Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-30 Thread David Kastrup
Lucas Werkmeister writes: > Hi everyone! > > In a composition I’m transcribing, there are double slurs between some > notes (see attached image, also uploaded at [1]), and the lower slurs > are right next to the note heads, inside the beams – whereas when > typeset by

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
On 2018-03-29 13:33, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Mats, Just use the new features of version 2.19: I tried that (see a previous post on this thread), but there are collisions (see a separate "bug?" thread). Did you not find that the slurs collide with the noteheads on your machine? Right,

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-29 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mats, > Just use the new features of version 2.19: I tried that (see a previous post on this thread), but there are collisions (see a separate "bug?" thread). Did you not find that the slurs collide with the noteheads on your machine? Cheers, Kieren.

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Sorry, I was too quick! See corrected version below. On 2018-03-29 09:24, Mats Bengtsson wrote: On 2018-03-29 00:39, Lucas Werkmeister wrote: Hi everyone! In a composition I’m transcribing, there are double slurs between some notes (see attached image, also uploaded at [1]), and the

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
On 2018-03-29 00:39, Lucas Werkmeister wrote: Hi everyone! In a composition I’m transcribing, there are double slurs between some notes (see attached image, also uploaded at [1]), and the lower slurs are right next to the note heads, inside the beams – whereas when typeset by LilyPond,

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-28 Thread Carl Sorensen
From: Lucas Werkmeister <m...@lucaswerkmeister.de> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 4:39 PM To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: double slurs within beamed notes Does anyone have better ideas? :) Slur on one note, phrasing slur on the ot

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-28 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Lucas, > Hm, is this \=1 thing a new feature in the development version? I can’t get > it to work on 2.18.2. Might be. Sorry if you can’t take advantage of it. (Related: I recommend you consider using the "unstable" version regularly: I use it exclusively, for mission-critical day-to-day

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-28 Thread Lucas Werkmeister
Hi Kieren, thanks for taking a look! On 29.03.2018 01:52, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Lucas, > >> I did find one workaround, and I’ll describe it just in case someone else >> with the same problem finds this email later, but it is horrible: > Here’s another… though I’m not sure it’s much less

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-28 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Lucas, > I did find one workaround, and I’ll describe it just in case someone else > with the same problem finds this email later, but it is horrible: Here’s another… though I’m not sure it’s much less horrible: %%% SNIPPET ENDS \version "2.19.80" stuff = {

double slurs within beamed notes

2018-03-28 Thread Lucas Werkmeister
Hi everyone! In a composition I’m transcribing, there are double slurs between some notes (see attached image, also uploaded at [1]), and the lower slurs are right next to the note heads, inside the beams – whereas when typeset by LilyPond, the slurs are outside the beams. I’m wondering what the

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2010-02-27 Thread Bernhard Ott
On 02/27/2010 06:20 AM, musicologyman wrote: I've been struggling to replicate the placement of slurs and ties in the following original: Problem is, I can't get the slurs and ties to appear _within_ the beamed note. They always appear above the beam if the stem is up and below if the stem is

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2010-02-27 Thread Colin Campbell
musicologyman wrote: I've been struggling to replicate the placement of slurs and ties in the following original: Problem is, I can't get the slurs and ties to appear _within_ the beamed note. They always appear above the beam if the stem is up and below if the stem is down:

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2010-02-27 Thread musicologyman
://old.nabble.com/double-slurs-within-beamed-notes-tp27725943p27730345.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2010-02-27 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi, You might want to do something like this: \version 2.12.1 stuff = \relative c'' { \time 2/4 \tieUp \slurDown \partial 8 \stemUp g d'~8( | fis d') g d'~[( fis d']) \stemDown b d~( | c d) \stemUp b d~[( fis d']) g d'~8( | fis d') g d'~[( fis d']) \stemDown b d~( | c d) a

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2010-02-27 Thread musicologyman
Thanks! That did the trick! One question: what does the en-dash before the \tweak command mean/do? --RW -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/double-slurs-within-beamed-notes-tp27725943p27731275.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: double slurs within beamed notes

2010-02-27 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi RW, Thanks! That did the trick! Great. One question: what does the en-dash before the \tweak command mean/do? Shouldn't be an en-dash; just a hyphen. Anyway, it's required to attach or anchor the \tweak to the moment (note) it belongs to, just like g- is used to attach/anchor an