Tuplet bracket numbering problem

2002-06-07 Thread Carter Brey
Dear colleagues, I'm running Lily version 1.5.58. I cannot seem to get rid of the little 3's under each triplet beam in this excerpt: \property Voice.tupletSpannerDuration = #(make-moment 1 8) \property Voice.TupletBracket \set #'tuplet-number-visibility = ##f \times 2/3{[d'(

Re: Tuplet bracket numbering problem

2002-06-07 Thread Mats Bengtsson
It seems that some benign developer has renamed the property to number-visibility without even documenting the change in the ChangeLog and without including the change in convert-ly or the example file input/regression/triplets.ly. Likewise, the tuplet-bracket-visibility property has been

Re: Tuplet bracket numbering problem

2002-06-07 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems that some benign developer has renamed the property to number-visibility without even documenting the change in the ChangeLog and without including the change in convert-ly or the example file input/regression/triplets.ly. Likewise, the

Re: Tuplet bracket numbering problem

2002-06-07 Thread Carter Brey
Dear Gentlemen, Alas, a correction using number-visibility elicits this error message: warning: Not a grob name, 'tupletBracket'. Has the grob also been renamed? Carter (still swimming in little 3's) Mats Bengtsson wrote: It seems that some benign developer has renamed the property to

Re: Tuplet bracket numbering problem

2002-06-07 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Dear Gentlemen, Alas, a correction using number-visibility elicits this error message: warning: Not a grob name, 'tupletBracket'. Has the grob also been renamed? No, but maybe you have done it, it should be called TupletBracket and the name is case sensitive. A complete version of your

Re: Tuplet bracket numbering problem

2002-06-07 Thread Carter Brey
Thanks, that fixed everything. How weird; I know the case was correct when I sent the initial email. Can't figure out how the capital T got changed. Anyway... thanks for your patient assistance. CB (on tour in Cologne) Mats Bengtsson wrote: Dear Gentlemen, Alas, a correction using