a large partial measure should be notated as a full
measure (rest+upbeat) or a partial measure. More specifically, it's
the beginning of the following piece:
- version 1, as partial
http://www3.cpdl.org/wiki/images/6/6c/Becker-albert_bleibe-abend-will-es-werden.pdf
- version 2, as full
Dear all,
I wonder whether a large partial measure should be notated as a full
measure (rest+upbeat) or a partial measure. More specifically, it's the
beginning of the following piece:
- version 1, as partial
http://www3.cpdl.org/wiki/images/6/6c/Becker-albert_bleibe-abend-will-es
, your version 1 is wrong. Soprano and Tenor must have r4 r2; I’m
pretty sure that one never writes full measure rests in a partial measure.
On 02.09.2014 12:21, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Dear all,
I wonder whether a large partial measure should be notated as a full
measure (rest+upbeat
.
Also, your version 1 is wrong. Soprano and Tenor must have r4 r2; I’m
pretty sure that one never writes full measure rests in a partial measure.
On 02.09.2014 12:21, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Dear all,
I wonder whether a large partial measure should be notated as a full
measure (rest+upbeat
On 09/02/2014 12:36 PM, Malte Meyn wrote:
I think this is not a matter of engraving rules but you should follow
the composer. (If I was the composer I would prefer a version with a
full measure beginning with a rest in this case. But I’m not Albert
Becker.) I’ve seen both versions in different
measure (rest+upbeat) or a partial measure. More specifically, it's
the
beginning of the following piece:
- version 1, as partial
http://www3.cpdl.org/wiki/images/6/6c/Becker-albert_bleibe-abend-will-es-werden.pdf
- version 2, as full measure
http://www3.cpdl.org/wiki/images/archive/6/6c
At 12:21 02/09/2014 +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote:
I wonder whether a large partial measure should be notated as a
full measure (rest+upbeat) or a partial measure.
[...]
Or could anybody consult a copy of Gould or similar?
The one difficulty I have with Elaine Gould's otherwise splendid book
