
> > the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music
On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote:
It seems that if, in a
<<{\musicA} {\musicB}>>
passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before
the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all
be treated as belonging to the same voice. Is that correct?
Have
On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:43 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler:
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> >
> > \new Staff {
> > \time 6/8
> > <<
> > { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10
> > R2. | r4. e'''~ }
> >
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:30 AM David Sumbler wrote:
> \version "2.19.81"
>
> \new Staff {
> \time 6/8
> <<
> { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10
> R2. | r4. e'''~ }
> \\
> { g''2.~ | g''~ }
> >>
> \oneVoice 2.~ | q |
> }
David Sumbler writes:
> \version "2.19.81"
>
> \new Staff {
> \time 6/8
> <<
> { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10
> R2. | r4. e'''~ }
> \\
> { g''2.~ | g''~ }
> >>
> \oneVoice 2.~ | q |
> }
>
> In the above I want the
Hi David,
Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler:
\version "2.19.81"
\new Staff {
\time 6/8
<<
{ \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10
R2. | r4. e'''~ }
\\
{ g''2.~ | g''~ }
>>
\oneVoice 2.~ | q |
}
One possibility would be:
\version "2.19.81"
\new Staff {
\time 6/8
<<
{ \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10
R2. | r4. e'''~ }
\\
{ g''2.~ | g''~ }
>>
\oneVoice 2.~ | q |
}
In the above I want the lower note to be tied continuously. As it
stands, there is no tie
appizz@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Tie across voices
On 2016-02-12 15:37, Joseph N. Srednicki wrote:
> In the following three-beat example, I am trying to tie the
> upper-voice note in the second beat with the lower-voice note of the
> third beat.
>
> My example seems to work so
.
Can someone please explain how to align the upper and lower voices in the
second and third beats or another approach to the problem of coding the tie
across voices?
I tried using \shiftOn to align the voices, but I was unsuccessful.
I used Google to search and found the snippet located
beats do not align vertically as
they should.
Can someone please explain how to align the upper and lower voices in
the second and third beats or another approach to the problem of
coding the tie across voices?
I tried using \shiftOn to align the voices, but I was unsuccessful.
I used Google
22 matches
Mail list logo