On Saturday, May 28, 2016, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> What's the difference using or not using the \\? I tried but I didn't
> see any difference.
> g.
In this case, nothing noticeable, but it really is different because using
\\ creates completely new voice. So, attachments like lyrics, slurs, tie
What's the difference using or not using the \\? I tried but I didn't
see any difference.
g.
On 27 May 2016 at 22:52, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote:
> In the line of using a master to hold all dynamic information, I’d prefer:
>
> <<
> \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
> \\
> { s1\p\< |
In the line of using a master to hold all dynamic information, I’d prefer:
<<
\repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
\\
{ s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! }
>>
JM
> Le 27 mai 2016 à 22:11, Gianmaria Lari a écrit :
>
>>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
>>> l
>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
>> like this (that of course does not work):
>>
>> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5} \!
>>
>
> <<
> \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
> { s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! }
> >>
Oh! You're right, it work
Am 27.05.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Toine Schreurs:
Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
the same notes but different dynamic information:
\version "2.19.40"
{
a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
}
Is there any way to writ
> Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
> the same notes but different dynamic information:
>
> \version "2.19.40"
> {
> a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
> a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
> a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
> }
>
> Is there any way to write the previous code using a re
Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
the same notes but different dynamic information:
\version "2.19.40"
{
a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
}
Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
like t