Re: Error in a very short snippet

2018-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Paolo Prete writes: > Hi,what's wrong in the snippet below and how can I fix it?It compiles > if I remove the tie ~ from the variable, but I need this tie... > > x = c'~ >  {    \x\mp } Without the tie, x is just the pitch c' and nothing else. With the tie, it is a c'

Re: Error in a very short snippet

2018-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Paolo Prete writes: > Thanks for your reply.In which date (more or less) do you think that a > new version with this feature will be released as a Linux binary ? After the next stable release which still has some pending critical bugs. -- David Kastrup

Re: Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread Joel C. Salomon
On 2018-02-23 3:45 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Is there anything that could be written on this page that would make it more > clear? > No, that’s clear enough –– when I know to look for it. Perhaps a link

Re: Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Joel, > Perhaps a link to what the * scaling notation means might be added to its use > in > That's not a bad idea! Thanks, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website:

Re: Error in a very short snippet

2018-02-23 Thread Paolo Prete
Thanks for your reply.In which date (more or less) do you think that a new version with this feature will be released as a Linux binary ? Il Venerdì 23 Febbraio 2018 23:09, David Kastrup ha scritto: Paolo Prete writes: > Hi,what's wrong in the

Error in a very short snippet

2018-02-23 Thread Paolo Prete
Hi,what's wrong in the snippet below and how can I fix it?It compiles if I remove the tie ~ from the variable, but I need this tie... x = c'~  {    \x\mp } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Breath or articulation mark between two beamed eighth or sixteenth notes

2018-02-23 Thread Joe Srednicki
Hello: I am working on organ music. Lily pond does not allow a breath mark beamed eighth or sixteenth notes. Is there any way to override this? If the documentation covers this issue, please point me to the location. Thanks. Joe Srednicki ___

Re: Breath or articulation mark between two beamed eighth or sixteenth notes

2018-02-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Joe, > I am working on organ music. Lily pond does not allow a breath mark beamed > eighth or sixteenth notes. Not sure what you mean: \version "2.19" \layout { ragged-right = ##f line-width = 2\in } { c''8[ \breathe f'] } That seems to work for me. Does it not work for you? Thanks,

Lyric centre-on-word / ignore-punctuation bug

2018-02-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, When a lyric syllable begins with a typographer’s single quote (e.g., ’cause, ’ll, etc.), the "ignore-punctuation" hack doesn't work. Any hints on how to fix this would be appreciated. Thanks, Kieren. %%% SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.19" #(define space-set (list->char-set

Slur after a function

2018-02-23 Thread Paolo Prete
Hello,is there a way to add a slur after the parameters given to \fun in the snippet below ?The following code doesn't compile and I wonder if I can solve that by using another syntax... fun = #(define-music-function (parser location num note) (number? ly:duration?)#{ c' 4 #}) \score{ { \fun

Re: autoBeam and slurs in tab

2018-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno gio 22 feb 2018 alle 23:51, =?iso-8859-1?b?yXJpYw==?= > <"eric.bellocq"@yahoo.fr> ha scritto: >> Hello, >> slurs in polyphonic tab are badly impacted by autoBeam Off/On >> Looks related to issue #3542 but I'm not able to understand more. >

Re: Slur after a function

2018-02-23 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 23.02.2018 19:02, Paolo Prete wrote: The following code doesn't compile and I wonder if I can solve that by using another syntax... This works: \version "2.19.80" fun = #(define-music-function   (num note post)   (number? ly:duration? ly:music?)   #{ c'4 $post #}) \score {  

Re: Slur after a function

2018-02-23 Thread Paolo Prete
You were faster than light, Simon, thanks ;-) Il Venerdì 23 Febbraio 2018 19:12, Simon Albrecht ha scritto: On 23.02.2018 19:02, Paolo Prete wrote: > The following code doesn't compile and I wonder if I can solve that by > using another syntax... This works:

Edition Engraver and a rebel Tie

2018-02-23 Thread Stefano Troncaro
Hello everyone! In the attached file there is a Tie whose direction can only be modified with ly:grob-set-property!. Overrides to Tie.direction and use of \tieDown seem to fail, and I have no idea why! The example uses the Edition Engraver, although I don't know if the problem lies in the EE or

Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread Joel C. Salomon
Neighbors, In setting the attached music, it’s evident that the 2. chord in bar 4 overlaps with the g8 note at the end of the bar. And while I’m able to achieve this \version "2.19.65" \new Staff \relative c'' { \time 6/8 << { s8*5 g8 | }

Re: Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Joel, What about \new Staff \relative c'' { \once \stemDown 2.*5/6 g8 } ? Hope that helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___

Re: Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread Joel C. Salomon
On 2018-02-23 2:55 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > \new Staff \relative c'' { > \once \stemDown 2.*5/6 g8 > } So *that’s* what the * notation means. I’ve used it for multi-measure rests, per the documentation, but I did not understand how it worked. Thanks! ––Joel C. Salomon

Re: Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Joel, > So *that’s* what the * notation means. I’ve used it for multi-measure > rests, per the documentation, but I did not understand how it worked. Is there anything that could be written on this page that would make it more clear?

Re: Slur after a function

2018-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Paolo Prete writes: > Hello,is there a way to add a slur after the parameters given to \fun > in the snippet below ?The following code doesn't compile and I wonder > if I can solve that by using another syntax... > > fun = #(define-music-function (parser location num note)

Re: Override duration of note

2018-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
"Joel C. Salomon" writes: > On 2018-02-23 2:55 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> \new Staff \relative c'' { >> \once \stemDown 2.*5/6 g8 >> } > > So *that’s* what the * notation means. I’ve used it for multi-measure > rests, per the documentation, but I did not understand

Re: autoBeam and slurs in tab

2018-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Éric writes: > Ok I understand. > Thank you very much. Just to be sure: I remarked that Federico's comment on the autobeaming problem was wrong. Which in itself was not entirely accurate since "autoBeaming" is established at Score and TabStaff level and unless it is

Re: autoBeam and slurs in tab

2018-02-23 Thread Éric
Thanks for details David. Yes it's not really a usual beginner wrong-context-use problem. Another problem (with more consequences) was added to me, by my poor understanding of the differences between \autoBeamOff and \noBeam !! Éric -- Sent from:

ScholarLy and Latex

2018-02-23 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Lilyponders, I'm having a minor problem with getting my ScholarLy inp file to work with Latex. The Latex output for each annotation looks like this: \criticalRemark [grob={DynamicText}, grob-location={Can't display grob location yet}, grob-type={DynamicText},

Re: autoBeam and slurs in tab

2018-02-23 Thread Éric
Ok I understand. Thank you very much. Éric -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user