RE: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Timothy, Thank you, exactly what I wanted. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Lanfear Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 2:07 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: tie across voices On 23/12/2018

RE: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Jay, Beautiful, and it preserves the voice leading! Thank you! Mark From: Jay Anderson [mailto:horndud...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2018 3:11 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: tie across voices On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen

Re: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Jay Anderson
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 2:40 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Please see attached snippet. > > In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. > > I have looked at using transparent as given in > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 > > yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest. > My

Re: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Timothy Lanfear
On 23/12/2018 21:35, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello, Please see attached snippet. In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. I have looked at using transparent as given in http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 yet that would “collide” with the quarter rest. Any suggestions would be

Re: tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-12-23 1:35 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. I have looked at using transparent as given in http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. It's not

tie across voices

2018-12-23 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Hello, Please see attached snippet. In measure 3 the two e flats should be tied. I have looked at using transparent as given in http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=8 yet that would "collide" with the quarter rest. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Mark

Re: solve tie across voices

2018-06-04 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-06-04 06:33, Ursus wrote: It seems the most simple way to get what I need is continuing the first and second voice for a bar filling the first voice with the notes I need like thus and placing an invisible rest the second voice. r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | f4. e8 r2 | } \\ {

Re: solve tie across voices

2018-06-04 Thread Robin Bannister
Ursus wrote: Not quite satisfied yet I am not sure I understand what you need, but to get the last bar looking like http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t4044/Image_001.png I would - put the stem-down things in the second voice:| f4. e8 - let the first voice tie to just a

Re: solve tie across voices

2018-06-04 Thread Ursus
It seems the most simple way to get what I need is continuing the first and second voice for a bar filling the first voice with the notes I need like thus and placing an invisible rest the second voice. r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | f4. e8 r2 | } \\ { f4~ | f2 r | s1 |} >> Although this

Re: solve tie across voices

2018-06-04 Thread Ben
e <<\\>> construct creates a new and separate voice. I looked into creating a tie across voices but still haven't found a working solution. Now I'm sure this must be pretty simple. Would the solution work similarly with slurs? Hello, If you just want a down and dirty tie between voic

solve tie across voices

2018-06-04 Thread Ursus
es a new and separate voice. I looked into creating a tie across voices but still haven't found a working solution. Now I'm sure this must be pretty simple. Would the solution work similarly with slurs? -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html __

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-05 Thread David Kastrup
David Sumbler writes: > The automatic creation of contexts is obviously very useful, especially > when one is just a beginner at Lilypond.  But I almost wish that there > were an option to turn it off, which would be useful for forcing > oneself to understand how this all

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-05 Thread David Sumbler
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:55 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > It seems that if, in a > > <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> > > passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music > > before > > the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-04 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: It seems that if, in a <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all be treated as belonging to the same voice.  Is that correct? Have

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-04 Thread David Sumbler
On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:43 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > > > \new Staff { > >    \time 6/8 > >    << > >  { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > >    R2. | r4. e'''~ } > >

Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-04 Thread Knute Snortum
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:30 AM David Sumbler wrote: > \version "2.19.81" > > \new Staff { > \time 6/8 > << > { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > R2. | r4. e'''~ } > \\ > { g''2.~ | g''~ } > >> > \oneVoice 2.~ | q | > }

Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-03 Thread David Kastrup
David Sumbler writes: > \version "2.19.81" > > \new Staff { >   \time 6/8  >   << > { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 >   R2. | r4. e'''~ } > \\ > { g''2.~ | g''~ } >   >> >  \oneVoice 2.~ | q | > } > > In the above I want the

Re: Tie across voices

2018-05-03 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Hi David, Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: \version "2.19.81" \new Staff {   \time 6/8   << { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10   R2. | r4. e'''~ } \\ { g''2.~ | g''~ }   >>  \oneVoice 2.~ | q | } One possibility would be:

Tie across voices

2018-05-03 Thread David Sumbler
\version "2.19.81" \new Staff {   \time 6/8    << { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10   R2. | r4. e'''~ } \\ { g''2.~ | g''~ }   >>  \oneVoice 2.~ | q | } In the above I want the lower note to be tied continuously.  As it stands, there is no tie

RE: Tie across voices

2016-02-13 Thread Joseph N. Srednicki
appizz@gnu.org Subject: Re: Tie across voices On 2016-02-12 15:37, Joseph N. Srednicki wrote: > In the following three-beat example, I am trying to tie the > upper-voice note in the second beat with the lower-voice note of the > third beat. > > My example seems to work so

Tie across voices

2016-02-12 Thread Joseph N. Srednicki
. Can someone please explain how to align the upper and lower voices in the second and third beats or another approach to the problem of coding the tie across voices? I tried using \shiftOn to align the voices, but I was unsuccessful. I used Google to search and found the snippet located

Re: Tie across voices

2016-02-12 Thread Nathan Ho
beats do not align vertically as they should. Can someone please explain how to align the upper and lower voices in the second and third beats or another approach to the problem of coding the tie across voices? I tried using \shiftOn to align the voices, but I was unsuccessful. I used Google