Re: Unmerged accidentals

[Leo Correia de Verdier]

Thanks!

While not what I was expecting, it works well for me. (I was expecting them to 
have been merged into a single grob, not to be printed on top of eachother). If 
anyone was curious about it, my rather more aggressive hack was:
%
\version "2.19.84"
 {  <\tweak Accidental.alteration #1/2 fih' fis'> }
%

> 25 feb. 2020 kl. 16:25 skrev Pierre Perol-Schneider 
> :
> 
> Hi Leo,
> Since I don't know how you made it, here's what I'd do:
> 
> \version "2.19.84"
> {   }
> %% or
> {   }
> 
> So also a hack.
> Cheers, 
> Pierre
> 
> Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 14:46, Leo Correia de Verdier 
>  a écrit :
> Dear list!
> 
> Is there a neat way to achieve two (unmerged) accidentals of the same type in 
> front of an unison? I can produce the attached output by means of some 
> hacking, but am wondering if there is a way of preventing them being merged 
> in the first place.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /Leo

Re: Unmerged accidentals

[Pierre Perol-Schneider]

Hi Leo,
Since I don't know how you made it, here's what I'd do:

\version "2.19.84"
{   }
%% or
{   }

So also a hack.
Cheers,
Pierre

Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 14:46, Leo Correia de Verdier <
leo.correia.de.verd...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Dear list!
>
> Is there a neat way to achieve two (unmerged) accidentals of the same type
> in front of an unison? I can produce the attached output by means of some
> hacking, but am wondering if there is a way of preventing them being merged
> in the first place.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> /Leo

Unmerged accidentals

[Leo Correia de Verdier]

Dear list!

Is there a neat way to achieve two (unmerged) accidentals of the same type in 
front of an unison? I can produce the attached output by means of some hacking, 
but am wondering if there is a way of preventing them being merged in the first 
place.



doublesharp.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Thanks!

/Leo